Diego Savoia et al.
FULL PAPERS
250 nm); retention times: 10.7 min (major enantiomer), References
14.9 min (minor enantiomer).
17a: yield: 88%, ee: 97%; [a]20: À38.7 (c 2.0, CHCl3). The
ee was determined by chiral HPDLC (Chiralpak AD; 2-prop-
anol/hexane 3:97; 1.0 mLminÀ1, 250 nm); retention times:
16.6 min (major enantiomer), 17.1 min (minor enantiomer).
The absolute configuration of the product was determined
by comparison of its optical rotation with that of the known
compound.[13e]
[1] a) A. Togni, L. M. Venanzi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl. 1994, 33, 497–526; b) F. Fache, E. Schulz, M. Lor-
raine Tommasino, M. Lemaire, Chem. Rev. 2000, 100,
2159–2231; c) Chiral Diaza Ligands for Asymmetric
Synthesis (Eds.: M. Lemaire, P. Mangeney), Springer,
Berlin, 2005.
[2] G. Desimoni, G. Faita, P. Quadrelli, Chem. Rev. 2003,
103, 3119–3154.
[3] M. K. Tse, C. Döbler, S. Bhor, M. Klawonn, W. Mäger-
lein, H. Hugl, M. Beller, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004,
43, 5255–5260.
[4] S. Bhor, G. Anilkumar, M. K. Tse, M. Klawonn, C.
Döbler, B. Bitterlich, A. Grotevendte, M. Beller, Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 3393–3396.
[5] a) S. De Martin, G. Zassinovich, G. Mestroni, Inorg.
Chim. Acta 1990, 174, 9–11; b) G. Zassinovich, G. Mes-
troni, Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1051–1069; c) D. A. Lai-
dler, D. J. Milner, J. Organometal. Chem. 1984, 270,
121–129.
[6] a) K. Bernauer, R. Deschenaux, T. Taura, Helv. Chim.
Acta 1983, 66, 2049–2057. For analogous ligands
having N,N’,N”,O’,O“-pentacoordinate capability, see:
b) K. Bernauer, T. Chuard, H. Stoeckli-Rvans, Helv.
Chim. Acta 1993, 76, 2263–2273; c) K. Bernauer, P.
Pousaz, Helv. Chim. Acta 1984, 67, 797–803; d) analo-
gous ligands can be prepared by reductive amination of
diacetylpyridine with amines: T. J. Lotz, T. A. Kaden,
Helv. Chim. Acta 1978, 61, 1376–1387.
17b: yield: 89%, ee: 99%; [a]20: À48.4 (c 1.5, CHCl3). The
ee was determined by chiral HPDLC (Chiralpak AD; 2-prop-
anol/hexane 1:99, 0.8 mLminÀ1, 250 nm); retention times:
8.3 min (minor enantiomer), 10.9 min (major enantiomer).
The absolute configuration was assumed by analogy with
compound 17a.
19: yield: 40%, ee: 6%; [a]2D0: +5.0 (c 1.1, CHCl3). The ee
was determined by chiral GC: Megadex Chiral column
(25 m, flow rate: 15 mLminÀ1, 508C (2 min), then 38CminÀ1
up to 1908C, FID detection): retention times: 27.2 min
(minor enantiomer), 27.3 min (major enantiomer). The ab-
solute configuration of the product was determined by com-
parison of its optical rotation with that of the known com-
pound.[14]
21: yield: 85%, ee: 28%; [a]20: +6.5 (c 1.2, CHCl3). The
ee was determined by chiral GDC (Megadex Chiral column
(25 m, flow rate: 15 mLminÀ1, isotherm 658C, FID detec-
tion); retention times: 49.5 min (minor enantiomer),
51.6 min (major enantiomer). The absolute configuration of
the product was determined by comparison of its optical ro-
tation with that of the known compound.[15]
23 and 24: The ratio was determined by GC-MS analysis.
The ees of 23 and 24 were determined by chiral HPLC
(Chiralpak OD, 2-propanol/hexane 1:99, 0.5 mLminÀ1,
250 nm); retention times of 24: 14.2 min (major enantio-
mer), 15.1 min (minor enantiomer); retention times of 23:
17.9 (minor enantiomer), 18.8 (major enantiomer).
27: yield: 83%, ee 27%; [a]2D0: À23.5 (c 1.6, CHCl3). The
ee was determined by chiral HPLC (Chiralpak OD, 2-propa-
nol/hexane 5:95, 0.4 mLminÀ1, 250 nm); retention times:
13.7 min (minor enantiomer), 15.6 min (major enantiomer).
The absolute configuration of the product was determined
by comparison of its optical rotation with that of the known
compound.[16b]
[7] a) K. Bernauer, F. Gretillat, Helv. Chim. Acta 1989, 72,
477–481; b) K. Bernauer, F. Gretillat, H. Stoeckli-
Evans, R. Wermuth, Helv. Chim. Acta 1993, 76, 545–
556; c) K. Bernauer, A. Cabort, N. Guicher, H. Stoeck-
li-Evans, G. Suss-Fink, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
2002, 2069–2071.
[8] a) K. Fiore, G. Martelli, M. Monari, D. Savoia, Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 4803–4810; b) F. Ferioli, C.
Fiorelli, G. Martelli, M. Monari, D. Savoia, P. Tobaldin,
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1016–1026.
[9] a) G. Alvaro, G. Martelli, D. Savoia, J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 775–783; b) G. Alvaro, D. Savoia,
Synlett 2002, 651–673.
[10] a) P. D. Bartlett, M. Stiles, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77,
2806–2814; b) S. Panev, V. Dimitrov, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2000, 11, 1517–1528; c) M. E. Jung, R. B.
Blum, Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 3791–3794.
[11] R. R. Rülke, V. E. Kaasjager, P. Wehman, C. J. Elsevier,
P. V. N. M. van Leeuwen, K. Vrieze, J. Fraanje, K. Gou-
bitz, A. L. Spek, Organometallics 1996, 15, 3022–3031.
[12] A. Rauk, L. C. Allen, K. Mislow, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 1970, 400–414.
Supporting Information
Characterization data for compounds 8, 9 and 10. Table with
bond lengths and angles for the cation (10ae’)
(allyl)Pd+.
1
A
1H NMR of the salt [(10ae’)
COSY of the salts [(10ae’)(1,3-diphenylallyl)Pd]
[(10ba’)(1,3-diphenylallyl)Pd][PF6].
C
ACHTREUNG
1
AHCTREUNG
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
[13] a) S. Vyskocil, M. Smrcina, V. Hanus, M. Polásek, P.
ˇ
´
Kocovsky, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7738–7748; b) T.
Mino, Y. Tanaka, M. Sakamoto, T. Fujita, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2001, 12, 2435–2440; c) Y. Matsushima, K.
Onitsuka, T. Kondo, T. Mitsudo, S. Takahashi, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10405–10406; d) T. Yamagishi,
M. Ohnuki, T. Kiyooka, D. Masui, K. Sato, M. Yama-
guchi, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 3275–3279;
e) X. Chen, R. Guo, Y. Li, G. Chen, C.-H. Yeung,
A. S. C. Chan, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 213–
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out in the field of the Prin Project
“Sintesi e stereocontrollo di molecole organiche per lo svilup-
po di metodologie innovative”. A. G. held a scholarship from
GSK (Verona). We also thank the University of Bologna for
financial support.
1892
© 2006 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1883 – 1893