6706 Cho et al.
Macromolecules, Vol. 36, No. 18, 2003
Ta ble 1. P h ysica l P r op er ties of th e P olym er s
vacuo. The crude oily product was chromatographed on silica
gel with a mixture of ethyl acetate and n-hexane (1/30) as the
eluent to give 27.85 g (57.7% yield) of the product as a viscous
oil: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.58 (br s, 2H), 0.74 (t, 3H), 0.98-1.18
(m, 6H), 1.20-1.65 (m, 6H), 1.92 (m, 2H), 2.32 (t, 2H), 2.73-
3.15 (m, 2H), 3.23-3.47 (m, 2H), 4.10 (t, 1H), 7.41-7.50 (m,
6H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 13.94, 19.29, 22.53, 23.32, 25.30,
29.44, 30.42, 31.41, 39.38, 40.68, 53.89, 61.88, 63.60, 98.68,
121.15, 121.47, 126.49, 130.35, 138.86, 151.71. Anal. Calcd for
feed
ratio
(x/y)
content
ratio
yield
(%)
MW
Tg
Td
polymer
PDHF
(x/y)a
(×104) PDI (°C) (°C)b
100/0 100/0
PSiloBg1 99/1
PSiloBg3 97/3
62
78
96
8.2
7.5
18.5
2.3
75c 421
2.2 106
2.4 110
98.7/1.3
96.9/3.1
425
427
a
Content ratios were calculated by NMR assignment of the
polymers, and x/y indicates the ratio of 2,7-dibromo-9,9′-dihexy-
lfluorene to the siloxane-bridged fluorene.21 b Temperature result-
ing in a 5% weight loss based on the initial weight. c From ref 12b.
C
26H32Br2O2: C, 58.22; H, 6.01. Found: C, 58.34; H, 6.17.
(2) P r ep a r a tion of 2-(2,7-Dibr om o-9-h exylflu or en -9-yl)-
eth a n -1-ol (3). To 16.21 g (30 mmol) of the THP-protected
fluorene compound, 2, in a single-necked 250-mL round-bottom
flask was added 100 mL of acidified ethanol (containing 5 mL
of a 10% HCl aqueous solution). The reaction mixture was then
refluxed for 30 min, after which it was cooled to room
temperature, and the ethanol was removed by rotoevaporation
in vacuo at 60 °C. The reaction solution was extracted with
chloroform and washed with a saturated aqueous sodium
bicarbonate solution and two 100 mL portions of water. The
combined chloroform solutions were then dried over anhydrous
magnesium sulfate and concentrated in vacuo. The crude
product was column chromatographed on silica gel using a
mixture of ethyl acetate and n-hexane (1/10) as the eluent,
yielding 10.34 g (87.6% yield) of the viscous oily product: 1H
NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.52 (br s, 2H), 0.75 (t, 3H), 1.00-1.10 (m,
6H), 1.92 (t, 2H), 2.27 (t, 2H), 2.96 (t, 2H), 7.42-7.51 (m, 6H);
13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 14.09, 22.61, 23.03, 29.49, 31.45, 40.43,
42.25, 53.76, 58.46, 121.38, 121.77, 126.33, 130.56, 138.71,
151.67. Anal. Calcd for C21H24Br2O: C, 55.77; H, 5.35. Found:
C, 55.91; H, 5.38.
(5) P r ep a r a t ion of 2,7-Dib r om o-9,9′-d ih exylflu or en e
(Mon om er -2). To a solution of 24.92 g (76.9 mmol) of 2,7-
dibromofluorene, 26.05 g (157.8 mmol) of 1-bromohexane, 50
mL of toluene, and 1.4 g of tetrabutylammonium bromide as
a phase-transfer catalyst was added 50 mL of a 50 wt % NaOH
aqueous solution. The reaction mixture was then refluxed at
100 °C for 10 h, after which it was cooled to ambient
temperature. The resulting solution was extracted with 200
mL of methylene chloride from 200 mL of saturated sodium
bicarbonate, washed with water, dried over anhydrous mag-
nesium sulfate, and then concentrated in vacuo. The crude
product was purified by recrystallization with n-hexane several
times, yielding 34.75 g (91.8% yield) of the solid product: 1H
NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.58 (br s, 4H), 0.74 (t, 6H), 1.02-1.12 (m,
12H), 1.90 (m, 4H), 7.42-7.51 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ
14.00, 22.58, 23.66, 29.59, 31.46, 40.21, 55.70, 121.13, 121.49,
126.20, 130.17, 139.08, 152.58. Anal. Calcd for C25H32Br2: C,
60.99; H, 6.55. Found: C, 61.05; H, 6.64.
