4080
Y. Hayashi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 4079–4082
tion. We have compared the reactivities of these classes
of compounds as Knoevenagel donors.5
difference in reactivity was observed between thioester
and ester. Namely, when this substituent is i-propyl or
cyclohexyl, the reaction of b-ketoesters with aldehydes
affords the condensation products in only low to mod-
erate yields (<5–67%), while moderate to good yields
(56–89%) are obtained in the reaction of the corre-
sponding b-ketothioesters. The same phenomenon was
also observed in the reactions of g,d-unsaturated and
b-aryl derivatives: good yields are obtained in the reac-
tions of S-ethyl 4-methyl-3-oxo-4-hexenethioate and S-
ethyl 3-oxo-3-phenylbutanethioate with aldehydes.
Although a b-ketothioester does not react with a bulky
aldehyde such as 2,2-dimethyl-2-propanal, a b-keto-
thioester reacts both aromatic and the other aliphatic
aldehydes including a linear aldehyde like propanal
(entries 8, 9, 18), an a-branched aldehyde like isobutyl-
aldehyde (entries 6, 11, 20, 24), and an a-alkoxyalde-
hyde like 2-(p-methoxybenzyloxy)propanal (entry 16),
affording the condensation products in good yield. As
the reaction conditions are mild, no self-condensation
products of aldehydes were observed even in the reac-
tion of an enolizable a-alkoxyaldehyde (entry 16). The
amount of an aldehyde can be reduced to 1.5 equiv. to
a b-ketothioester without affecting the yield, although
longer reaction time was necessary (entries 8 and 9).
The reason to use excess amount (4–6 equiv.) of alde-
hydes in some cases is to obtain the condensation
products in good yield in a reduced reaction time when
the reaction is slow.
We chose S-ethyl 3-oxo-3-phenylbutanethioate and
isobutyraldehyde as model substrates and screened
reaction conditions in detail. First of all, the catalyst
was examined, and the traditional ammonium ion-
based reagents such as ethylenediammonium diacetate6
were found to be more effective than Lewis acid cata-
lysts.7 Next, the dehydrating reagent and solvent were
investigated. The results are summarized in Table 2.
For molecular sieves the pave size affected the yield
considerably, and MS 5A was found to be the most
effective. Dichloromethane was the solvent of choice.
Thus, when the reaction was performed in the presence
of MS 5A and 10 mol% of ethylenediammonium diac-
etate in CH2Cl2 at rt for 6 h, the Knoevenagel adduct
was obtained in good yield (92%) with high E-selectiv-
ity (E:Z=91:9, entry 9).8 Under the same reaction
conditions, however, the reaction of the corresponding
b-ketoester, ethyl 3-oxo-3-phenylbutanoate, was slow,
affording the condensation product in moderate yield
(68%) with the same E/Z selectivity (E:Z=90:10, entry
10). Since the superiority of the b-ketothioester as a
Knoevanagel donor over the b-ketoester was confirmed
in this model reaction, the generality of this finding was
examined using several b-ketothioesters and b-
ketoesters with various aldehydes, and these results are
summarized in Table 3.9
When the b-substituent of the thioester or ester is small
(methyl), there is little difference in reactivity between
the two derivatives and both afford the adducts in good
yields, in short reaction time (3 h), as shown by the
reactions of S-ethyl 3-oxobutanethioate and methyl
3-oxobutanoate (entries 1 and 2). When the substituent
at the b-position is large, on the other hand, a marked
E/Z-selectivity is mostly dependent on the substituent
at the b-position, and differed little between b-keto-
thioester and b-ketoester. Low selectivity is observed in
the reactions of both derivatives when the b-substituent
is an alkyl group such as methyl, i-propyl and cyclo-
hexyl, while high E-selectivity is obtained with g,d-
unsaturated and b-aryl b-keto derivatives. The
bulkiness of the substituent on sulfur has a little effect
on selectivity; better Z-selectivity was observed in the
reaction of the S-tert-butyl thioester compared with
that of the S-ethyl thioester (entries 3 and 4).
Table 2. Knoevenagel reaction of b-ketothioester and
isobutyraldehydea
The Knoevenagel reaction consists of two reactions:
The first is the addition of an enolate of an active
methylene compound to an aldehyde, and an elimina-
tion of water is the next reaction.3 The high reactivity
of b-ketothioesters in comparison to b-ketoesters could
be explained as follows: (1) Because of the longer
atomic radius of sulfur than oxygen, there is less steric
repulsion in the reactions of a b-ketothioester, making
it more reactive as a Knoevenagel donor. (2) As the
HOMO level of a vinylsulfide is higher than that of a
vinylether,10 an enolate of a b-ketothioester is expected
to be more reactive than that of a b-ketoester. This is
why the first step becomes more feasible in the reaction
of a b-ketothioester. (3) As the a-proton of a thioester
is more acidic than that of an ester, the second reaction
of an elimination of water becomes fast in the reaction
of a b-ketothioester. At present we were not sure which
effect is predominant in causing the higher reactivity of
b-ketothioesters.
Entry
R
Solvent
Additiveb
Yield (%)c
E:Zd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SEt
SEt
SEt
SEt
SEt
SEt
SEt
SEt
SEt
OEt
Benzene
Benzene
Benzene
Benzene
Benzene
Benzene
MeOH
THF
–
54
55
64
78
23
58
35
47
92
68
92:8
92:8
92:8
91:9
89:11
92:8
90:10
91:9
91:9
90:10
MS 3A
MS 4A
MS 5A
MS 13X
CaSO4
MS 5A
MS 5A
MS 5A
MS 5A
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
10
a Ethylenediammonium diacetate (10 mol %) was used as an acid
catalyst and 2 equiv. of the aldehyde was used.
b 0.2 g of additive was used per 1 mmol of the ester.
c Isolated yield.
d The E:Z ratio was determined by 1H NMR.