Page 3 of 6
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Scheme 3. Plausible Reaction Mechanism
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
2
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
3
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
4
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
5
56
57
58
59
60
catalytic cycle with the aid of the Mn/Et4NI system as an efficient
reducing agent. Further studies on the reaction are now in
progress.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (“Organic synthesis
based on reaction integration” and “Molecular activation directed
toward straightforward synthesis”) from MEXT, Japan, and in
part by the Mitsubishi Foundation.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
characterization of the products. This material is available free of
References
(1) (a) Carbon Dioxide as Chemical Feedstock; Aresta, M., Ed.;
Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2010. (b) Sakakura, T.; Choi, J.-C.;
Yasuda, H. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2365–2387.
acid in high yield (Scheme 1). The vinyl chloride conjugated with
an aryl ring (4c) was also converted to the corresponding
carboxylic acid in moderate yield.
(2) (a) Huang, K.; Sun, C.-L.; Shi, Z.-J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40,
2435-2452. (b) Cokoja, M.; Bruckmeier, C.; Rieger, B.; Herrmann,
W. A.; Kühn, F. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8510–8537.
(c) Riduan, S. N.; Zang, Y. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 3347–3357.
(d) Aresta, M.; Dibenedetto, A. Dalton Trans. 2007, 2975–2992.
(e) Darensbourg, D. J. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2388–2410.
(3) (a) Fujihara, T.; Xu, T.; Semba, K.; Terao, J.; Tsuji, Y. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 523–527. (b) Li, S.; Yuan, W.; Ma, S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2578–2582. (c) Williams, C. M.;
Johnson, J. B.; Rovis, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14936–
14937. (d) Takaya, J.; Iwasawa, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
15254–15255. (e) Takaya, J.; Sasano, K.; Iwasawa, N. Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 1698–1701.
(4) (a) Yeung, C. S.; Dong, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 7826–
7827. (b) Ochiai, H.; Jang, M.; Hirano, K.; Yorimitsu, H.; Oshima,
K. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2681–2683.
(5) (a) Onishi, T.; Nishiura, M.; Hou, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 5792–5795. (b) Takaya, J.; Tadami, S.; Ukai, K.; Iwasawa, N.
Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2697–2700. (c) Ukai, K.; Aoki, M.; Takaya,
J.; Iwasawa, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8706–8707. (d)
Correa, A.; Martín, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6201–
6204.
To gain an insight into the catalytic mechanism, we carried
out stoichiometric reactions using NiPhCl(PPh3)2 (6), which was
prepared by the oxidative addition of chlorobenzene to
Ni(PPh3)4.14 In the presence of CO2 (1 atm), Mn powder, Et4NI,
and PPh3 (similar conditions to the catalytic reaction), 6 afforded
the carboxylated product (2p-Me) in 47% yield after
derivatization to the corresponding methyl ester (Scheme 2a).
However, upon the removal of either Mn powder or Et4NI from
the reaction systems, either a trace amount of 2p-Me or no
product was obtained (Scheme 2a). Thus, both Mn and Et4NI
were found to be indispensable for the carboxylation of 6.
Interestingly, a typical homogeneous reducing agent Co(5-
C5H5)2 (Eˊ = – 1.33 V vs. Fc/Fc+ in CH2Cl2)15 can replace the
Mn/Et4NI system to afford 2p-Me in the same yield (Scheme 2b).
