yields (Table 1). Notably, after a simple workup and
chromatography, the desired product 3 was easily separated
from n-Bu3SnOP(O)Ph2 and the copper residues. Additional
improvements in yield were obtained using tri-2-furylphos-
phine (TFP) as a supporting ligand in combination with Pd2-
dba3, a catalyst system for which Farina had noted large rate
accelerations in Stille cross-coupling reactions.11,12
Table 1. Model System for the Coupling of Thiol Esters with
Organostannanes
To judge the generality of this new reaction, the cross-
coupling of S-p-tolyl thiol esters with various tri-n-butylor-
ganostannanes was investigated using between 0.65 and 2.5%
of a 1:8 Pd2dba3/TFP catalyst system and 1.2-2.2 equiv of
CuOP(O)Ph2. The results are depicted in Table 2; THF was
Pd source
Pd(PPh3)4
Cu(I) sourcea
yield
60
66
69
CuMeSal
CuMeSal
CuMeSal
CuTC
CuDPP
CuDPP
CuDPP
CuDPP
PdCl2(PPh3)2
PdCl(PPh3)2CH2Ph
PdCl(PPh3)2CH2Ph
Pd(PPh3)4
PdCl2(PPh3)2
PdCl(PPh3)2CH2Ph
Pd2(dba)3/TFPc
Table 2. Cross-Coupling of Thiol Esters and Organostannanes
71
89 (98)b
67 (92)b
88 (97)b
94
a CuTC ) Cu(I) thiophene-2-carboxylate; CuMeSal ) Cu(I) 3-methyl-
salicylate; CuDPP ) Cu(I) diphenylphosphinate. b Yield based on recovered
thiol ester. c TFP ) tri-2-furylphosphine.
entry thiol ester, R1
stannane, R2
p-tolyl
2-furyl
2-thienyl
3-pyridyl
4-pyridyl
2-pyridyl
R1COR2 yield (%)a
1b CH3(CH2)10
2b CH3(CH2)10
3b CH3(CH2)10
4b (E)-â-styryl
5b (E)-â-styryl
6b p-NO2C6H5
7b p-NO2C6H5
8c p-NO2C6H5
9d p-NO2C6H5
10d 2-benzofuranyl 2-pyrazyl
11d 1-adamantyl
12d 2-aminophenyl 2-benzofuranyl
13d 2-acetoxyacetyl 2-benzofuranyl
91
78
73
76
67
70
91
61
69
96
68
93
96
92
81
97
81
thiophene-2-carboxylate (CuTC), copper sources that had
earlier proven to be effective for the palladium-catalyzed
coupling of boronic acids with thiol esters,2 heteroaromatic
thioethers,7 or thioalkynes,8 ketone 3 was generated in
moderate to good yields after 24 h in THF at 45-50 °C.
Cu(I)Cl was ineffective as an additive, promoting only low
conversion to product with various side reactions. No
significant difference in efficiency was noted among the
palladium catalysts Pd(PPh3)4, PdCl2(PPh3)2, and PdCl-
(PPh3)2(CH2Ph), all of which produced ketone 3 in isolated
yields between 60 and 71%.
The reaction workup was tedious, and removal of the tin
residues was not efficient under the conditions mentioned
above.9 In earlier work on Stille cross-coupling reactions
mediated only by copper(I) carboxylates,10 we had noted the
effectiveness of the Ph2P(O)O- counterion in facilitating the
separation of tin residues (as n-Bu3SnOP(O)Ph2) from the
reaction mixture. This led in the current study to the
consideration of Cu(I) diphenylphosphinate (CuDPP) as a
unique mediator for the palladium-catalyzed coupling of thiol
esters with organostannanes. In fact, CuOP(O)Ph2 mediated
the palladium-catalyzed coupling reaction of 1 with 2 in the
presence of 5% Pd(PPh3)4, PdCl2(PPh3)2, or PdCl(PPh3)2(CH2-
Ph) as catalysts to give ketone 3 in good to excellent isolated
1-methyl-2-pyrrolyl
2-pyrimidinyl
2-thiazolyl
3-formyl-4-pyridyl
14e CH3(CH2)10
15e o-tolyl
16e o-tolyl
17e CH3(CH2)10
2-methyl-1-propenyl
2-methyl-1-propenyl
2-thienyl
3-propenyl
a Isolated yields of purified products. b Conditions: 1% Pd2(dba)3, 8%
TFP, 1.2 equiv of CuDPP, THF, 50 °C, 7 h. c Conditions: 2.5% of
Pd2(dba)3, 20% TFP, 1.2 equiv of CuDPP, THF, 50 °C, 7 h. d Conditions:
0.65% Pd2(dba)3, 5.2% TFP, 1.3 equiv of CuDPP, 1:1 THF/hexanes, 40
°C, 18 h. e Conditions: 2.5% of Pd2(dba)3, 20% TFP, 2.2 equiv of CuDPP,
THF, 50 °C, 1-25 h.
used as the solvent. The reaction system shows excellent
generality and delivers good to excellent isolated yields of
ketones from alkyl, aryl, heteroaryl, and functionalized S-p-
tolyl thiol esters and from aryl, heteroaryl, and alkenylstan-
nanes. In general, very good yields are obtained even using
1.2-1.3 equiv of the Cu(I) mediator, although in a few cases
higher loadings were used. Some organotin compounds are
noticeably sensitive to copper-mediated side reactions such
as oxidative homocoupling and protodestannylation, probably
(6) Farina, V.; Krishnamurthy, V.; Scott, W. J. In Organic Reactions;
Paquette, L., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1997; Vol. 50, pp 1-652.
Mitchell, T. N. Synthesis 1992, 803-815. Haddach, M.; McCarthy, J. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3109-3112. Bumagin, N. A.; Korolev, D. N.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3057-3060. Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem.
ReV. 1995, 95, 2457-2483. Goossen, L. J.; Ghosh, K. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 3458-3460. Yamamoto, A. Pure Appl. Chem. 2002, 74, 1-5.
(7) Liebeskind, L. S.; Srogl, J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 979-981.
(8) See Supporting Information for: Savarin, C.; Srogl, J.; Liebeskind,
L. S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3 (1), 91-93.
(11) Farina, V.; Krishnamurthy, V.; Scott, W. J. In Organic Reactions;
Paquette, L., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1997; Vol. 50, pp 1-652.
Mitchell, T. N. Synthesis 1992, 803-815. Stille, J. K. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 508-524.
(9) Neither the standard treatment with KF nor washing with an aqueous
NaOH solution was effective.
(10) Allred, G. D.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2748-
2749.
(12) Farina, V.; Krishnan, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9585-9595.
3034
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 17, 2003