C. De Savi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 271–277
277
bioavailability and therefore fraction absorbed (Fabs) was moderate
to poor for compound 21 (Fabs = 28% and 46% in dog and rat,
respectively) but relatively consistent, whereas Fabs was acceptable
for compound 14 in dog (50%), but very poor in rat.
Hargreaves (AZ) for crystallisation. And final thanks to John G.
Cumming (AZ) for technical suggestions and proof-reading the
manuscript. We would like to thank both Paul Turner and Andy
Stanier for compound synthesis.
For human dose predictions, the average of the two values
across rat and dog was used for each compound (37% and 26%
for compounds 21 and 14, respectively). Clearly, human absorption
is the most significant risk for compound 14 with a possibility that
it will be as bad as that observed in rat. For compound 21 the mag-
nitude of the likely efficacious dose itself is the biggest risk factor.
However, this is driven principally by a clearance prediction based
on an undetectable metabolic rate in human hepatocytes; an assay
better able to quantify very low Clint values is likely to cause the
dose estimate to be adjusted to a lower level.
As the combination of free fraction, potency and human half-life
was not quite acceptable for once daily administration for either
compound, the use of a BID dosing regimen is expected to mini-
mise total daily dose and free Cmax, thereby reducing the risk of
off-target toxicity.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Kiani, C.; Chen, L.; Wu, Y. J.; Yee, A. J.; Yang, B. B. Cell Res. 2002, 12, 19.
2. De Savi, C.; Morley, A. D.; Ting, A.; Nash, I.; Karabelas, K.; Wood, C. M.; James,
M.; Norris, S. J.; Karoutchi, G.; Rankine, N.; Hamlin, G.; MacFaul, P. A.; Ryan, D.;
Baker, S. V.; Hargreaves, D.; Gerhardt, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 21, 4215.
3. McGinnity, D. F.; Parker, A. J.; Soars, M.; Riley, R. J. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2000, 28,
1327.
4. Hansch, C.; Muir, R. M.; Fujita, T.; Maloney, P.; Geiger, E.; Streich, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 2817.
5. Leeson, P. D.; Springthorpe, B. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2007, 6, 881.
6. Buttar, D.; Colclough, N.; Gerhardt, S.; MacFaul, P. A.; Phillips, S. D.; Plowright,
A.; Whittamore, P.; Tam, K.; Maskos, K.; Steinbacher, S.; Steuber, H. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2010, 18, 7486.
Compounds 14 and 21 show excellent selectivity over other
MMPs and ADAMTS enzymes tested, good to excellent solubility,
low in vitro clearance in both human microsomes and hepatocytes,
no hERG liability; they, are free from Cyp inhibition across five Cyp
isoforms and have excellent free levels. Due to the basic nature of
the quinuclidine moiety both compounds were tested in our in-
house phospholipidosis assay.12 Although both compounds are
weak inhibitors, compound 21 has a far superior profile with an
7. Soars, M. G.; Grime, K.; Sproston, J. L.; Webborn, P. J. H.; Riley, R. J. Drug Metab.
Dispos. 2007, 35, 859.
8. The sitemap for MMP13 was generated based on MMP13 crystal structure (PDB
ID: 2YIG) using the Maestro molecular modelling program. The model of 21
and 22 were built based on the crystal structure conformation of 1, then
optimised in Macromodel and overlaid into the MMP13 structure and site map
for hypothesis generation. Macromodel and Maestro were licensed from
9. Diastereomers 21 and 22 were separated by chiral HPLC. Full experimental for
the preparation and analytical data for both compounds 21 and 22 can be
found in Supplementary data.
10. An in house crystal structure of diastereoisomers 21/22 in MMP13 (2.2 Å) was
generated and deposited into the RCSB Protein data bank (PDB ID: 4a7b)
as 1 (PDB ID: 2YIG) for the common core of the compounds, with the same H-
bond interactions around the amide and hydroxyquinuclidine with the
proteins. The electron density around the sulfonepyran-3yl is less well
defined than the rest of ligand which indicate flexibility or movement
around this group. Acetohydroxamic acid (added as part of the protein work
up for crystallisation) was chelated to the zinc in the crystal structure.
11. Unpublished results.
EC50 >100 l
M. These could represent excellent candidates13 to test
the clinical hypothesis that non-zinc binding selective MMP13
inhibitors could protect cartilage from type-II collagen degradation
and be free from musculoskeletal effects seen for other Zn-binding
MMP13 inhibitors that have faltered in the clinic.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Linette Ruston (AstraZeneca), David
Berry (Medicines Evaluation, AZ) and Mark E. Light (University of
Southampton) for growing and solving small molecule X-ray crys-
tal structures for representative compounds. We would also like to
thank Liz Flavell (AZ) who produced the MMP13 protein and David
12. Morelli, J. K.; Buehrle, M.; Pognan, F.; Barone, L. R.; Fieles, W.; Ciaccio, P. J. Cell
Biol. Toxicol. 2006, 22, 15.
13. Due to internal disease area strategy re-prioritisation, no further pre-clinical/
clinical profiling of compounds 14 and 21 was undertaken.