intrinsic C3′-endo conformational preference of the later, does
not allow binding of human RNase H to RNA-DNA hybrid
containing 2-thiothymidine in the DNA part.18 Thus the
advantage of using 2-thiothymidine (as 2′-deoxy) is lost in
antisense applications due to its inability to recruit RNase
H. This makes the combination of a 2′-modification and the
2-thiothymidine preferred. When these two modifications
were combined in one nucleoside residue, as in 2′-O-MOE-
2-thiothymidine, the Tm enhancement for the duplex formed
with complementary RNA was additive.
The oligonucleotide with 2′-deoxy-2′-fluorouridine (15),
which lacks a 5-methyl group relative to 2′-fluoro-thymidine,
stabilized the duplex by 0.6 °C per modification compared
to DNA control 14.17 The loss in thermal stability due to
the lack of a methyl group was 0.6 °C per modification
(16),17 and therefore, one would expect an increase of about
1.2 °C per modification for an oligonucleotide modified with
2′-deoxy-2′-fluorothymidine. The oligonucleotides 11 and 21
containing the 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2-thiothymidine increased
thermal stability of duplex with complementary RNA up to
3.8 °C per modification (Table 1) compared to the unmodi-
fied controls (14 and 22). These results indicate the syner-
gistic stereoelectronic effect of 2-thio and 2′-O-MOE or 2′-F
modifications on enhancement of thermal stability against
complementary RNA. This is in contrast to the 2′-O-methyl-
2-thiouridine modification where no additive effect on
thermal stability was observed.5
These data suggest an RNA selective preorganization and
hybridization of the 2′-O-MOE-2-thiothymidine and 2′-
deoxy-2-thiothymidine modified oligonucleotides.
The susceptibility of oligonucleotides containing novel
modifications to nuclease digestion was evaluated by using
a standard assay with SVPD.19 The enzymatic hydrolysis of
phosphodiester oligonucleotides 23-27, capped at the 3′-
terminus with four modified nucleoside residues, was evalu-
ated. The plot of the time-dependent disappearance of the
novel oligonucleotides and their 2′-deoxy and 2′-O-MOE
analogues is shown in Figure 2. The half-life of the
oligonucleotide with 2′-O-MOE-2-thiothymidine modifica-
tion (23) was over 24 h and showed better resistance to
SVPD than the 2′-O-MOE-thymidine modified oligonucle-
otide (24, Figure 2A). However, the 2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-2-
thiothymidine (26) and the 2′-deoxy-2-thiothymidine (27)
modified oligonucleotides were degraded as rapidly as the
2′-deoxy-oligonucleotide (half-lives between 1.5 and 5 min,
Figure 2B). Thus the replacement of thymine with 2-thio-
thymine did not improve the nuclease resistance of oligo-
nucleotides. On the other hand, when the 2′-O-MOE-2-
thiothymidine (Figure 2A) and the 2′-deoxy-2-thiothymidine
modification (Figure 2B) are compared, it is clear that a
combination of 2′-O-MOE ribose sugar and 2-thio-5-me-
thyluracil in a modified pyrimidine nucleoside provides
enhanced nuclease resistance compared to the corresponding
singly modified nucleoside when incorporated into oligo-
nucleotides..
In conclusion, facile syntheses of 2′-O-MOE-2-thiothy-
midine and 2′-F-2-thiothymidine and their incorporation into
oligonucleotides were demonstrated. The additive effect of
the 2′-O-MOE or 2′-F and the 2-thiothymine modifications
on thermal stability suggests that there is a synergistic
stereoelectronic effect of sugar and base modifications in
preorganizing the modified oligonucleotides to form an
A-type helix. High binding affinity, nuclease stability, and
expected favorable pharmacokinetic properties (due to sulfur
and 2′-O-MOE modifications) warrant further evaluation of
2′-O-MOE-2-thiothymidine modified oligonucleotides for
antisense applications. The remarkably high binding affinity
of 2′-F-2-thiothymidine makes it a good candidate for
hybridization-dependent nontherapeutic applications as well.
Unlike the 2′-O-MOE-thymidine oligonucleotide that
destabilizes a duplex with complementary DNA (19, Table
2) compared to the control oligonucleotide 20, both 2′-O-
Table 2. Effect of the 2′-O-MOE-2-thiothymidine (X),
2′-Deoxy-2-thiothymidine (Z), and 2′-O-MOE-thymidine (t)
Modifications on Stability of Duplexes with Complementary
DNA
seq
no.
Tm,8
∆Tm,
°C/modification
modification
°C
17
18
19
20
X
Z
t
73.50
62.00
42.40
54.20
+1.9
+0.8
-1.2
parent DNA
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. B. S. Ross for helpful
discussions, Dr. E. A. Lesnik for Tm studies, and S. Owens
for help with the nuclease stability assay.
MOE-2-thiothymidine (17, Table 2) and 2′-deoxy-2-thio-
thymidine (18, Table 2) oligonucleotides stabilize the
duplexes with complementary DNA. However, when com-
pared to the duplex with RNA (17 and 18, ∆Tm ) 3.4 and
1.7 °C per modification, respectively, Table 1), the stabiliza-
tion of the duplex with DNA (17 and 18, ∆Tm ) 1.9 and
0.8 °C per modification, respectively, Table 2) was less.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
cedures and spectroscopic data for compounds 2a-8a, 2b-
8b, 10, 11, 17, 21, 23, 26, and 27; procedures used for Tm
and nuclease studies. This material is available free of charge
OL0348607
(16) ∆Tm per modification with respect to thymidine.
(17) Freier, S. M.; Altmann, K.-H. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4429-
4443.
(19) Cummins, L. L.; Owens, S. R.; Risen, L. M.; Lesnik, E. A.; Freier,
S. M.; McGee, D.; Guinosso, C. J.; Cook, P. D. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995,
23, 2019-2024.
(18) Unpublished results (Isis Pharmaceuticals Inc).
3008
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 17, 2003