1,2-diol as isopropylidene acetal. In fact, in the absence of
2,2-DMP a complex mixture of products was formed. TPAP-
promoted oxidation then led to the desired aldehyde (Scheme
3).12
Scheme 4a
Scheme 3a
a DIAD ) diisopropylazodicarboxylate. PT(SH) ) phenyltetra-
zole (thiol). TPAP ) tetra-n-propylammonium perruthenate. NMO
) N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide. LDA ) lithiumdiisopropylamide.
The termini of fragment 9 were sequentially elongated with
building blocks B and C, the latter being added prior to
aldehyde B by means of the Julia-Kocienski olefination.11
Sulfone 12 was prepared from (R)-methyl hydroxyisobutyrate
10, which was transformed into the phenyltetrazol thioether
under Mitsunobu conditions13 followed by reduction to yield
alcohol 11 (Scheme 3). Oxidation of the alcohol, subsequent
Wittig olefination, and finally oxidation of the thioether
yielded sulfone 12. This was coupled with the aldehyde
derived from alcohol 9 under slightly modified conditions
to the ones described before14 (lithiumdiisopropylamide in
tetrahydrofuran and warming to room temperature), which
furnished the desired (E)-olefin 13 in excellent 92% yield
(dr ) 9:1).
After three functional group manipulations (deprotection,
silylation, and oxidation), ketone 14 was obtained, which
set the stage for the key aldol reaction with aldehyde B
(Scheme 4).15 KHMDS proved to be the best choice for the
deprotonation of ketone 14 and the following aldol reaction
with aldehyde B. Remarkably, the adduct 15 was isolated
as a single diastereomer in excellent 98% yield.16 The
stereochemical outcome of the reaction could only be
a TBSCl ) tert-butyl-dimethylsilyl chloride. KHMDS ) potas-
sium hexamethyldisilazide.
elucidated after 1,3-syn-reduction to the corresponding diol,17
which then was protected as cyclic acetal 16. After desily-
lation, ring-closing olefin metathesis using the 2nd generation
Grubbs catalyst preferentially yielded the macrocyclic Z-
configured diene 17. The rigidity of the macrocycle as well
as the dioxolane ring allowed proof of the desired relative
7,8-anti-8,9-syn stereochemical relationship created during
the aldol reaction to 15 by means of observed NOE
correlations and H-H coupling constants and by analyzing
the 13C shifts with the Evans-Rychnovsky method.18,19
The synthesis was finalized starting from diol 16, which
had been obtained after 1,3-syn reduction of 15 (see Scheme
4). In fact, we had to return to this point of the synthesis, as
it is known that cis-disubstituted olefins such as 17 are
difficult to asymmetrically dihydroxylate.20 And indeed,
macrocycle 17 could not be oxidized, neither with OsO4 nor
under the Sharpless conditions.
(11) Blakemore, P. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 2563-2585
and references therein.
(12) Ley, S. V.; Norman, J.; Griffith, W. P.; Marsden, S. P. Synthesis
1994, 639-666.
(17) Reaction did not always proceed to completion. In these cases,
recovered starting material can be resubjected to enhance material through-
put.
(18) Observed coupling constants along the C-7-C-10 chain: δ ) 1.91-
2.06 (m, 2 H; H-7, 9-OH), 3.28 (br s, 1 H, H-10), 3.69 (d, J7,8 ) 6.1 Hz,
1 H; 8-H), 3.92 (d, J9,OH ) 11.3 Hz, 1 H, H-9); no H-H coupling constants
between C-8/C-9 and C-9/C-10 are observed, which supports the suggested
conformation depicted in Scheme 4.
(19) Determination of the 8,10-syn-relationship: (a) Evans, D. A.; Rieger,
D. L.; Gage, J. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 7099-7100. (b) Rychnovsky,
S. D.; Rogers, B.; Yang, G. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 3511-3515.
(20) Kolb, H. C.; VanNieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. ReV.
1994, 94, 2483-2547.
(13) (a) Mitsunobu, O. Synthesis 1981, 1-28. (b) Hughes, D. L.; Reamer,
R. A.; Bergan, J. J.; Grabowski, E. J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110,
6487-6491.
(14) Blakemore, P. R.; Cole, W. J.; Kocienski, P. J.; Morley, A. Synlett
1998, 26-28.
(15) (a) Mengel, A.; Reiser, O. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 1191-1223. (b)
Marco, J. A.; Carda, M.; D´ıaz-Oltra, S.; Murga, J.; Falomir, E.; Roeper, H.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8577-8582. (c) Evans, D. A.; Siska, S. J.; Cee,
V. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1761-1765.
(16) Detailed mechanistic discussion on this aldol reaction will be
presented in a full account.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 3, 2005
481