(Rint = 0.0288) Rf = 0.0402 [3570 data Fo > 4s(Fo)], wR(F2) = 0.0980,
S = 1.00. Largest residual density peak (0.32 e Å23) is located close to atom
b202273g/ for crystallographic files in .cif or other electronic format.
symmetry-independent molecules are H-endo isomers [at C(7)].
Similar isomers13 of benzylidene-, alkenylidene-acetals of 1
have been reported. The macrocyclic 16-membered ring can be
expected to accommodate small molecules. Its diagonals
(defined by the O…O distances) range from 4.646(4) to
4.847(4) Å. The macrocyclic 16-membered loop confines a bent
tetragon of shape close to a trapezium with the sides:
1 J. F. Stoddart, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1979, 8, 85; Top.Stereochem., 1987, 17,
207; J. M. Coterón, C. Vicent, C. Bosso and S. Penades, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1993, 115, 10066.
2 P. Bakó, L. Fenichel and L. Toke, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1981,
1163; P. Bakó, L. Fenichel and L. Toke, Acta Chim. Acad. Sci. Hung.,
1978, 98, 357; P. Bakó, L. Fenichel and L. Toke, Acta Chim. Acad. Sci.
Hung., 1982, 111, 297.
3 P. Bakó, E. Czinege, T. Bakó, M. Czugler and L. Toke, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 1999, 10, 4539.
4 M. Pietraszkiewicz, P. Salacinski and J. Jurczak, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1983, 1184; M. Pietraszkiewicz, P. Salacinski and J. Jurczak,
Tetrahedron, 1984, 40, 2967; M. Pietraszkiewicz, P. Salacinski and J.
Jurczak, Tetrahedron, 1984, 40, 2971; M. Pietraszkiewicz, P. Salacinski
and J. Jurczak, J. Carbohydr. Chem., 1985, 4, 429.
5 R. B. Pettman and J. F. Stoddart, Tetrahedron Lett., 1979, 451, 461.
6 D. A. Laidler, J. F. Stoddart and J. B. Wohlstenholme, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1979, 465.
7 M. Pietraszkiewicz and N. Spencer, J. Coord. Chem. B, 1992, 27,
115.
8 M. Pietraszkiewicz and M. Kozbial, J. Ind. Phenom., 1992, 14, 339.
9 M. Pietraszkiewicz, M. Kozbial and O. Pietraszkiewicz, J .Membrane
Sci., 1998, 138, 109 and references cited therein.
O(7a)…O(8a):
4.435(4);
O(4a)…O(3a):
3.057(4);
O(7a)…O(4a): 3.059(4); O(8a)…O(3a): 2.963(4) Å.
The oligomer and polymer fractions were obtained by two
alternative synthetic paths. The acetalation of 1 with salicy-
laldehyde 2 under acid-catalysed (PVP–TsOH) conditions
yields a mixture of diastereoisomers at the acetal position of
1,3-dioxolane rings (in approximately equal amounts).14 Alka-
line-catalysed condensation of methyl 2,3:4,6-di-O-salicyli-
dene-a-
-mannopyranoside14 4 with 1,4-dibromobutane under
D
standard conditions (K2CO3)15 in butyl acetate gave the
expected polycondensates in high yield (87%). A small amount
of 5 (5%) was also isolated after flash column chromatography
purification. The evidence for polymer 6 was confirmed by SEC
analysis (Mn = 800–2100 g mol21). The NMR data of polymer
6 have been used to establish the configuration of a five-
membered acetal ring at C(2) and C(3) of the methyl a- -
D
1
mannopyranoside units in the polymer chain. The H-NMR
spectrum of 6 consists of several sets of bands produced by
acetal protons at 5.4–5.6 and 5.8–6.0 ppm (1,3-dioxane),
6.1–6.2 ppm (H-2 exo 1,3-dioxolane) and 6.4–6.6 ppm (H-endo
1,3-dioxolane). The relative intensities of endo-H and exo-H (in
the 1,3-dioxolan-2yl ring) were 2+1. The characteristic signals
of methoxy, acetal and aromatic protons provide evidence that
the repeating units in the polymer chain consist of one molecule
of 1 and one of 3.
10 T. Kakuchi, O. Haba and K. Yokota, Makromol. Chem., 1991, 192,
1601.
