G. Maier, J. Endres
FULL PAPER
Table 2. Comparison of the calculated infrared spectrum for the
carbon dioxide complex ([D2]-1·CO2) with the experimental (argon,
10 K) infrared spectrum after irradiation of deuterated imidazole-
2-carboxylic acid ([D2]-3) with λ ϭ 254 nm; the five vibrations be-
low 400 cmϪ1 are not listed; vibrations due to carbon dioxide are
marked with an asterisk
Sources: Excimer laser LPX 105 MC from Lambda Physics, mer-
cury high-pressure lamp HBO 200 from Osram, and mercury low-
pressure spiral lamp from Gräntzel. Ϫ Imidazole-2-carboxylic Acid
(3) was prepared according to the literature (see ref.[10]). Ϫ [D2]-
Imidazole-2-carboxylic Acid ([D2]-3) was prepared by recrystalliza-
tion of imidazole-2-carboxylic acid (3) in D2O.
˜
˜
No. Sym.
νexp [cmϪ1] (Iexp) νcalcd [cmϪ1] (Icalcd
)
Ƞ
Dedicated to Professor Gernot Boche on the occasion of his
ν1
ν2
AЈ
AЈ
AЈ
AЈ
AЈ
AЈ
AЈ
AЈ
AЈ
AЈ
AЈ
νCH
νCH
Ϫ
Ϫ
3281.8 (0.02)
3260.4 (0.00)
2694.6 (0.28)
2679.6 (0.82)
2421.2* (7.24)
1585.8 (0.00)
1380.4 (0.01)
1365.8* (0.06)
1341.5 (0.20)
1272.4 (0.02)
1145.9 (0.01)
1114.6 (0.09)
1089.3 (0.07)
946.5 (0.08)
929.3 (0.02)
893.0 (0.23)
865.2 (0.45)
823.3 (0.00)
714.8 (1.00)[a]
668.2* (0.37)
626.6 (0.00)
623.2 (0.00)
610.9* (1.85)
532.9 (0.28)
494.9 (0.66)
60th birthday.
[1]
A. J. Arduengo III, R. L. Harlow, M. Kline J. Am. Chem. Soc.
ν3
νND
Ϫ
2616.6 (1.61)
2332.1* (11.31)
Ϫ
1991, 113, 361Ϫ363.
[2]
ν4
νND
For a recent review see: W. A. Herrmann, C. Köcher Angew.
ν5
νas, CO
Chem. 1997, 109, 2257Ϫ2282; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
1997, 36, 2162Ϫ2187.
ν6
νCϭC
[3]
ν7
δCH (i.p.)
νs, CO
Ϫ
Ϫ
C. Heinemann, W. Thiel. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 217, 11Ϫ16.
ν8
Ϫ C. Heinemann, T. Müller, Y. Apeloig, H. Schwarz J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2023Ϫ2036. Ϫ C. Boehme, G. Frenking
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2037Ϫ2046.
ν9
δNCN
νCN
1316.7 (0.44)
ν10
ν11
ν12
ν13
ν14
ν15
ν16
ν17
ν22
ν23
ν24
ν25
ν26
ν18
ν27
ν28
Ϫ
Ϫ
[4]
δs, CH (i.p.)
G. A. McGibbon, C. Heinemann, D. J. Lavorato, H. Schwarz
AЈ δas, CH (i.p.)
1088.0 (0.09)
1073.2 (0.06)
934.0 (0.14)
Ϫ
871.0 (0.41)
844.5 (0.74)
Ϫ
709.2 (1.00)
666.1* (0.58)
Ϫ
Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 1572Ϫ1575; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl. 1997, 36, 1478Ϫ1481.
AЈ
AЈ
AЈ
δCH
δCNC
δring
[5]
All calculations were carried out by using the program package
Gaussian 94 (Revision D.3)[6] and the hybrid HF/DFT method
B3LYP with a standard 6-311G(d,p) basis set. Zero point vi-
brational energies are included in the calculated energies.
AЈ δas, ND (i.p.)
AЈ δs, ND (i.p.)
[6]
AЈЈ δas, CH (o.o.p.)
AЈЈ δs, CH (o.o.p.)
AЈЈ δOCO (o.o.p.)
AЈЈ δring (o.o.p.)
AЈЈ δring (o.o.p.)
M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G.
Johnson, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, T. Keith, G. A. Peters-
son, J. A. Montgomery, K. Raghavachari, M. A. Al-Laham, V.
G. Zakrzewski, J. V. Ortiz, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, B. B.
Stefanov, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, C. Y. Peng, P. Y.
Ayala, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, E. S. Replogle, R.
Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, J. S. Binkley, D. J. Defrees,
J. Baker, J. P. Stewart, M. Head-Gordon, C. Gonzalez, J. A.
Pople, Gaussian 94, Revision D.3, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh
PA, 1995.
Ϫ
AЈ
δOCO (i.p.)
623.7* (1.11)
510.3 (0.43)
485.8 (1.24)
A” δND (o.o.p.)
A” δND (o.o.p.)
[a]
Calculated absolute intensity: 76.9 kmиmolϪ1
.
[7]
Graham A. McGibbon, Jan Hrusak, David J. Lavarto, Helmut
Schwarz, Johan K. Terlouw, Chem. Eur. J. 1997, 3, 232Ϫ236
[8]
G. Maier, J. Endres, H. P. Reisenauer Angew. Chem. 1997, 109,
1788Ϫ1790; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1709Ϫ1712.
[9]
Experimental Section
Cryostat for Matrix Isolation: Displex closed-cycle refrigeration
system CSA 202 from Air Products. Ϫ Spectrometers: IR: FT-IR
spectrometer IFS 55 from Bruker, resolution 0.5 cmϪ1 Ϫ Light
G. Maier, C. Schmidt, H. P. Reisenauer, E. Endlein, D. Becker,
J. Eckwert, B. A. Hess, L. J. Schaad Chem. Ber. 1993, 126,
2337Ϫ2352.
[10]
N. J. Curtis, R. S. Brown J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 4038Ϫ4040.
[98082]
1520
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 1517Ϫ1520