(3) P r ep a r a tion of 1-[2-(2,7-Dibr om o-9-h exylflu or en -
9-yl)eth oxy]p r op -2-en e (4). The deprotected compound (3)
(9.05 g, 20 mmol), allyl bromide (12 g), and tetrabutylammo-
nium bromide (1.4 g) were dissolved in 30 mL of toluene over
the course of 10 min. To this solution was added 100 mL of a
50 wt % NaOH aqueous solution, and the reaction mixture
was stirred at 120-140 °C for 24 h. After being cooled to room
temperature, the resulting solution was extracted with chlo-
roform from brine and a saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate
solution, and finally distilled water. The organic layer was
dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate and concentrated in
vacuo to give an oily product. The crude product was purified
by column chromatography on silica gel using a mixture of
ethyl acetate and n-hexane (1/30) as the eluent, yielding 8.64
g (87.7% yield) of the oily product: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.63
(br s, 2H), 0.76 (t, 3H), 1.02-1.09 (m, 6H), 1.93 (m, 2H), 2.30
(t, 2H), 2.73 (t, 2H), 3.58 (d, 2H), 5.04 (m, 2H), 5.63 (m, 1H),
7.43-7.51 (m, 6H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 14.00, 22.58, 23.33,
29.47, 31.46, 39.30, 40.55, 53.71, 66.20, 71.63, 116.71, 121.23,
121.61, 126.39, 130.46, 134.44, 138.77, 151.68. Anal. Calcd for
All the copolymers were synthesized by the nickel(0)-
mediated polymerization method (commonly called the Yama-
moto coupling reaction).13
(6) P r ep a r a tion of P SiloBg-3. A mixture of 0.735 g of bis-
(1,5-cyclooctadienyl)nickel(0), 0.417 g of 2,2′-dipyridyl, 0.2 mL
of 1,5-cyclooctadiene, and 5 mL of anhydrous DMF was kept
at 80 °C for 30 min under an argon atmosphere. To this
solution was added dropwise a total of 1.8 mmol of monomers,
comprising a mixture of 2,7-dibromo-9,9′-dihexylfluorene (mono-
mer-2) and siloxane containing bridged fluorene (Monomer-1)
in a molar ratio of 97/3, dissolved in 15 mL of toluene. The
resulting solution was stirred at 80 °C for 3 days. Then, 0.1 g
of bromopentafluorobenzene (the end capper) in 5 mL of
anhydrous toluene was added to the polymer solution, and the
resulting solution was stirred at 80 °C for a further 24 h. The
polymer was precipitated in 400 mL of a mixture of HCl,
acetone, and methanol (1/1/2, v/v). The filtered crude polymer
was extracted with chloroform from an NaHCO3 aqueous
solution, washed with distilled water, and dried over anhy-
drous magnesium sulfate. The organic layer was concentrated
in vacuo, dissolved in chloroform, and precipitated in methanol
again. The resulting polymer was purified by Soxhlet extrac-
tion in methanol (80 °C, 3 days) and dried under vacuum.
Finally, the dried polymer was dissolved in chloroform,
precipitated in methanol, and dried in vacuo to give 0.617 g
(96% yield) of a slightly yellow polymer: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0
(m), 0.58 (m), 0.78 (t), 1.12 (m), 2.09 (m), 7.66-7.83 (m); FTIR
(KBr) 2954, 2927, 2856, 1458, 1402, 1377, 1250, 1107, 1033,
999, 885, 813, 758 cm-1. Anal. Calcd for PSiloBg-3: C, 89.44;
H, 9.67. Found: C, 87.67; H, 9.84.
C
24H28Br2O: C, 58.55; H, 5.73. Found: C, 58.46; H, 5.89.
(4) P r ep a r a tion of 1-[2-(2,7-Dibr om o-9-h exylflu or en -
9-yl)et h oxy]-3-{1-[1-(1-{1-[1-(1-{4-[2-(2,7-d ib r om o-9-h ex-
ylflu or en -9-yl)eth oxy]-1,1-dim eth yl-1-silabu toxy}-1-m eth -
yl-1-sila et h oxy)-1-m et h yl-1-sila et h oxy]-1-m et h yl-1-sila -
eth oxy}-1-m eth yl-1-sila eth oxy)-1-m eth yl-1-sila eth oxy]-1-
m eth yl-1-sila eth oxy}-3-m eth yl-3-sila bu ta n e (Mon om er -
1). A total of 0.87 g (2.0 mmol) of the vinylfluorene compound
(4) and 0.56 g (0.98 mmol) of hydride-terminated siloxane (MW
∼ 580) were dissolved in 30 mL of toluene, and 0.2 g of Pt on
activated carbon was dispersed in the solution. The resulting
solution was stirred at 60 °C for 24 h and then filtered through
a medium-size glass filter packed with Celite-545. After the
mixture had been filtered, the toluene was evaporated in vacuo
and the concentrated crude product was purified by column
chromatography using a mixture of ethyl acetate and n-hexane
(1/30) as the eluent, yielding 1.21 g (86.25% yield) of the oily
product: 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ -0.10 to 0.16 (m, 48H), 0.35 (m,
4H), 0.60 (b, 4H), 0.76 (t, 6H), 0.93-1.19 (m, 12H), 1.35 (m,
4H), 1.93 (m, 4H), 2.28 (t, 4H), 2.73 (t, 4H), 2.98 (t, 4H), 7.37-
7.56 (m, 12H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.11, 1.1, 1.2, 14.0, 14.1,
22.6, 23.3, 23.4, 29.5, 31.4, 39.4, 40.5, 53.8, 66.5, 73.6, 121.2,
121.6, 126.4, 130.4, 138.8, 151.8. Anal. Calcd for C63H104Br4O9-
Si8: C, 48.82; H, 6.76. Found: C, 48.27; H, 6.49.
(7) P r ep a r a tion of P SiloBg-1 a n d P oly(d ih exylflu o-
r en e) (P DHF ). The polymerization and purification proce-
dures for PSiloBg-1 and PDHF were the same as those used
for PSiloBg-3; the polymerization yields are listed in Table 1.
1
The H NMR and FTIR spectra of PSiloBg-1 and PDHF were
similar to those of PSiloBg-3. Anal. Calcd for PSiloBg-1: C,
90.01; H, 9.69. Found: C, 89.47; H, 9.83. Anal. Calcd for
PDHF: C, 90.30; H, 9.70. Found: C, 90.42; H, 9.96.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
Syn th esis a n d Ch a r a cter iza tion . We first synthe-
sized 2-[2-(2,7-dibromo-9-hexylfluoren-9-yl)ethoxy]per-
hydro-2H-pyran (2) having different substituents at the