Scheme 1. Synthesis of Difficult Sequences through a Ring Contraction Strategya
a Reagents and conditions: (i) 1 equiv of BOP, 1 mM in DMF, 2 equiv of DIEA, 3 h/rt. (ii) 10 equiv of DIEA, 20 h/rt. (iii) hυ, 1% HOAc
in DMSO, 1:1, 2 h.
trapoxin,3,5 the tyrosinase inhibitor cyclo-[(L)Pro-(L)Tyr-(L)-
Pro-(L)Val], and the antimalarial apicidins.6 One compound
is reported to show in vivo activity by both parenteral and
oral administration in mice.7
monocyclic target, even when cyclization is performed at
high dilution or the sequence is rotated for optimal cycliza-
tion yield.14 The problem becomes more prominent for
shorter medium-sized ring peptides.14
Cyclic tetrapeptides are very rigid 12-membered-ring
structures. Different conformers of these molecules have been
isolated, and these have been shown to display differing
biological activities.8 Although isolation and structure de-
termination of these compounds has taken place over the
past three decades, there has been little success in synthesiz-
ing representative compounds. This is surprising, given that
cyclic tetrapeptides may be considered a rich source of drug
like molecules due to their wide-ranging biological activities,
low molecular weight, favorable pharmacokinetic charac-
teristics, and unique 12-atom cyclic backbone, providing a
rigid framework that can support a wide range of functional
groups.
The ring strain inherent in this framework makes the
synthesis of these molecules very difficult.13 The primary
reason for ineffective cyclization originates from a sequence-
related inefficiency to bring the termini together for cycliza-
tion.14 Because peptide bonds contain strong π-character and
preferentially adopt a trans conformation, linear peptides
prefer a more extended conformation. Incorporation of turn-
inducing elements such as Gly, Pro, or D-amino acids are
known to enhance cyclization yields.15 As a result, the few
cyclic tetrapeptides that have been synthesized contain either
D-residues or at least one tertiary amide in the sequence.2-11
Small head-to-tail cyclic peptides that do not contain turn-
inducing elements are known to be very difficult to
synthesize,14-16 as macrocyclization of the linear sequences
produce linear and cyclic oligomers in preference to the
In a previous report, the development of a novel ring-
contraction auxiliary that could be used to facilitate the room
temperature cyclization of difficult cyclic pentapeptide
sequences was described.17 It was anticipated that this
approach could also be applied to yield 12-membered cyclic
tetrapeptides. Cyclization of a 2-hydroxy-6-nitrobenzyl (HnB)
N-terminally substituted tetrapeptide 2 would initially gener-
ate a more accessible but reactive cyclic nitrophenylester
intermediate 3 (Scheme 1), which would ring contract
through an O-to-N acyl transfer to generate the desired,
substituted, target compound 4. Photolytic removal of the
HnB auxiliary would provide the target cyclic product 5.
When this strategy was applied to the tetrapeptide [HnB]-
Tyr-Arg-Phe-Gly-OH 2a none of the desired cyclic product
4a was obtained when cyclization was conducted at room
temperature. Fortunately, cyclization to 4a could be achieved
through formation of the nitrophenyl ester intermediate 3a,
followed by further addition of DIEA and heating at 70 °C
overnight. This cyclic product is not accessible from the
unsubstituted H-Tyr-Arg-Phe-Gly-OH 1 sequence. The extra
thermal energy must be required to overcome various ring
strain elements in the formation of the 12-membered-ring
products, despite the higher effective concentration of the
C- and N-termini and the entropic advantages when using
HnB for cyclization. This strategy has subsequently proven
to be useful in the synthesis of a variety of glycine-containing
cyclic tetrapeptides. However, glycine is a CR-unsubstituted
amino acid, and its presence in a cyclic peptide should greatly
(12) Horton, D. A.; Bourne, G. T.; Smythe, M. L. Chem. ReV. 2003,
103, 893-930.
(16) (a) Ehrlich, A.; Heyne, H. U.; Winter, R.; Beyermann, M.; Haber,
H.; Carpino, L. A.; Bienert, M. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 8831-8838. (b)
Bourne, G. T.; Meutermans, W. D. F.; Alewood, P. F.; McGeary, R. P.;
Scanlon, M.; Watson, A. A.; Smythe, M. L. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 3095-
3101.
(17) (a) Meutermans, W. D.; Golding, S. W.; Bourne, G. T.; Miranda,
L. P.; Dooley, M. J.; Alewood, P. F.; Smythe, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 9790-9796. (b) Miranda, L. P.; Meutermans, W. D. F.; Smythe,
M. L.; Alewood, P. F. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5460-5468.
(13) Cavelier-Frontin, F.; Achmad, S.; Verducci, J.; Jacquier, R.; Pepe,
G. THEOCHEM 1993, 105, 125-130.
(14) (a) Schmidt, U.; Langner, J. J. Pept. Res. 1997, 49, 67-73. (b)
Pastuszak, J.; Gardner, J. H..; Singh, J.; Rich, D. H. J. Org. Chem. 1982,
47, 2982-2987. (c) Horton, D. A.; Bourne, G. T.; Smythe, M. L. J. Comput.-
Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 415-430.
(15) Kessler, H.; Haase, B. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1992, 39, 36-40.
2712
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 15, 2003