Crystallography
Single crystal X-ray di†raction data for 1 were collected on a
Bruker AXS SMART di†ractometer: C H O , T \ 223(2) K,
6
6 8
M \ 206.11, monoclinic, C2/c, a \ 11.216(1), b \ 9.612(1),
c \ 12.786(2) A, b \ 91.796(6)¡, V \ 1377.8(3) A 3, Z \ 8,
F(000) \ 848, k \ 0.193 mm~1, h range 2È34¡, 9624 reÑec-
tions, 2589 independent, reÐnement on F2 for 152 parameters,
wR (F2, all reÑ.) \ 0.1462, R [I [ 2p(I)] \ 0.0592. The
1
powder X-ray di†raction pattern measured on the commercial
powder corresponds precisely to that calculated on the basis
of the single-crystal structure. Crystal data for 3 were collected
on a Nonius CAD4 di†ractometer equipped with an Oxford
Cryostream liquid-N device: Rb C O , T \ 223(2) K,
2
2 6 6
M \ 339.00, Monoclinic, C2/m, a \ 12.522(4), b \ 8.354(4),
c \ 3.761(3) A, b \ 96.93(5)¡, V \ 390.6(4)
A 3, Z \ 2,
F(000) \ 316, k \ 12.528 mm~1, h range 3È28¡, 1001 reÑec-
tions, 501 independent, reÐnement on F2 for 36 parameters,
wR (F2, all reÑ.) \ 0.1061, R [I [ 2p(I)] \ 0.0374. Both dif-
1
fractometers equipped with a graphite monochromator (Mo-
Ka radiation, j \ 0.710 73 A). SHELXS-979a and SHELXL-
979a were used for structure solution and reÐnement based on
F2. SCHAKAL999b was used for the graphical representation
of the results.
CCDC reference numbers 163618 and 163619. See http://
data in CIF or other electronic format.
Fig. 2 (a) The distribution of C O 2~ dianions and Rb` cations in
6
6
the layers of crystalline Rb C O . (b) The layer stacking, note how
2
6 6
the C O 2~ dianions (interplanar distance 3.30 A) are shifted while
6
6
the Rb` cations are in close contact, forming a cationic pile. RbÉ É ÉO
distances in the range 2.904(6)È3.369(7) A.
Acknowledgements
We thank M.U.R.S.T. (projects ““Supramolecular DevicesÏÏ
1999È2000 and ““Solid SupermoleculesÏÏ 2000È2001) and the
Universities of Bologna (project ““Innovative MaterialsÏÏ) and
Sassari for Ðnancial support.
structure of 3 is shown in Fig. 2. Both the dianion and its
crystal possess some remarkable features: (i) the crystal is
formed of layers of rhodizonate dianions, C O 2~, organised
6
6
with pseudo-sixfold symmetry within the layer [see Fig. 2(a)];
the C O 2~ units lie Ñat on each other at an interplanar dis-
6
6
tance of 3.30 A; (ii) the Rb cations form cationic rows in
between the rhodizonate units [see Fig. 2(b)]. Similar stacking
has been recently observed in crystalline potassium croconate
dihydrate.11
Notes and references
1
2
3
(a) R. West, Oxocarbons, Academic Press, New York, 1980; (b) F.
Serratosa, Acc. Chem. Res., 1983, 16, 170.
(a) R. West and D. L. Powell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1963, 82, 6204;
(b) J. Aihara, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 1633.
Within the dianion there are two independent CÈO dis-
tances [1.252(9) and 1.248(6) A] and two independent CÈC
distances [1.468(6) and 1.469(6) A]. These latter values are
intermediate between those of aromatic systems12a and those
expected for a cyclic ÈC(2O)ÈC(2O)È system [1.508(6), 1.518(6)
(a) M. R. Bartsch, H. J. Kobus and K. P. Wainwright, J. Forensic
Sci., 1999, 41, 1046; (b) E. J. Scharman and E. P. Krenzelok, J.
