C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Catalytic Properties of Co(II)-Substituted LuxS Variants toward SRH and 2-Ketone Intermediate 1
SRH
2-ketone intermediate 1
LuxS varianta
k
cat (s-1
)
KM (µM)
kcat/KM (M-1 s-1
)
kcat (s-1
)
KM (µM)
kcat/KM (M-1 s-1
)
WT (Bs)
0.030 ( 0.005
0.48 ( 0.01
ND
1.4 ( 0.1
39 ( 1
ND
2.1 × 104
0.031 ( 0.004
0.48 ( 0.02
0.010 ( 0.001
0.007 ( 0.001
0.030 ( 0.001
1.5 ( 0.3
38 ( 1
29 ( 2
50 ( 4
58 ( 3
2.1 × 104
1.3 × 104
3.4 × 102
1.4 × 102
5.2 × 102
WT (Vh)
1.2 × 104
E57D (Vh)
C83D (Vh)
C83S (Vh)
148
5
18
ND
ND
ND
ND
a Bs, B. subtilis LuxS; Vh, V. harVeyi LuxS; WT, wild-type; ND, not determined.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 2-Keto Intermediate 1a
faster than its formation. Thus, the rate-limiting step is the shift of
the carbonyl group from C2 to C3 (1 to 2). The C84D mutation
slows down the formation of ketone 1 and causes the disappearance
of ketone 2. The C84A mutant is catalytically inactive and does
not form the 2-keto intermediate. These results suggest that Cys-
84 (Cys-83 in V. harVeyi LuxS) is involved in the early steps of
the reaction, likely responsible for the proton transfer at C1-C3
positions (Figure 2). Increased accumulation of the 3-keto inter-
mediate upon the E57A mutation suggests that Glu-57 plays a
critical role in its decay, presumably acting as the general base for
the final â-elimination reaction. Mutation of Glu-57 also slowed
the formation of the 2-keto intermediate (Table 1), as evidenced
by its peak intensity reaching maximum at ∼4 min for WT LuxS
(Figure 3a) but at 4-6 h for the E57A mutant (Figure 3c). We
propose that Glu-57 is also involved in the early steps of the
mechanism, by acting as a proton shuttle to facilitate the isomer-
ization of the enolate intermediates (Figure 2). Structural studies
show that both Glu-57 and Cys-84 are properly positioned in the
active site to perform the proposed functions.12
In summary, we have obtained direct evidence for the involve-
ment of 2- and 3-ketone intermediates in the LuxS-catalyzed
reaction, validating the catalytic mechanism previously proposed.
The keto intermediates are at least partially released from the
enzyme active site during catalysis, providing a rare example of
one active site catalyzing three distinct chemical reactions. The data
also suggest Cys-84 and Glu-57 as the possible general acids/bases
in the proposed catalytic mechanism.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) allyl alcohol, cat. H2SO4; (b) PMBCl,
Bu4NBr, 50% aq KOH/THF (1/1), 90 °C, 76% for 2 steps; (c) DIBAL, cat
NiCl2(dppp), THF; (d) NaBH4, EtOH, 73% for 2 steps; (e) SOCl2, TEA,
CH2Cl2, -78 °C; (f) NaIO4, cat. RuCl3, CCl4/CH3CN/H2O (4/4/6), 0 °C,
86% for 2 steps; (g) BocNH-CH(CH2CH2SH)CO2-t-Bu (5), BuLi, DMF,
0 °C; (h) H2SO4/H2O/THF, rt, 74% for 2 steps, 7:8 ) 4:1; (i) Dess-Martin,
CH2Cl2, rt, 76%; (j) TFA/anisole (5:1), rt, 93%.
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Charles Cottrell for assistance
in the NMR experiments. This work was supported by National
Institutes of Health (AI40575 and GM62820).
Scheme 2
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
additional NMR spectra (PDF). This material is available free of charge
References
(1) Miller, M. B.; Bassler, B. L. Annu. ReV. Microbiol. 2001, 55, 165-199.
(2) Bassler, B. L.; Wright, M.; Showalter, R. E.; Silverman, M. R. Mol.
Microbiol. 1993, 9, 773-786.
determined and compared with those of SRH (Table 1). Wild-type
LuxS from either B. subtilis or Vibrio harVeyi exhibited similar
activity toward the keto intermediate and SRH. This is consistent
with the notion that formation of intermediate 1 is a rapid step in
WT LuxS (vide infra). However, three catalytically compromised
V. harVeyi LuxS mutants (E57D, C83D, and C83S) all had much
higher activities (2-29-fold) toward the keto intermediate than SRH
(Table 1). For example, the C83D LuxS has a kcat value of 0.007
s-1 and a kcat/KM value of 140 M-1 s-1 toward the keto intermediate,
whereas its activity toward SRH was barely detectable by the DTNB
assay (kcat/KM ) 5 M-1 s-1). These results indicate that the 2-keto
intermediate is kinetically competent. They also suggest that
formation of the 2-keto intermediate is at least partially rate limiting
in the mutants.
(3) Miller, C. H.; Duerre, J. A. J. Biol. Chem. 1968, 243, 92-97.
(4) Surette, M. G.; Miller, M. B.; Bassler, B. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1999, 96, 1639-1644.
(5) Schauder, S.; Shokat, K.; Surette, M. G.; Bassler, B. L. Mol. Microbiol.
2001, 41, 463-476.
(6) Chen, X.; Schauder, S.; Potier, N.; Van Dorsselaer, A.; Pelczer, I.; Bassler,
B. L.; Hughson, F. M. Nature 2002, 415, 545-549.
(7) Zhu, J.; Dizin, E.; Hu, X.; Wavreille, A.; Park, J.; Pei, D. Biochemistry
2003, 42, 4717-4726.
(8) Taniguchi, T.; Ogasawara, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1136-
1137.
(9) Reduction by DIBAL gave alditol 3 plus a small amount of hemiacetal,
which was converted into 3 by reduction with NaBH4.
(10) Byun, H.-S.; He, L.; Bittman, R. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7051-7091.
(11) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155-4158.
(12) Lewis, H. A.; Furlong, E. B.; Laubert, B.; Eroshkina, G. A.; Batiyenko,
Y.; Adams, J. M.; Bergseid, M. G.; Marsh, C. D.; Peat, T. S.; Sanderson,
W. E.; Sauder, J. M.; Buchanan, S. G. Structure 2001, 9, 527-537. (b)
Hilgers, M. T.; Ludwig, M. L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98,
11169-11174. (c) Ruzheinikov, S. N.; Das, S. K.; Sedelnikova, S. E.;
Hartley, A.; Foster, S. J.; Horsburgh, M. J.; Cox, A. G.; McCleod, C. W.;
Mekhalfia, A.; Balckburn, G. M.; Rice, D. W.; Baker, P. J. J. Mol. Biol.
2001, 313, 111-122.
The above results provide additional insight into the LuxS
mechanism. Accumulation of intermediate 1 indicates that its
formation is fast relative to its decay. The lack of significant
accumulation of intermediate 2 for WT LuxS suggests that it decays
JA0369663
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 44, 2003 13381