J. CHEM. RESEARCH (S), 1998 127
Table 1 Hydroboration of 5b-androst-3-enes
Substrate
Product
Yield (%)
17b-Acetoxy-5b-androst-3-ene (1)
3a,17b-dihydroxy-5b-androstane
3b,17b-dihydroxy-5b-androstane
4a,17b-dihydroxy-5b-androstane
4a,17b-dihydroxy-5b-androstane
17b-hydroxy-5a-androstane
4a,17b-dihydroxy-5a-androstane (3)
4b,17b-dihydroxy-5b-androstane (4)
3a,5b,17b-trihydroxyandrostane
4b,5b,17b-trihydroxyandrostane
11
29
5.5
31.5
3
41
6
22
27
17b-Acetoxy-5b-hydroxyandrost-3-ene (2)
ꢂH (CDCl3) 0.74 (3 H, s, 18-H), 0.81 (3 H, s, 19-H), 3.45 (1 H, dt,
J 4.6 and 10.6 Hz, 4B-H), 3.63 (1 H, t, J 8.6 Hz, 17ꢁ-H); (ii) 3ꢀ,17ꢀ-
dihydroxy-5ꢀ-androstane (541 mg), needles, mp 162±164 8C (lit.,11
165±167 8C), ꢂH (CDCl3) 0.71 (3 H, s, 18-H), 0.96 (3 H, s, 19-H),
3.61 (1 H, t, J 8.6 Hz, 17ꢁ-H), 4.08 (1 H, pent, J 4.3 Hz, 3ꢁ-H);
(iii) 4ꢀ,17ꢀ-dihydroxy-5ꢀ-androstane (4) (580 mg), needles, mp
176±178 8C (lit.,12 177±178 8C), ꢂH (CDCl3) 0.73 (3 H, s, 18-H), 0.99
(3 H, s 19-H), 3.64 (1 H, t, J 8.6 Hz, 17ꢁ-H), 3.87 (1 H, dt, J 5.1
and 10.7 Hz, 4ꢁ-H); and (iv) 3ꢁ,17ꢀ-dihydroxy-5ꢀ-androstane
(204 mg), prisms, mp 236±238 8C (lit.,11 237±238 8C), ꢂH (CDCl3)
0.73 (3 H, s, 18-H), 0.94 (3 H, s, 19-H), 3.64 (2 H, m, 3ꢀ- and
17ꢁ-H).
(b) Under similar conditions 17b-acetoxy-5b-hydroxyandrost-3-
ene (1 g) gave successively (i) 17b-hydroxy-5a-androstane (31 mg),
plates, mp 163±165 8C (lit.,11 164±166 8C), dH (CDCl3) 0.73 (3 H,
s, 18-H), 0.91 (3 H, s, 19-H), 3.64 (1 H, t, J 8.6 Hz, 17a-H);
(ii) 4a,17b-dihydroxy-5a-androstane (3) (364 mg), needles, mp
231±233 8C (lit.,12 235±237 8C), dH (CDCl3) 0.73 (3 H, s, 18-H), 0.81
(3 H, s, 19-H), 3.42 (1 H, dt, J 4.6 and 10.7 Hz), 3.63 (1 H, t,
5b-hydroxy group, that is participating in the elimination
reaction.
The stereochemistry of this process was studied further
by examining the fate of
a deuterium atom at C-3
in the substrate. 3-Deuterio-5b,17b-dihydroxyandrost-3-ene
was prepared by carrying out the Wharton reaction with
deuteriohydrazine. The 1H NMR spectrum of the product
established the presence of deuterium at C-3. The 4-H
resonance at dH 5.53 now appeared as a singlet whilst there
was no signal at dH 5.81 corresponding to H-3. The hydro-
boration and oxidation were repeated. In the 1H NMR
spectra of the resultant deuteriated C-4 alcohols 3 and 4,
the 4-H signal in 3 (dH 3.42) had collapsed from a triplet
(J 10.7 Hz) of doublets (J 4.5 Hz) to a doublet (J 10.7 Hz) of
doublets (J 4.5 Hz), whilst in 4 the 4-H signal (dH 3.87) had
changed from a triplet (J 10.7 Hz) of doublets (J 5.1 Hz) to
a triplet (J 10.7 Hz). In both cases the C-3 deuterium
atom had taken up the C-3a con®guration. A plausible
explanation for these results is given in Scheme 1(c). A bori-
nate ester is formed from the 5b-hydroxy group. The borane
then adds to the anti face at C-4 but undergoes a facile
trans diaxial borane±borinate elimination with the internal
transfer of hydride from the borinate group. Thus the
hydrogen atom which was introduced at C-3 was on the
same side of the molecule as the departing 5b-hydroxy
group. Part of the driving force for this particularly facile
elimination may be the relief of interactions between the
4a-substituent and the a-face of ring B in a 5b-steriod.
The hydration that is observed at C-4 has taken place from
the b-face of the molecule where these steric factors do not
apply. In this particular situation the steric constraints of
the ring system have dominated the anti-directing eect of
the hydroxy group.
