A R T I C L E S
Vangala et al.
tural hierarchies4 in terms of synthons rather than interactions
or functional groups.
1) that contain four molecular functionalities. These are
respectively, the hydroxy group (phenolic), the amino group
(anilino), phenyl rings, and a linker group, typically a polym-
ethylene chain, which links phenyl rings. We attempt to find
the correspondence between molecular structure and crystal
structure for these compounds. We show that, in many cases,
the observed crystal structures result from a fine balance between
several factors leading to both hierarchic packing and to
structures wherein interaction interference is more pronounced.
The family of aminophenols or supraminols, molecules that
contain equal stoichiometries of hydroxyl and amino groups,
offers sufficient structural consistency with enough supramo-
lecular diversity to explore properly the interactions between
molecular functionality in crystal packing. Ermer and co-
workers5 and Hanessian and co-workers6 elaborated elegant
principles of recognition for such molecules. According to these
researchers, an -OH group with one hydrogen bond donor and
two acceptors and an -NH2 group with two hydrogen bond
donors and one acceptor constitute a mutually compatible set
of molecular functionalitysone that permits the formation of
one O-H‚‚‚N and two N-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bonds resulting in
a complete saturation of the hydrogen bonding potential of both
functional groups. In molecules such as 4-aminophenol (4AP),
these hydrogen bonds form a N(H)O sheet structure in which
the hydrogen bonds are arranged in a hexagonal manner, like
the chair form of cyclohexane (Figure 1). We use the notation
N(H)O in this paper to simultaneously refer to O-H‚‚‚N and
N-H‚‚‚O hydrogen bonds. This arrangement is topologically
equivalent to the sheet structure of â-arsenic and will be re-
ferred to as such in this paper. The â-As sheet and its variants
have been noted in a number of N(H)O structures of suprami-
nols.7 Independently, Howard, Desiraju, and co-workers8 rec-
ognized that factors other than N(H)O saturation need to be
considered even for some simple aminols. In 2- and 3-ami-
nophenol (2AP, 3AP), for example, the potential for the
formation of strong O-H‚‚‚N and N-H‚‚‚O bonds is not
completely fulfilled. Instead, there is the formation of a weak
N-H‚‚‚π hydrogen bridge9 (Figure 2). These authors rational-
ized this behavior as being driven by the need to form
herringbone interactions between phenyl residues. The change
from the 4AP structure to the 2AP and 3AP structures is
therefore a change from a more hierarchical arrangement to one
where there is more structural interference10 between molecular
functionality. In effect, even with just three functional groups,
hydroxy, amino, and phenyl, there are two quite distinct
structural possibilities.
Experimental Section
General Methods. Melting points of compounds 1-5 were mea-
sured on a Perkin-Elmer Model DSC-4 melting point apparatus. All
other melting points were recorded on a Fisher-Johns melting point
apparatus and are uncorrected. All reactions were carried out using
standard techniques and general literature procedures. The synthesis
of the aminophenols in this study are given, whenever there is a
significant variation from the literature procedures. Details of the
synthetic procedures for compounds 1-5, 1a, 2a, 2b, 2c, 3a, 2d, 1b,
and 6a are given in the Supporting Information.
X-ray and Neutron Data Collections and Crystal Structure
Determinations. Diffraction quality single crystals of all compounds
were obtained by slow evaporation from various solvents. The X-ray
data were collected on a Bruker SMART-1000 diffractometer (1-5,
2b, 2c, 3a, 1b) or the Bruker SMART-6000 diffractometer (1a, 2d,
and 6a) using Mo KR radiation. X-ray data for 2a were collected on a
Rigaku AFC6S diffractometer using Cu KR radiation. The structure
solution and refinements were carried out using SHELXTL programs.11a
The neutron structure determination of 1 was carried out at the ISIS
pulsed neutron source on the Laue time-of-flight diffractometer,
SXD,11b,c using the multicrystal method:11d a sample of 4 crystals was
mounted in the SXD ω-CCR and data collected at 12 K in a series of
10 frames with 25°ω steps. Intensities from all four crystals were
extracted, resulting in 2403 unique, merged reflections. All interatomic
distance and related calculations were carried out with PLATON2002.12
For further details see Table 1 and the Supporting Information.