Therefore, the Mn/Et4NI system may operate to reduce Ni(II) to
Ni(I). The electrochemical measurements showed that Ni(II)
complexes could be reduced to the corresponding Ni(I) species at
around –0.8 V (vs. SCE in DMF).7c Et4NI could assist the
electron transfer from Mn to the nickel catalyst center via the
bridging of the iodide ion.12b,16 On the other hand, it was reported
that Ni(PPh3)4 reacted with NiCl2(PPh3)2 to provide the Ni(I)
species.17 As shown in Scheme 2c, Ni(PPh3)4 could replace Mn to
afford 2p-Me in 34% yield. These results strongly indicate that
the Ni(I) species18 plays an important role in the present catalytic
carboxylation. Such Ni(I) species were also postulated in the
electrochemical carboxylation.7c
With these observations in Schemes 2, a possible catalytic
cycle for the nickel-catalyzed carboxylation of aryl chlorides with
CO2 is shown in Scheme 3. First, the Ni(II) complex must be
reduced to a Ni(0) species (A). Then, oxidative addition of the
aryl chloride (1) takes place to give a Ni(II) intermediate (B) (step
a). As suggested by the stoichiometric reaction in Scheme 2,
Ni(II) would be reduced by the Mn/Et4NI system to afford Ni(I)
intermediate (C) (step b). The generation of Ni(I) species was
observed in electrochemical reactions.7c Then, the nucleophilic
Ni(I) (C) reacts with CO2 to give the carboxylatonickel
intermediate (D) (step c). Finally, the reduction of D by Mn gives
the corresponding manganese carboxylate and the Ni(0) catalyst
species is regenerated (step d).
(6)
For carboxylation via direct aromatic C-H activation with a directing
moiety or acidic hydrogens, see: (a) Mizuno, H.; Takaya, J.; Iwasawa,
N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1251–1253. (b) Zang, L.; Cheng,
J.; Ohishi, T.; Hou, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8670–
8673. (c) Boogaerts, I. I. F.; Fortman, G. C.; Furst, M. R. L.; Cazin,
C. S. J.; Nolan, S. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8674–8677.
(d) Boogaerts, I. I. F.; Nolan, S. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
8858–8859.
(7) (a) Troupel, M.; Rollin, Y.; Perichon, J. New J. Chem. 1981, 5,
621–625. (b) Fauvarque, J.-F. ; Chevrot, C.; Jutand, A.; Francois,
M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, 264, 273–281. (c) Amatore, C.;
Jutand, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2819–2825. (d) Torii, S.;
Tanaka, H.; Hamatani, T.; Morisaki, K.; Jutand, A.; Pfluger, F.;
Fauvarque, J.-F. Chem. Lett. 1986, 169–172. (e) Amatore, C.;
Jutand, A.; Khalil, F.; Nielsen, M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
7076–7085.
(8) Osakada, K.; Sato, R.; Yamamoto, T. Organometallics 1994, 13,
4645–4647.
(9) Correa, A.; Martín, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 15974–15975.
(10) See the Supporting Information for details
(11) When entry 4 was carried out at 60 oC under otherwise identical
conditions, 3a was obtained in 58% yield.12
(12) (a) Zembayashi, M.; Tamao, K.; Yoshida, J.-i.; Kumada, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 47, 4089–4092. (b) Iyoda, M.; Otsuka, H.;
Sato, K.; Nisato, N.; Oda, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1990, 63, 80–
87.
(13) Aryl triflates and vinyl bromides did not afford carboxylated
products at all in the previous Pd-catalyzed carboxylation of aryl
bromides employing CO2.9
(14) (a) Zeller, A.; Herdtweck, E.; Strassner, T. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
2003, 1802–1806. (b) Hidai, M.; Kashiwagi, T.; Ikeuchi, T.;
Uchida, Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 1971, 30, 279–282.
(15) Connelly, N. G.; Geiger, W. E. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 877–910.
(16) Iyoda, M.; Sakaitani, M.; Otsuka, H.; Oda, M. Chem. Lett. 1985,
127–130.
In conclusion,
a
nickel-catalyzed highly efficient
carboxylation of aryl and vinyl chlorides employing CO2 has been
developed. The present reactions proceeded under a CO2 pressure
of 1 atm at room temperature. The Ni(I) species is involved in the
(17) Heimbach, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1964, 3, 648–649.
ACS Paragon Plus Environment