11 J. Maslinska-Solich, Macromol. Biosci., 2001, 1, 312.
12 Synthesis of methyl 2,3(R);4,6(R)-di-O-[2,2(1,4-butoxy)]phenylidene-
a- -mannopyranoside 5. A mixture of 1 (0.01 mol, 1.94 g) and 3 (0.01
D
mol 2.98 g) in benzene (50–100 ml), TsOH (0.05–0.1 g), was subjected
to azeotropic distillation (Dean-Stark). After 20 h the catalyst was
deactivated with CaO and the solvent was removed under reduced
pressure. The white powder of the products was filtered off (analyzed by
TLC, NMR). A mixture of compounds was fractionated on silica gel
(CHCl3:CH3OH 20:1). The solutions were concentrated and the residue
was subjected to low pressure at 80–100 °C/3 mmHg. Appropriate
crystals were obtained by crystallization from ethyl acetate+chloroform
(8+1) and by diffusion of heptane to the 1,4-dioxane solution, mp.229.6
The formation of the macrocycle 5 and polymer 6 can be
discussed on the basis of the dynamic chemistry.16,17 Direct
acid-catalysed acetalation of two bifunctional building blocks 1
and 3 is driven to macrocycle 5 (57% yield) and polymer 6.
Macrocycle formation was efficient under thermodynamic
conditions, whereas the polymer was formed under kinetically
controlled conditions which led to mixture of exo-H and endo-H
(in 1,3-dioxolane) units.
°C, [a]25
= 256.0° (c.1 CHCl3). The residue of polycondensation
546
products was purified by reprecipitation in THF–ethanol, SEC 800–
25
2100 g mol21; [a]546 = +16 to 225.0° (c.1 CHCl3).
Further investigations are in progress in order to confirm the
13 J. Gelas, Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem., 1981, 39, 71 and Z.
Jedlinski, J. Maslinska-Solich and A. Dworak, Carbohydr.Res., 1975,
42, 150.
binding selectivity of methyl a- -mannopyranoside with 1,w-
D
dialdehyde in the formation of macrocyclic diacetals and new
class of sugar polymers.
14 J. Maslinska-Solich, N. Kuznik, M. Sowa and S. Kukowka, Proc. III Int.
Symposium on Polymers, June 2001, Gliwice, Poland.
15 Polycondensation of methyl 2,3+4,6-di-O-salicylidene-a-D-mannopyr-
Notes and references
anoside 4 with 1,4-dibromobutane. A mixture of 4 (6.3 mmol, 2.55 g),
1,4-dibromobutane (6.3 mmol, 1.36 g) and 1.80 g of K2CO3 in 50 ml of
a mixture of DMF–butyl acetate (1+10) was heated at 80 to 100 °C.
After 20 h the mixture was filtered off and solvents were removed under
reduced pressure. The residue 6 was purified by flash chromatogra-
phy.1H NMR (CDCl3) of 6 d 1.80–2.10 (m, CH2), 3.36–3.43(m.,
OCH3), 3.80–4.85 (m, OCH, OCH2), 4.98–5.09(m., OCHO anom),
5.3–5.6 and 5.8–6.0(m OCHO, H-2 dioxan-2-yl), 6.10–6.24(m, OCHO,
H-2 dioxolan-2-yl, exo), 6.42–6.60(m, OCHO, H-2 dioxolan-2-yl, endo
), 6.89–7.04(m., Ar), 7.20–7.42(m, Ar), 7.43–7.72 (m, Ar), 7.80–7.82
(m, Ar), 10.49–10.5 (m, CHO).
† Spectral data of 5: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz, SiMe4) d 1.9–2.2 (m, 4H),
3.4 (s, 3H), 3.8–3.83 (m, 2H), 3.91–4.03 (m, 3H), 4.05–4.15 (m, 3H),
4.24–4.22 (d, J 5.7Hz, 1H), 4.59–4.54 (dd, J5.7 and 8.2 Hz, 1H), 5.07 (s,
1H), 5.89 (s, 1H), 6.54 (s, 1H), 6.86–6.96 (m, 4H), 7.27–7.3 (m, 2H),
7.59–7.52 (dd, 2H) 13C NMR(CDCl3, 75 MHz) d 27.52, 55.09, 59.89,
69.74, 69.87, 75.25, 75.86, 76.34, 98..43, 98.75, 99.29, 113.49, 120.64,
120.94, 125.56, 125.89, 130.24, 157.50, 157.80; satisfactory elemental
analysis obtained.
‡ Crystal data for compound 5: C25 H28 O8, M = 456.47, monoclinic, space
group P21, a = 11.955(2), b = 16.560(3), c = 12.578(3) Å, b =
113.83(3)°, U = 2277.8(8) Å3, Z = 4, T = 293(2) K, m(Cu-Ka) = 0.825
mm21, Dc = 1.331, 3997 reflections measured, of which 3791 independent
16 J. K. M. Sanders, Pure Appl. Chem., 2000, 72, 2265.
17 L. M. Greig and D. Philp, Chem.Soc.Rev., 2001, 30, 287.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 984–985
985