superior to Et3N (entry 3). Changing the base to pyridine,
2,6-lutidine, or i-Pr2NH inhibited the reaction, and no
conversion to the silyl ether was observed (entries 4-6).
Interestingly, when KH2PO4 was used, silylation proceeded
to 32% conversion with predominant in situ conversion to
the silanol before the reaction stalled (entry 7).
the pH 5-7 range, with increased amounts of 9d formed
either above or below this pH range (entries 1-7). The
phosphate buffers gave disappointingly slow hydrolysis
except at pH > 9, where the ratio of 8:9 is unacceptably
high (entries 8-12). These trends become clear when
conversions are plotted against reaction pH (Figure 1). The
results are in agreement with earlier studies that show that
mildly acidic conditions (near pH 4) maximize hydrolysis
of the silyl ether and minimize dimerization.13 The simplest
buffer system that falls into the ideal pH 5-7 range is a 1.0
M acetic acid/ammonium acetate buffer at pH 5.6. Using
this protocol, the hydrolysis of the silyl ether is complete
within 2 h and the amount of 9d formed is kept below 1%.
With optimized conditions in hand for the synthesis of
the silyl ether, its hydrolysis to the silanol was investigated
next. A well-known complication in the hydrolysis of silyl
ethers (under either acidic or basic conditions) to the silanols
8 is the competitive dimerization of 8 to the disiloxanes 9.11
Although the pH dependence of hydrolysis of alkyltrieth-
oxysilyl ethers12a and the dimerization of alkylsilanols12b have
been studied, no reports describe the relative amounts of 8
and 9 formed during the hydrolysis of silyl ethers. Thus, a
study on the effect of pH on the hydrolysis and dimerization
was undertaken. The optimization of the hydrolysis was
performed with unpurified silylation product mixtures with
the consequence that the reaction medium is intrinsically
basic because of the residual i-Pr2EtN from the silylation
reaction. Addition of either acidic or basic buffers to this
mixture resulted in a variety of in situ-formed ammonium
buffers of different pH. To create a homogeneous solution,
acetonitrile was added along with either an acetate or
phosphate buffer. GC analysis allowed for monitoring the
conversion of 3d to both 8d and 9d. Analysis of the reactions
with acetate buffers showed that the conversion to 8d is high
when the pH is held below 7 (Table 5, entries 1-6).
Increasing the pH above 7 resulted in a slower hydrolysis
reaction (entry 7). The ratio of 8d:9d appears to be ideal in
Figure 1. pH Dependence of formation of 8d and 9d.
Table 5. pH Dependence on the Hydrolysis and Dimerization
of 3d
A variety of aryl bromides were then subjected to the one-
pot silylation/hydrolysis procedure (Table 6). Good yields
were obtained with a range of substrates within a reasonable
reaction time. Increasing the amount of disilane 5 from 1.1
to 1.5 equiv effected a substantial increase in yield for a
number of substrates (entries 1-3 and 6-7), although not
for 8d (entry 4). The excess of 5 appears to increase the
rate of the silylation compared to reduction or homocoupling.
In the purification of the crude silanol products, a portion
of the palladium leached through the silica gel column,
affording colored products. Several palladium scavengers
were screened and evaluated by visual inspection of the
products and ease of removal. It was found that 2-(dimethyl-
amimo)ethanethiol hydrochloride was the simplest and most
cost-effective palladium scavenger.14 This solid is added
directly to the hydrolysis reaction mixture and is removed
with the palladium in the aqueous extraction.
concn,
M
pH of pH of 8d , ratio of
a
entry
buffer
buffer reaction
%
8d :9d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10.0 HOAc
2.0 HOAc
1.0 HOAc
1.07
2.02
2.23
2.89
3.79
4.92
5.98
4.20
5.16
5.63
6.17
6.31
6.97
8.98
6.98
7.25
8.62
9.06
9.00
75 97.1:2.9
83 99.2:0.8
77 98.9:1.1
80 99.4:0.6
82 98.8:1.2
80 99.2:0.8
62 86.5:13.5
25 98.7:1.3
17 98.0:2.0
18 95.4:4.6
63 85.5:14.5
63 83.1:16.9
1.0 HOAc/NaOAc
1.0 HOAc/NaOAc
1.0 HOAc/NaOAc
1.0 HOAc/NaOAc
1.0 KH2PO4/K2HPO4 4.46
1.0 KH2PO4/K2HPO 5.44
1.0 KH2PO4/K2HPO4 6.70
1.0 KH2PO4/K2HPO4 7.96
1.0 KH2PO4/K2HPO4 8.72
(11) (a) Akerman, E. Acta Chem. Scand. 1956, 10, 298. (b) Rutz, W.;
Lange, D.; Popowski, E.; Kelling, H. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1986, 536,
197. (c) Shirai, N.; Moriya, K.; Kawazoe, Y. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 2211.
(12) Pohl, E. R.; Osterholtz, F. D. Polym. Sci. Technol. 1985, 27, 157.
(b) Pohl, E. R.; Osterholtz, F. D. In Silanes, Surfaces and Interfaces; Leyden,
D. E., Ed.; Gordon and Breach: New York, 1986; Vol. 1, pp 481-500.
(13) Osterholtz, F. D.; Pohl, E. R. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 1992, 6, 127.
(14) Both trisodium thiocyanuracic acid (see: Rosso, V. W.; Lust, D.
A.; Bernot, P. J.; Grosso, J. A.; Modi, S. P.; Rusowicz, A.; Sedergran, T.
C.; Simpson, J. H.; Srivastava, S. K.; Humora, M. J.; Anderson, N. G. Org.
Process Res. DeV. 1997, 1, 311) and mercapto-functionalized silica gel
(Silicycle, Quebec City) were also investigated with lesser success.
10
11
12
a Determined by GC analysis vs internal standard.
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 19, 2003
3485