4736
M. C. Bellucci, A. Volonterio / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 4733–4737
Table 2 (continued)
Entry
R1N3
R2-NCO
Carbodiimide
Acid
Product
Yielda (%)
N3
NCO
OMe
O
N
N
C
N
OMe
COOH
Br
MeO
2b
N
3g
1c
O
4b
4b
5
75
7e
N3
1d
NCO
O
N
N
N
C
N
COOH
Br
N
2a
3e
6
7
64
70
O
7f
N3
1d
NCO
Br
COOH
Br
O
C
N
Br
N
2a
3e
4c
N
O
7g
a
Overall yields.
starting acid 4a. However, the reaction was not regioselective at all,
producing a 1:1 mixture of the two regioisomers 6d, 6d0 although
in high yields (Table 1, entry 6).16 Finally, acid 4b reacted effi-
ciently also with N,N0-diaryl carbodiimide, such as N,N0-diphenyl
carbodiimide 3e, giving the formation of the corresponding N-acyl
urea derivative 6e in high yields (Table 1, entry 7).
In conclusion, we have developed a novel and efficient process
for the synthesis of libraries of N,N0-disubstituted-5-arylidendihy-
dropyrimidine-2,4-diones through a three-component sequential
reaction that occurs in very mild conditions, involving simple
and readily accessible starting materials. The operational simplic-
ity and the good chemical yields, combined with favorable atom-
economy aspects and a small number of synthetic steps, render
this new synthetic strategy attractive and promising for the prep-
aration of the target compounds. The application of this methodol-
ogy to other Baylis–Hillman adducts and the functionalization of
the C@C double bond of the final compounds are currently in pro-
gress in our laboratories and will be reported in a forthcoming full
paper.
Next, we investigated the use of a suitable base to trigger the
cyclization in situ, thus in DCM as solvent, in order to obtain the
target N,N0-disubstituted-5-arylidendihydropyrimidine-2,4-diones
7 with a sequential process. After careful screening of the bases
and conditions,17 the best results were obtained by adding at
0 °C 1.5 equiv of potassium tert-butoxide to the DCM solution once
18
the N-acylurea is formed (see scheme in Table 2).
Thus with these results in hand, we studied the possibility to
obtain the target molecules through a multi-component sequential
process consisting in (1) in situ formation of the reacting carbodii-
mides 3 by Staudinger reaction, performed in DCM, of azides 1 and
isocyanates 2, (2) addition to the resulting solutions of acids 4 once
the carbodiimide is already formed (TLC monitoring), and (3) final
addition of potassium tert-butoxide once the N-acylurea interme-
diates are formed (TLC monitoring). The process and the results
are summarized in Table 2.
Accordingly, Staudinger reaction, performed in DCM, of benzyl
azide 1a and phenyl isocyanate 2a gave the clean formation of
the corresponding carbodiimide 3c along with Ph3PO byproduct.
Without isolating the carbodiimide, acids 1a-c were added and
the resulting N-acylureas cyclized by adding, in situ, potassium
tert-butoxide, leading to the final regiospecific formation of N-
benzyl,N0-phenyl-5-arylidendihydropyrimidine-2,4-diones 7a–c,
respectively, in high yields (Table 2, entries 1–3). Acid 4b reacted
smoothly also with in situ formed carbodiimides 3f,g giving rise
to the formation, after cyclization, of compounds 7d,e, respectively,
as the only regioisomers, confirming that the reaction with
‘strongly asymmetric’ carbodiimides is totally regioselective inde-
pendently from the nature of the N-alkyl and N0-aryl substituents.
Finally, the process worked smoothly also with symmetric N,N0-
diaryl carbodiimides. Indeed, starting from phenyl azide 1d and
phenyl isocyanate 2a, at the end of the MC process performed with
acids 4b,c we could obtain the formation of N,N0-diphenyl-5-ary-
lidendihydropyrimidine-2,4-diones 7f,g in very good overall yields
(Table 1, entries 6 and 7).
Acknowledgments
Mr. Marco Barozzi and Mr. Andrea Bassani are acknowledged
for performing preliminary experiments.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,
References and notes
1. For some reviews on MC reactions, see: (a) Armstrong, R. M.; Combs, A. P.;
Brown, P. A.; Keating, T. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 123–131; (b)
Bienaymé, H.; Hulme, C.; Oddon, G.; Schmitt, P. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6,
3321–3329; (c) Dömling, A.; Ugi, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3169–
3210; (d) Dömling, A. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 318–323; (e) Dömling,
A. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 17–89; (f) Isambert, N.; Lavilla, R. Chem. Eur. J.
2008, 14, 8444–8454; (g) Ganem, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 463–472; (h)
Ruijter, E.; Scheffelaar, R.; Orru, R. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6234–
6246.
2. Andraos, J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2005, 9, 149–163.
3. (a) Orru, R. V. A.; de Greef, M. Synthesis 2003, 1471–1499; (b) Balme, G.;
Bossharth, E.; Monteiro, N. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 34, 4101–4111.
4. Lowe, J. A., III; Archer, R. L.; Chapin, D. S.; Cheng, J. B.; Helweg, D.; Johonson, J.
L.; Koe, B. K.; Lebel, L. A.; Moore, P. F.; Nielsen, J. A.; Russo, L. L.; Shirley, J. T. J.
Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 624–628.
5. Shimazaki, N.; Yamazaki, H.; Yatanabe, T.; Tanaka, H. Chem. Abstr. 1992, 117,
131217.