C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Heterogeneous Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Aromatic
Table 2. Recycling and Reuse of Zr-Ru-L1 Solid Catalyst for
Ketonesa
Hydrogenation of 1-Acetonaphthonea
run
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
ee (%)
99.0 99.0 99.1 99.0 99.0 99.2 99.1 99.0
85
conversion (%) 100 100 100 100 100 100 95
solid
loading KOBu
(%)
a The reactions were carried out with 0.1 mol % solid loading and 1%
KOtBu under 700 psi H2 pressure for 20 h.
t
Zr−Ru−L1
ee (%)
Zr−Ru−L2
ee (%)
substrate
(%)
Ar ) Ph, R ) Me
0.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
96.3 (97.1)b 79.0 (81.3)b
current plasma spectroscopic studies indicated that less than 0.2%
of Ru metal has leached into the organic product for each round of
hydrogenation. We have also reused the Zr-Ru-L2 system for
hydrogenation of 1-acetonaphthone three times with complete
conversions and enantioselectivity of 96.3, 95.7, and 94.7%,
respectively.
In summary, we have designed and synthesized novel chiral
porous Zr phosphonates containing Ru-BINAP-DPEN moieties.
The Zr-Ru-L1 solid catalyzes heterogeneous asymmetric hydro-
genation of aromatic ketones with practically useful, remarkably
high activity and enantioselectivity (up to 99.2% ee). These solid
catalysts can be readily recycled and reused without the loss of
activity and enantioselectivity. The tunability of such a molecular
building-block approach promises to lead to other practically useful
heterogeneous asymmetric catalysts.
Ar ) 2-naphthyl, R ) Me 0.1
97.1
99.2
96.0
94.9
97.0
93.1
90.6
99.2
98.9
82.1
91.5
79.9
59.3
79.5
83.9
-
Ar ) 4′-tBu-Ph, R ) Me
Ar ) 4′-MeO-Ph, R ) Me 0.1
Ar ) 4′-Cl-Ph, R ) Me
Ar ) 4′-Me-Ph, R ) Me
Ar ) Ph, R ) Et
Ar ) Ph, R ) cyclo-Pr
Ar ) 1-naphthyl, R ) Me 0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
1
0.4
95.8
0.02
0.005 0.02 98.8 (70)c
0.005 0.02 98.6d
a All of the reactions were carried out in 20 h, and the ee values were
determined by GC on a Supelco â-Dex 120 column. The absolute
configurations of the products are identical to those obtained by the Ru-
(R)-BINAP-(R,R)-DPEN catalyst. All the conversions were >99% as
judged by the integrations of GC peaks. b Homogeneous reactions. c 70%
conversion. d 40 h reaction time.
Acknowledgment. We thank NSF (CHE-0208930) for financial
support. W.L. is an A. P. Sloan Fellow, a Beckman Young
Investigator, a Cottrell Scholar of Research Corp, and a Camille
Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar.
conversion and 96.3% ee in 2-propanol with 0.1 mol % loading of
Zr-Ru-L1 solid. This level of enantioselectivity is significantly
higher than that observed for the parent Ru-BINAP-DPEN
homogeneous catalyst which typically gives ∼80% ee for the
hydrogenation of acetophenone under similar conditions.6a-b In
comparison, the Zr-Ru-L2 solid gives 79.0% ee for the hydro-
genation of acetophenone under the same conditions. As Table 1
shows, the Zr-Ru-L1 solid has also been used to catalyze a series
of other aromatic ketones with uniformly and remarkably high ee’s
of 90.6-99.2% and complete conversions. Although the Zr-Ru-
L2 solid is also highly active for the hydrogenation of aromatic
ketones, the enantioselectivity of Zr-Ru-L2 is modest and similar
to that of parent Ru-BINAP-DPEN homogeneous catalyst.7
Aromatic ketones can also be hydrogenated with much lower
catalyst loading. For example, with only 0.02 mol % solid loading
of Zr-Ru-L1, 1-acetonaphthone can be hydrogenated with com-
plete conversion and 98.9% ee in 20 h. When the solid loading
was decreased to 0.005 mol %, it took longer reaction time (40 h)
for the hydrogenation of 1-acetonaphthone to complete (98.6% ee).
The TOF is calculated to be ∼500 h-1 at complete conversion and
∼700 h-1 at 70% conversion.8
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
10 figures (PDF). This material is available free of charge via the
References
(1) (a) Knowles, W. S. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 3. (b) Noyori, R. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2008. (c) Zhou, Y. G.; Tang, W.; Wang, W. B.;
Li, W.; Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4952. (d) Ireland, T.;
Tappe, K.; Grossheimann, G.; Knochel, P. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 843.
(2) (a) Noyori, R. Takaya, H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 345. (b) Matsumoto,
T.; Murayama, T.; Mitsuhashi, S.; Miura, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
5043
(3) (a) Song, C. E.; Lee, S. G. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3495. (b) Fan, Q. H.;
Li, Y. M.; Chan, A. S. C. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 3385. (c) Sinou, D.
AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 221. (d) Saluzzo, C.; Lemaire, M. AdV.
Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 915. (e) Pu, L. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 2405.
(4) Evans, O. R.; Lin, W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 511-522.
(5) (a) Clearfield, A. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1998, 47, 371. (b) Alberti, G.;
Costantino, U.; Marmottini, F.; Vivani, R.; Zappelli, P. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1357.
(6) (a) Ohkuma, T.; Ooka, H.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 10417. (b) Doucet, H.; Ohkuma, T.; Murata, K.; Yokozawa,
T.; Kozawa, M.; Katayama, E.; England, A. F.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1703. (c) Ohkuma, T.; Ishii, D.; Takeno,
H.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6510. (d) Ohkuma, T.;
Koizumi, M.; Doucet, H.; Pham, T.; Kozawa, M.; Murata, K.; Katayama,
E.; Yokozawa, T.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
13529. (e) Ohkuma, T.; Koizumi, M.; Mun˜iz, K.; Hilt, G.; Kabuto, C.;
Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6508.
We have also successfully reused both the Zr-Ru-L1 and Zr-
Ru-L2 systems for asymmetric hydrogenation of 1-acetonaphthone
without the deterioration of enantioselectivity. As shown in Table
2, the Zr-Ru-L1 system was used for eight cycles of hydrogena-
tion without any loss of enantioselectivity. The activity did not
decrease for the first six runs, but began to drop at the seventh
run. This loss of activity may not reflect the intrinsic instability of
the Zr-Ru-L1 solid catalyst. The catalyst recycling and reuse
experiments were conducted without rigorous exclusion of air, and
the oxygen sensitivity of the ruthenium hydride complexes may
have contributed to the loss of activity after multiple runs. Direct
(7) We believe that very different ee values observed for the Zr-Ru-L1 and
Zr-Ru-L2 systems are a result of the substituent effects on BINAP. The
ee values similar to those listed in Table 1 have been observed for
homogeneous Ru-L1-DPEN and Ru-L2-DPEN systems.
(8) Under identical conditions, we have obtained a TOF of 1725 h-1 (69%
conversion) and 1250 h-1 (complete conversion) for the homogeneous
Ru-(R)-BINAP-(R,R)-DPEN catalyst.
JA0348344
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 38, 2003 11491