T oxicol., Clin. T oxicol., 1996, 34, 699; (c) E. J. Esswein, M. Boeni-
ger and K. Ashley, US Pat. 97-49352, 1997; (d) M. T. Ganzerli
Valentini, L. Maggi and V. Caramella Crespi, J. Radioanal. Nucl.
Chem., 1997, 221, 105; (e) M. T. Ganzerli Valentini, L. Maggi and
V. Caramella Crespi, Anal. Chem., 1999, 71, 162; ( f ) M. T. Gan-
zerli Valentini, L. Maggi and V. Caramella Crespi, J. Radioanal.
Nucl. Chem., 1997, 221, 109; (g) E. A. Terpetschning, Ger. Pat.
19815659, 1998; US Pat. 83820, 1998.
A in croconic acid,6a 1.537 A from a CSD12b search of dike-
tonic six-membered ring systems]. The value of 1.468(5) A is
2
also slightly shorter than predicted theoretically in a recent
computational study of isolated oxocarbon dianions.13
Whether this di†erence is due to a signiÐcant aromatic contri-
bution to the CÈC bonds, or to the fact that, in the solid state,
the rhodizonate anion interacts with the cations, needs further
investigation.
In this context, it is worth noting that the interplanar dis-
tance between the dianions along the stack is even shorter
than in graphite and in many other systems where pÈp stack-
ing is observed.14 We believe that this short separation is due
to the Rb cations, which pinch together dianions along the
stacking sequence, this being a manifestation of the ““charge
compressionÏÏ e†ect previously discussed in the cases of the
stacking of Ñat squarate and hydrogen squarate ions.15
Since hydration of rhodizonic acid can be achieved in a
reversible solid-state process, we are currently exploring the
possibility of using the uptake of nucleophilic molecules via a
heterogeneous process, to prepare other adducts.
4
5
D. Braga, L. Maini, L. Prodi, A. Caneschi, R. Sessoli and F. Gre-
pioni, Chem. Eur. J., 2000, 6, 1310.
(a) D. Braga and F. Grepioni, Acc. Chem. Res., 2000, 33, 601; (b)
D. Braga, L. Maini, F. Grepioni, F. Mota, C. Rovina and J. J.
Novoa, Chem. Eur. J., 2000, 6, 4536; (c) D. Braga, J. J. Novoa
and F. Grepioni, New J. Chem., 2001, 25, 226.
6
7
(a) D. Braga, L. Maini and F. Grepioni, CrystEngComm, 2001, 6;
Bailey, J. Chem. Soc. B, 1971, 627; (c) R. I. Gelb, L. M. Schartz
and D. A. Laufer, J. Phys. Chem., 1978, 18, 1985.
2,3,5,5,6,6-Hexahydroxycyclohex-2-ene-1,4-dione was purchased
from Aldrich. The product of the dehydration process was identi-
Ðed as rhodizonic acid 2 on the basis of mass spectrometric mea-
surements (highest peak at m/z 205 for 1 and m/z 169 for 2).
W. Stadeli, R. Hollenstein and W. von Philipsborn, Helv. Chim.
Acta, 1977, 60, 948.
8
9
(a) G. M. Sheldrick, SHELX-97, Program for Crystal Structure
Determination, University of Gottingen, Germany, 1997; (b) E.
Keller, SCHAKAL99, Program for Graphical Representation of
Molecular Models, University of Freiburg, Germany, 1999.
Note added in proof. While this paper was being processed,
we have become aware of the report by Lam and Mak
of the structure of the rhodizonate dianion in the
salt [Bun N`] C O 2~ É 4PhNHCONH : C.-K. Lam and
10 P. W. Preisler and L. Berger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1942, 64, 67.
11 J. D. Dunitz, P. Seiler and W. Czechtizky, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2001, 40, 1779.
4
2 6
6
2
T. C. W. Mak, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1568.
1222
New J. Chem., 2001, 25, 1221È1223