A. Guirado et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 3809–3812
Table 1. One-pot synthesis of compounds 7
3811
Entry
Y
R
Ar
Yield (%)
Mp (°C)
7a
7b
7c
7d
7e
O
S
S
S
O
C6H5CH2
C6H5CH2
C6H5CH2
C6H5CH2
(CH3)2CH
C6H5
C6H5
4-CH3OC6H4
4-ClC6H4
4-O2NC6H4
92
88
90
94
97
164–165
172–174
173 (dec.)
167
119–121
The reasons for the difference in behaviour between
intermediates 2 and 5 can be explained if we consider
that ureas and thioureas are attacked10 by electrophilic
agents preferentially at the oxygen or sulfur atoms,
respectively. This is mainly attributable to a high elec-
tron density on such heteroatoms. This is the case for
the formation of products 7 from intermediates 5. The
formation of products 4 from intermediates 2, however,
seems to be in agreement with the strong electron
withdrawing effect of the sulfonyl group, which would
substantially decrease the nucleophilicity of those reac-
tive centres.
2. Guirado, A.; Andreu, R.; Ga´lvez, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1999, 40, 8163.
3. Unpublished results.
4. For reviews, see: (a) Wiley, R. H.; Bennett, L. L. Chem.
Rev. 1949, 44, 447; (b) Seeliger, W.; Aufderhaar, E.;
Diepers, W.; Feinauer, R.; Nehring, R.; Their, W.; Hell-
mann, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1966, 5, 875; (c)
Frump, J. A. Chem. Rev. 1971, 71, 483; (d) Meyers, A. I.;
Mihelich, E. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1976, 15,
270; (e) Reuman, M.; Meyers, A. I. Tetrahedron 1985, 41,
837; (f) Maryanoff, B. E. In Chemistry of Heterocyclic
Compounds; Turchi, I., Ed. Oxazoles. John Wiley & Sons:
Chichester, 1986; Vol. 45, p. 963; (g) Gant, T. G.;
Meyers, A. I. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2297.
In summary, the first direct conversion of 2-oxazolines
into either 1,3-oxazolidines 7 (Y=O) or 1,3-thiazolidi-
nes 7 (Y=S) is reported. Versatility, good yields, easy
availability of starting materials, mildness and simple
experimental procedure are noteworthy advantages of
this approach, which has high prospects in the access to
previously unattainable compounds. In this work a new
reaction mode has been found which is associated to a
peculiar molecular arrangement of 4-amino-2-oxazoline
ureido derivatives. It seems feasible to extend the
described synthetic methodology for preparing a wide
variety of heterocyclic compounds.
1
5. IR and H NMR spectra for crude and crystalline prod-
ucts were recorded showing negligible differences.
6. All compounds gave satisfactory microanalyses. Spectral
data for 7a and 7b are reported as examples of spectro-
scopic properties of these classes of compound. Com-
pound 7a: 1H NMR l (DMSO-d6, 200 MHz): 4.63 (d,
1H, J=16.1 Hz), 4.84 (dd, 1H, J=9.6 Hz, J=3.6 Hz),
5.10 (t, 1H, J=9.3 Hz), 5.52 (d, 1H, J=16.0 Hz), 6.00
(td, 1H, J=9.4 Hz, J=3.3 Hz), 7.23–7.60 (m, 13H), 7.90
(d, 2H, J=7.0 Hz), 9.82 (d, 1H, J=8.1 Hz); 13C NMR l
(DMSO-d6, 50.4 MHz): 45.46 (CH2), 64.87 (CH), 74.02
(CH2), 119.58 (CH), 124.07 (CH), 126.51 (C), 126.95
(CH), 127.68 (CH), 128.10 (CH), 128.47 (CH), 128.68
(CH), 129.23 (CH), 132.26 (CH), 132.87 (C), 134.07 (C),
158.71 (CꢀN), 166.90 (CO); MS; m/z (%): 371 (M+−HCl,
1), 250 (1), 226 (2), 181 (2), 145 (77), 117 (63), 105 (43),
90 (100), 77 (61); IR (Nujol): 3212, 3185, 1682, 1665,
1596, 1531, 1462, 1378, 1278, 1153, 1070, 997, 944, 839,
767 cm−1. Compound 7b: 1H NMR l (DMSO-d6, 200
MHz): 3.46 (dd, 1H, J=11.9 Hz, J=2.8 Hz), 3.91 (dd,
1H, J=11.9 Hz, J=7.8 Hz), 4.71 (d, 1H, J=15.9 Hz),
5.49 (d, 1H, J=15.9 Hz), 6.17 (td, 1H, J=8.0 Hz, J=2.8
Hz), 7.33–7.63 (m, 14H), 7.91 (d, 2H, J=7.1 Hz), 9.75 (d,
1H, J=8.0 Hz); 13C NMR l (DMSO-d6 50.4 MHz):
33.85 (CH2), 48.81 (CH2), 70.35 (CH), 125.33 (CH),
127.86 (CH), 127.99 (CH), 128.37 (CH), 128.78 (CH),
129.64 (CH), 132.10 (CH), 133.09 (C), 134.64 (C), 166.74
(CO); MS; m/z (%): 387 (M+−HCl, 11), 266 (44), 240
(45), 182 (20), 167 (76), 148 (24), 121 (27), 105 (63), 91
(100), 77 (68), 65 (22); IR (Nujol): 3146, 2692, 1650, 1626,
One-pot synthesis of compounds 7. Typical procedure:
To a well stirred solution of aminooxazoline 1 (1 mmol)
in dry ether (10 mL) a solution of the corresponding
isocyanate or isothiocyanate (1 mmol) in dry ether (10
mL) was added dropwise, and the reaction mixture was
stirred at room temperature for 1 h. Then, hydrochlorid
acid (0.15 mL; 35%) was added and the solid product
was filtered off and crystallized from the appropriate
solvent: compound 7a (ethanol), 7b (acetonitrile), 7c
(ethanol), 7d (methanol), 7e (ethanol–pentane).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia
y Tecnolog´ıa (Project BQU2000-0222). We are grateful
to Professor Peter G. Jones at Technische Universita¨t
Braunschweig for the X-ray crystallographic analyses.
1587, 1519, 1487, 1463, 1378, 1181, 766, 700 cm−1
.
7. Details of the structure determination will be reported in
a future full paper.
8. Guirado, A.; Andreu, R.; Cerezo, A.; Ga´lvez, J. Tetra-
hedron 2001, 39, 4925.
References
9. See for example: Ciba-Geigy Corporation (1993), US
Patent 5,229,405; Egls Gyogyszergyar (1987), US Patent
4,665,083; ICI Americas Inc. (1989), US Patent
1. (a) Guirado, A.; Andreu, R.; Ga´lvez, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 1071; (b) Guirado, A.; Andreu, R.; Ga´lvez, J.;
Jones, P. G. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 9853.