J
8.6 Hz); (iii) 4b,17b-dihydroxy-5b-androstane (4) (52 mg), mp
178±181 8C, identical with the material described above; (iv)
4b,5b,17b-trihydroxyandrostane (255 mg) prisms, mp 210±212 8C
(Found: C, 73.3; H, 10.4. C19H32O3 requires C, 74.0; H, 10.5%),
1
ꢃ
max/cm 3403, 3375; dH (CDCl3) 0.74 (3 H, s, 18-H), 0.97 (3 H, s,
19-H), 3.64 (1 H, t, J 8.5 Hz, 17a-H), 4.02 (1 H, dd, J 6.5
and 11.2 Hz, 4a-H); (v) 3a,5b,17b-trihydroxyandrostane, (203 mg),
prisms, mp 237±239 8C (lit.,11 237±238 8C), dH (CDCl3) 0.73 (3 H, s,
18-H), 0.96 (3 H, s, 19-H), 3.62 (1 H, t, J 8.6 Hz, 17a-H), 4.14 (1 H,
broad s, 3b-H).
We thank Professor Sir John Cornforth for very helpful
discussions. C. U. wishes to thank Kocaeli University,
Izmit, Turkey, for study leave and for ®nancial assistance.
Received, 13th November 1997; Accepted, 27th November 1997
Paper E/7/08181B
Experimental
References
General experimental details have been described previously.3
Steroids were recrystallized from ethyl acetate±petrol mixtures. 17b-
Acetoxy-5b-androst-3-ene (1), prepared from 17b-hydroxyandrost-4-
en-3-one by reduction with hydrazine hydrate and acetylation had
mp 139±142 8C (lit.,6 138±140 8C) whilst 17b-acetoxy-5b-hydroxy-
androst-3-ene (2) prepared by reduction of 17b-acetoxy-4b,5b-
epoxyandrostan-3-one with hydrazine hydrate had mp 119±121 8C
(lit.,9 118±119 8C). 3-Deuterio-5b,17b-dihydroxyandrost-3-ene had
mp 157±159 8C; dH (CDCl3) 0.75 (3 H, s, 18-H), 1.00 (3 H, s,
19-H), 3.63 (1 H, t, J 8.5 Hz, 17a-H), 5.53 (1 H, s, 4-H).
Hydroboration Experiments.Ð(a) 17ꢀ-Acetoxy-5ꢀ-androst-3-ene
(2 g) in dry tetrahydrofuran (50 cm3) was treated with 1 M borane
in tetrahydrofuran (40 cm3) at 0 8C under nitrogen for 4 h. Water
(20 cm3) was added carefully and the solution was then maintained
at 0 8C whilst 10% aqueous sodium hydroxide (40 cm3) was added
dropwise followed by 30% hydrogen peroxide (50 cm3). The mixture
was left to stir overnight. Sodium sul®te (2 g), acetic acid (1 cm3),
water (50 cm3), dilute hydrochloric acid (50 cm3) and ethyl acetate
(100 cm3) were then added. The stirring was continued for a further
15 min. The organic layer was washed with water and brine and
dried over sodium sulfate. The solvent was evaporated to give a
gum which was chromatographed on silica. Elution with 25% ethyl
acetate±light petroleum gave successively (i) 4ꢁ,17ꢀ-dihydroxy-5ꢀ-
androstane (102 mg), prisms, mp 232±234 8C (lit.,12 235±237 8C),
1 H. C. Brown and R. M. Gallivan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1968, 90,
2906.
2 E. Dunkelblum, R. Levene and J. Klein, Tetrahedron, 1972, 28,
1009.
3 J. R. Hanson, P. B. Hitchcock, M. Liman and S. Nagaratnam,
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1995, 2183.
4 M. Alam, J. R. Hanson, M. Liman and S. Nagaratnam,
J. Chem. Res. (S), 1997, 56.
5 H. C. Brown and O. J. Cope, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1964, 86,
1801.
6 A. Crastes de Paulet and J. Bascoul, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 1966,
939.
7 J. McKenna, J. K. Norymberski and R. D. Stubbs, J. Chem.
Soc., 1959, 2502.
8 P. S. Wharton and D. H. Bohlen, J. Org. Chem., 1961, 26, 3615.
9 M. Gorodetsky, N. Danieli and Y. Mazur, J. Org. Chem., 1967,
32, 760.
10 J. E. Bridgeman, P. C. Cherry, A. S. Clegg, J. M. Evans,
Sir Ewart Jones, A. Kasal, V. Kumar, G. D. Meakins,
Y. Morisawa, E. E. Richards and P. D. Woodgate, J. Chem.
Soc. C, 1970, 250.
11 Dictionary of Steroids, ed. R. A. Hill, D. N. Kirk, H. L. Markin
and G. M. Murphy, Chapman and Hall, London, 1992.
12 D. Marcos and H. Rojas, Acta Cient. Venezolana, 1974, 25, 195.