RSC Advances
Communication
Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditionsa
Table 2 The scope of b-dicarbonyl compoundsa
Yieldb (%)
Entry
Catalyst
Oxidant
Solvent
T (ꢀC)
Yieldb (%)
Entry
b-Dicarbonyl compound
Product
1
2
3
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
—
I2
KI
Bu4NI
KIO3
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
I2
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
—
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
H2O2
Oxone
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
TBHP
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
THF
25
45
65
Reux
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
27
73
94
94
89
0
21
85
66
0
49
17
87
85
38
Trace
1
2
3
4
5
6
R1 ¼ C6H5, R2 ¼ OEt, R3 ¼ H
R1 ¼ 4-BrC6H4, R2 ¼ OEt, R3 ¼ H
R1 ¼ 2-MeC6H4, R2 ¼ OEt, R3 ¼ H
R1 ¼ 4-MeOC6H4, R2 ¼ OEt, R3 ¼ H
R1 ¼ 2-naphthyl, R2 ¼ OEt, R3 ¼ H
R1 ¼ 2-furyl, R2 ¼ OEt, R3 ¼ H
R1 ¼ 2-thienyl, R2 ¼ OEt, R3 ¼ H
R1 ¼ C6H5, R2 ¼ OEt, R3 ¼ Me
R1 ¼ iPr, R2 ¼ OEt, R3 ¼ H
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
3h
3i
3j
3k
3l
3m
3n
94
87
71
87
93
71
82
9
66
51
66
54
48
81
4
5c
6
7d
8
7
8c
9
9
10
11
12
13
14d
R1 ¼ tBu, R2 ¼ OEt, R3 ¼ H
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
R1 ¼ CO2Me, R2 ¼ CO2Me, R3 ¼ H
R1 ¼ CO2Et, R2 ¼ CO2Et, R3 ¼ H
t
t
R1 ¼ CO2 Bu, R2 ¼ CO2 Bu, R3 ¼ H
R1 ¼ C6H5, R2 ¼ C6H5, R3 ¼ H
EtOAc
CHCl3
CH3COOH
a
Reaction conditions: 0.5 mmol of 1, 0.6 mmol of 2a, 0.05 mmol of I2,
0.75 mmol of TBHP (70% in water), in 2 mL of MeCN at 65 ꢀC, for 1–4 h.
a
Isolated yield. c Conversion: 38%. d Solvent: THF (2 mL).
b
Reaction conditions: 0.5 mmol of 1a, 0.6 mmol of 2a, 0.05 mmol of
b
catalyst, 0.75 mmol of oxidant, in 2 mL of solvent for 1 h. Isolated
yield. The reaction was run under N2. The reaction was run with
1.0 equiv. of iodine.
c
d
donating or electron-withdrawing group on the phenyl ring gave
the corresponding products in good to high yields (3b–d). Other
aromatic rings such as naphthyl, furyl, and thienyl groups could
also be tolerated, and delivered the corresponding products 3e–
g in good to excellent yields. It was noteworthy that the location
of a methyl group at the a-position of b-keto esters impeded the
reaction process, and the desired product 3h was only furnished
in 9% yield. Furthermore, the aliphatic b-keto esters were also
attempted and gave the corresponding products in moderate
yields (3i, 3j). As for the different b-diesters, the reaction also
proceeded well, and gave the desired products 3k, 3l and 3m in
moderate yields. The b-diketone such as dibenzoylmethane was
proved to be a good substrate for this transformation, and the
product 3n was obtained in 81% yield.
The different sodium sulnates were also evaluated for this
transformation (Table 3). Arylsulnic acid sodium salts bearing
electro-donating or electro-withdrawing substituents on the
phenyl ring could smoothly react with ethyl benzoylacetate to
give the corresponding products in high yields (3o, 3p).
Furthermore, the aliphatic sulnic acid sodium salts like
sodium methanesulnate were also suitable for this reaction,
and coupled with b-keto esters or b-diketones in moderate
yields (3q, 3r). Besides, the reactions of b-diketones with
different kinds of aromatic sulnic acid sodium salts also pro-
ceeded smoothly, and provided the b-diketo sulfones in high to
excellent yields (3s–u).
could be increased when the reaction temperature was raised
(entries 1–3), and the best result (94% yield of 3a) was obtained
when heating the reaction mixture to 65 ꢀC (entry 3), while a
higher temperature could not give a better result (entry 4). 3a
was obtained in slightly lower yields when the reaction was run
under N2 atmosphere (entry 5). Control experiments indicated
that the desired product 3a could not be determined in the
absence of iodine catalyst (entry 6), and only 21% yield of 3a was
obtained even using stoichiometric amount of iodine in the
absence of TBHP (entry 7). Other catalysts such as KI, Bu4NI,
and KIO3 were examined but found less effective than iodine:
for KI and Bu4NI, 3a was just afforded in 85% and 66% yields
separately (entries 8 and 9); while no desired product was
detected when using potassium iodate as the catalyst (entry 10).
Two commonly used oxidants (H2O2 and Oxone) were also
tested for this transformation, while 3a was produced in inferior
yields (entries 11 and 12). Other different solvents were also
attempted for this transformation but they failed to provide a
more favorable outcome (entries 13–16). For example, 3a could
be produced in high yield in the solvents like THF and EtOAc
(entries 13 and 14), while low yields of 3a were obtained when
using CHCl3 or AcOH as the solvent (entries 15 and 16).
With the optimal reaction conditions in hand (Table 1, entry
3), a series of b-dicarbonyl compounds (1) was then investigated
to couple with sodium benzenesulnate (2a). It was found that
various b-dicarbonyl compounds including b-keto esters,
b-diesters and b-diketones were suitable for this transformation
(Table 2). Ethyl benzoylacetate derivatives bearing electro-
The mechanism of the present transformation is worth dis-
cussing. Several control experiments were carried out in order to
obtain some insight of the possible mechanism. In the reaction
of ethyl benzoylacetate with sodium benzenesulnate, the a-
iodinated ester 4a was detected at the rst few minutes. 4a
49330 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 49329–49332
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014