(Gabriel-Cromwell) process using only a slight excess of
primary amine and Cs2CO3 as a base at 95 °C.9
Scheme 2a
R-Iodocycloenone 4 was employed as the substrate for
aziridination, and we postulated that the presence of an
adjacent asymmetric center on a cyclohexane nucleus should
induce stereoselectivity to the process.9 The aziridination
reaction with 4-methoxybenzylamine afforded, however, two
diastereoisomers 5 and 6 in a 4:1 ratio (84% yield, Scheme
1), accompanied by an aromatic byproduct 7. The configu-
Scheme 1a
a Reaction conditions: (a) NaOH 0.5 N, THF, 0 °C, 88%. (b)
TBDMSCl, DMAP, (i-Pr)2NEt, CH2Cl2, rt, 80%. (c) H2O2, Triton
B, THF 0 °C, 90%. (d) HBr, MeOH, rt, 80%. (e) HF 40%, MeCN,
rt, 89%.
a Reaction conditions: (a) I2, DMAP, Pyr/CC4I, rt, 80%. (b)
4-Methoxybenzylamine, Cs2CO3, 1,10-phenanthroline, xylene, 95
°C, 84%.
more, care was needed to avoid aromatization and the degree
of purity of the aziridine was very important for the
successful outcome of this reaction. To induce the formation
of the epoxide with the correct stereochemistry, the free
hydroxyl group in 8, which in previous syntheses8 had been
shown to have a strong influence in directing the cis epoxide
formation, was protected with TBDMSCl, a bulky group, to
afford 9. Epoxidation of the enone system of 9 with hydrogen
peroxide and catalytic Triton B afforded exclusively the
epoxide 10 (80%). Surprisingly the epoxidation of 8, and
silylation of the resulting epoxide, afforded the same
compound 10. It was thus concluded that in this case, it was
not the hydroxyl group that exerted the strongest orientating
effect but the nitrogen atom of the aziridine group. This was
also confirmed by performing the same sequence of reactions
on the minor diastereoisomer 6; in this case, the epoxide
formed was syn with respect to the adjacent bulky TBDMS
ether group.
ration of aziridine 5 was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic
studies. We also attempted this reaction with other amines,
Figure 2.
with differing results. For benzylamine, only one diastereo-
isomer was obtained, with the aziridine below the plane of
the molecule (60%), along with an aromatic byproduct, which
contaminated the aziridine. When n-butylamine was used,
the two diastereoisomers of the aziridine were obtained in a
1:1 ratio (70%). As before, aromatic byproduct was also
formed.
Resuming the synthesis, at this stage, we had a molecule
with five asymmetric centers and two three-membered rings
on opposite sides of the cyclohexane ring, a highly strained
molecule.
The next step was critically important, since we were
dependent upon the exclusive opening of the benzylaziridine
in the presence of the epoxide. This proved to be rather easy
to accomplish employing 0.1 M HBr in MeOH at rt, and
TBDMS-protected bromoxone 11 was efficiently obtained
in 80% yield (Scheme 2), [R]20D +99.3 (c 1.03, CHCl3) (lit.
Treatment of aziridine 5 with catalytic NaOH 0.5 N
afforded the alcohol 8 (Scheme 2) in good yield (88%). Once
(6) Barros, M. T.; Maycock, C. D.; Ventura, M. R. J. Org. Chem. 1997,
62, 3984.
(7) Barros, M. T.; Maycock, C. D.; Ventura, M. R. Tetrahedron 1999,
55, 3233.
[R]20 +98.9 (c 0.79, CHCl3),5 mp 46-47 °C (lit. 49-50
D
°C).5
(8) Barros, M. T.; Maycock, C. D.; Ventura, M. R. Chem. Eur. J. 2000,
6, 3991.
(9) Barros, M. T.; Maycock, C. D.; Ventura, M. R. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 4329.
Hydrolysis of the silyl protecting group afforded (+)-
bromoxone 1 (89%), [R]20 +205.7 (c 0.32, acetone) (lit.
D
[R]20 +204.0 (c 0.21, acetone),5 [R]22 +220 (c 0.09,
D
D
4322
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 23, 2003