and (()-abrotanone by utilizing an innovative Ga(III)-
catalyzed cycloisomerization strategy.5 This work led to the
structural revisions of abrotanone and abrotandiol; the latter
was found to be identical to brussonol (1). Subsequently,
Majetich identified and reported conditions that lead to the
production of (-)-brussonol starting from (+)-demethyl-
salvicanol.6
Scheme 2. First-Generation Retrosynthetic Analysis of 1
We became attracted to the synthesis of 1 due to our long-
standing interest in constructing highly substituted ꢀ-C-
glycoside moieties via oxocarbenium cation intermediates
and the limited knowledge of its biological profile.7 Our
previous synthesis of bruguierol C featured a diastereose-
lective capture of an in situ generated oxocarbenium ion via
an intramolecular Marson-type Friedel-Crafts cyclization as
the key step that readily delivered the natural product.8 We
were hopeful that a similar strategy would allow for the for-
mal syntheses of both (()-brussonol and (()-abrotanone in
a very rapid and efficient manner utilizing inexpensive staring
materials and reagents.
Our synthetic plan, if realized, would not only be a
prime example of a step-economical synthesis but its
convergency would ensure that it could be amenable to
the practical synthesis of analogues in the search of more
potent cytotoxic therapeutic leads. Herein, we wish to
report the formal syntheses of both (()-brussonol and (()-
abrotanone via an intramolecular Friedel-Crafts/Marson-
type cyclization.9,10
As delineated in Scheme 2, our initial approach was
based on the successful union of epoxide 8 and isopro-
pylveratrol 7 via an ortho-directed metalation reaction.11
Synthons 8 and 7 should be both readily obtained starting
from commercially available 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1-one
10 and veratrol 12. Once this coupling was completed, it
could be envisioned that acetal 5 would arise in a single
step from an oxidation of the terminal alkene moiety of 6
via the aldehyde intermediate in the presence of MeOH.
Similar to bruguierol C, oxocarbenium formation under
Lewis acidic conditions followed by an intramolecular
Friedel-Crafts capture of the oxocarbenium cation inter-
mediate should provide 4, thus constituting a formal
synthesis of (()-brussonol. Subsequent cleavage of the
methoxy phenyl ethers should provide 1 and an ensuing
oxidation under Sarpong’s conditions should ultimately
afford 3.6
7 and 8. As shown in Scheme 3, the preparation of epoxide
8 commenced with a classical Kharasch-type reaction with
the R,ꢀ-unsaturated ketone 10.12 Under the conditions de-
scribed by Reetz,13 copper-catalyzed (5 mol % of CuI·2LiCl)
conjugate addition of MeMgCl to ketone 10 in the presence
of TMSCl provided silyl enol ether 11 in 91% yield which
was used without further purification.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Epoxide 8
With our initial retrosynthetic plan in mind, focus was
placed on the synthesis of the required coupling fragments,
Subsequent treatment of 11 with n-BuLi in the presence
of HMPA followed by electrophilic quench of the corre-
sponding lithium enolate with allyl iodide provided a
mixture of ketone 9 and the O-alkyated allylic ether, which
was then transformed into the desired product 9 by means
of a Claisen rearrangement at elevated temperature in an
overall yield of 63% from enol ether 11. An ensuing
Corey-Chaykovsky epoxidation14 of 9 with the standard
reagents (trimethylsulfonium iodide and the Na salt of the
DMSO anion) delivered the desired coupling partner 8
with an overall yield of 44% over three steps from 10.
Much to our delight, nucleophilic addition of the corre-
sponding trimethyl sulfonium anion to ketone 9 led to
(5) Simmons, E. M.; Yen, J. R.; Sarpong, R. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2705.
(6) Majetich, G.; Zou, G. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 81.
(7) (a) Jennings, M. P.; Clemens, R. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2021.
(b) Ding, F.; Jennings, M. P. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2321. (c) Clemens, R. T.;
Jennings, M. P. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2720. (d) Sawant, K. B.; Jennings,
M. P. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7911. (e) Sawant, K. B.; Ding, F.; Jennings,
M. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 939. (f) Sawant, K. B.; Ding, F.; Jennings,
M. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5177. (g) Ding, F.; Jennings, M. P. J.
Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5965.
(8) Solorio, D. M.; Jennings, M. P. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6621.
(9) Marson, C. M.; Campbell, J.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Abdul Mailk, K. M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1122
.
(10) (a) Fan, J.-F.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Y.-L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1
1999, 1189. (b) Wu, Y.; Li, Y.; Wu, Y.-L. HelV. Chim. Acta 2001, 84,
163
.
(11) Snieckus, V. Chem. ReV. 1990, 90, 879.
190
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 1, 2009