C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2. Rationale for the Z-Selectivity
Table 2. Vanadium-Catalyzed Mannich-type Addition
Attempts to use an enecarbamate as a “masked” imine proved
unsuccessful, providing no reaction.6
To test whether the chirality of starting material was transferred
to the addition product, an enantiomerically enriched propargylic
alcohol 6 was prepared.7 The addition product 7 was obtained in
65% yield, but it showed virtually no enantiomeric excess,
indicating that the vanadium-catalyzed addition occurred in a
nonstereospecific manner under the given conditions (eq 3).8
In summary, the 2-acylallylic carbamates are accessible by an
atom-economic strategy from terminal acetylene, aldehyde, and
N-acylimines by a series of addition reactions by taking advantage
of the ability of oxovanadium complex to induce [3.3] sigmatropic
rearrangement from propargylic alcohols. The optimized conditions
were successfully applied to a range of propargylic alcohols and
aromatic imines. The products of the current reaction, the â-aryl-
substituted Z-enone compounds containing an allylic amino func-
tionality, are not readily accessible with other methods, including
the aza-Baylis-Hillman reaction.9
tris[tri(4-chlorophenyl)silyl]vanadate 1b gave the most desirable
result, providing the Mannich-type addition product 4 in 92% yield
with no noticeable amount of 5. Remarkably, 1b catalyzed the
desired addition reaction even without using the slow addition
procedure (entry 5). In general, better results were obtained with
slower addition of 2 (entries 3-5). The yield eroded when 2.5 mol
% of the catalyst was employed instead of 5 mol % (entry 6). The
vanadium complex 1c showed good performance as well, providing
the addition product in 81% yield, using a slow addition technique
(entry 8). On the other hand, the reaction with the complex 1d was
not as clean as with the other two complexes and produced many
byproducts, including the Meyer-Schuster product in 11% yield
(entry 7).
Adopting the optimized reaction conditions used in entry 3 of
Table 1 as our standard, the variation of the propargylic alcohols
and imines was explored (Table 2).5 All the alcohol substrates
bearing an aryl group at the propargylic position participated well
in the reaction, providing the Mannich-type addition product in good
yield. Unlike the aldehyde addition, the effect of the electronic
character of 2 was not pronounced (entries 5 and 6). Imines with
both electron-donating groups (entries 7 and 8) and electron-
withdrawing groups (entry 9) gave the addition product in moderate
to good yield. Imines containing heteroaromatic groups were also
examined. The imine derived from furfuraldehyde gave the addition
product in somewhat low yield, possibly due to the thermal
instability of the imine (entry 10). On the other hand, the thiophene-
containing imine gave the adduct in high yield (entry 11). The imine
derived from cinnamaldehyde participated moderately well, provid-
ing the 1,2-addition product in 50% yield (entry 12).
Acknowledgment. We thank the National Institutes of Health
(GM13598) for their generous financial support. C.K.C. thanks John
Stauffer Foundation and Eli Lilly & Co. for a graduate fellowship.
Mass spectra were provided by the Mass Spectrometry Facility,
University of San Francisco, supported by the NIH Division of
Research Resources.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
spectroscopic data (PDF). This material is available free of charge via
References
(1) (a) Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254, 1471. (b) Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 259.
(2) For propargyl alcohol reactions, see: (a) Trost, B. M.; Oi, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2001, 123, 1230. For allenic alcohol reactions, see: (b) Trost, B.
M.; Jonasson, C.; Wucher, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12736. (c)
Trost, B. M.; Jonasson, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2063.
(3) (a) Meyer, K. H.; Schuster, K. Chem. Ber. 1922, 55, 819. (b) Swaminat,
S.; Narayana, K. V. Chem. ReV. 1971, 71, 429.
(4) Pauling, H.; Andrews, D. A.; Hindley, N. C. HelV. Chim. Acta 1976, 59,
1233.
(5) The imines were prepared according to (a) Kupfer, R.; Meier, S.;
Wurthwein, E. U. Synthesis 1984, 688.
Notably, the addition reaction produced only Z-enones in all
examples. The complete stereoselectivity for the Z-olefin isomer
could be explained by a staggered geometry of the allenoate
structure D (Scheme 2). The approach from the hydrogen-
substituted face (D-b), which leads to Z-enone product F-b, should
be favored over the approach from the aryl-substituted face (D-a)
on steric grounds.
(6) Koradin, C.; Polborn, K.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
2535.
(7) Frantz, D. E.; Fassler, R.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122,
1806.
(8) The nearly complete racemization indicates that the rearrangement may
proceed through an ion-pair intermediate involving a propargylic cation,
instead of a cyclic transition state. For a similar nonstereospecific
oxometal-catalyzed transformation, see: Sherry, B. D.; Radosevich, A.
T.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6076.
(9) Shi, Y. L.; Xu, Y. M.; Shi, M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1220.
The imine derived from pivaldehyde only led to the formation
of the Meyer-Schuster product (44%) and simple adduct (37%).
JA064011P
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 32, 2006 10359