Results and Discussion
A. Methylene Spacer Structures. Ermer and Eling noted5
that 4-(4-aminophenyl)phenol (4APP) forms a structure that is
directly analogous to 4AP, consisting of parallel â-As sheets
linked by a biphenyl spacer groupsthe phenyl group in 4AP is
in effect replaced by the biphenyl group in 4APP (Figures 1b
and 1c). Both molecules are in the same space group (Pna21)
with similar dimensions for the a (∼8.1 Å) and b (∼5.3 Å)
axes, and this is the plane of â-As sheets. The change in spacer
is reflected in the length of the c axis, which at 12.95 Å for
4AP, and 21.22Å for 4APP, is approximately equal to the
molecular length.
By examining these two â-As structures, the question arose
as to whether this structure type could be reproduced with more
extended linking units between the aniline and phenol moieties.
To study this question, and to establish the requirements for
â-As sheet formation in higher aminophenols, a series of
4-amino-4′-hydroxydiphenyl-n-alkanes (where n ) 1-5) were
synthesized. In effect, 4APP is the n ) 0 compound. This series
of homologated aminols also provides an opportunity for
The present paper explores these ideas further and provides
an analysis of the crystal structures of 13 supraminols (Scheme
(4) (a) Aakero¨y, C. B.; Beatty, A. M.; Helfrich, B. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 14425. (b) Vishweshwar, P.; Nangia, A.; Lynch, V. M. Cryst. Growth
Des. 2003, 3, 783.
(5) Ermer, O.; Eling, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 925.
(6) (a) Hanessian, S.; Gomtsyan, A.; Simard, M.; Roelens, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 4495. (b) Hanessian, S.; Simard, M.; Roelens, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7630. (c) Hanessian, S.; Saladino, R.; Margarita,
R.; Simard, M. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2169. (d) Hanessian, S.; Saladino,
R. In Crystal Design. Structure and Function. Perspectives in Supramo-
lecular Chemistry, Vol 7; Desiraju, G. R., Ed.; Wiley: New York; 2003,
p 77.
(7) Selected references that describe the structural chemistry of supraminols
include the following: (a) Loehlin, J. H.; Etter, M. C.; Gendreau, C.;
Cervasio, E. Chem. Mater. 1998, 6, 1218. (b) Loehlin, J. H.; Franz, K. J.;
Gist, L.; Moore, R. H. Acta Crystallogr. 1998, B54, 695. (c) Toda, F.;
Hyoda, S.; Okada, K.; Hirotsu. K. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995,
1531. (d) Roelens, S.; Dapporto, P.; Paoli, P. Can. J. Chem. 2000, 78,
723. (e) Dapporto, P.; Paoli, P.; Roelens, S. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4930.
(f) Lewinski, J.; Zachara, J.; Kopec, T.; Starawiesky, B. K.; Lipkowski, J.;
Justyniak, I.; Kolodziejczyk, E. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 5, 1123. (g)
O’Leary, B.; Splading, T. R.; Ferguson, G.; Glidewell, C. Acta Crystallogr.
2000, B56, 273.
(11) (a) SHELXTL version 5.1. Bruker AXS: Madison, WI, 2001. (b) Wilson,
C. C. J. Mol. Struct. 1997, 405, 207. (c) Allen, F. H.; Howard, J. A. K.;
Hoy, V. J.; Desiraju, G. R.; Reddy, D. S.; Wilson, C. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 4081. (d) Wilson, C. C. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1997, 30,
184.
(12) Spek, A. L. PLATON, A multipurpose Crystallographic Tool, Utrecht
University, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2002.
(8) Allen, F. H.; Hoy, V. J.; Howard, J. A. K.; Thalladi, V. R.; Desiraju, G.
R.; Wilson, C. C.; McIntyre, G. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3477.
(9) Desiraju, G. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 565.
(10) (a) Desiraju, G. R. Nature 2001, 412, 397. (b) Madhavi, N. N. L.; Bilton,
C.; Howard, J. A. K.; Allen, F. H.; Nangia, A.; Desiraju, G. R. New J.
Chem. 2000, 24, 1.
9
14496 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 47, 2003