was successfully applied in total synthesis.3f,h,4d An ob-
vious drawback of this approach is the requirement of a
stoichiometric amount of the directing group and addi-
tional steps for its connection and removal.
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
entry
x mol %
y mol %
z bar
convna
1b
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
10
10
10
20
20
20
40
20
40
40
40
40
0c
25
3
50
4
100
100d
23e
5
6
a The conversions were determined by 1H NMR. b The reaction was
carried out without distillation of the substrate. c The starting material
was recovered completely. d Overreaction proceeded, and 2a was not
obtained, 72 h reaction time. e Three aldehydes and 2a was observed.
substrate (Table 1). Surprisingly, employing 1a without
prior distillative purification, and treating it with a catalyst
prepared from Rh(CO)2acac (1 mol %) and Ph2POMe
Figure 1. Hydroformylation with a catalyst-directing group
(CDG) needed only in catalytic amounts through reversible
covalent substrate binding.
˚
˚
(10 mol %), in the presence of molecular sieves 4 A (MS4 A)
under 40 bar of CO/H2 gas at 80 °C for 18 h resulted in the
complete recovery of the starting material (entry 1). This
proved the necessity of predistillation to remove traces of
water or peroxide which could deactivate the catalyst.
Although the reaction with the distilled substrate 1a under
20 bar gave the desired lactol 2a, the conversion was only
25% (entry 2). The conversion was improved to 50% at
40 bar (entry 3). The reaction with 2 mol % Rh catalyst
and 20 mol % ligand at 40 bar provided 2a in 100%
conversion (entry 4). When the reaction was performed
under the same conditions for 72 h, overreaction also
proceeded, and 2a was not observed (entry 5). A catalyst
prepared from 1 mol % of Rh(CO)2(acac) and 10 mol %
of PPh3 provided a mixture of 2a and the other three
diastereomers in a stereorandom fashion in 23% con-
version, proving the directing role of the phosphinite
system.
Recently, Tan’s group5 and we6 independently reported
the study of catalytic amounts of covalently but reversibly
bound catalyst-directing groups for hydroformylation re-
actions (Figure 1). These studies proved that the employed
ligands are required in catalytic amounts and enable us to
perform hydroformylation of homoallylic and bishomoallylic
alcohols under mild conditions to afford branched alde-
hydes selectively through a chelated transition state in an
intramolecular manner. Herein, we report the diastereose-
lective hydroformylation of cyclic dienes,7 known as chal-
lenging substrates for hydroformylation, employing a
phosphinite ligand bound covalently but reversibly on
the substrates.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of 1-Methyl-2,5-cyclohexadienyl-1-
methanol 1a
In comparison to the previous result obtained with a
simple homoallylic alcohol,6 this substrate needs harsher
conditions(higheramount of catalyst, higherpressure, and
higher temperature). Generally, cyclic alkenes are less
reactive to hydroformylation catalysts than both trans-
and cis-1,2-disubstituted alkenes. Additionally, formation
of a covalent bond between the ligand and 1a bearing
1,4-Cyclohexadienes have been employed for several
desymmetrization reactions.8 The substrate, 1-methyl-2,5-
cyclohexadienyl-1-methanol 1a bearing a hydroxy group in
an appropriate homoallylic position, was easily prepared
from benzoic acid and methyl iodide via Birch alkylation
and followed by lithium aluminum hydride (LAH) reduc-
tion to provide 1a in 67% yield over 2 steps (Scheme 1).
First, the reaction conditions were optimized with
1-methyl-2,5-cyclohexadienyl-1-methanol1aas a standard
(5) (a) Lightburn, T. E.; Dombrowski, M. T.; Tan, K. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9210. (b) Worthy, A. D.; Gagnon, M. M.;
Dombrowski, M. T.; Tan, K. L. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2764. (c) Sun, X.;
Frimpong, K.; Tan, K. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11841.
(d) Worthy, A. D.; Joe, C. L.; Lightburn, T. E.; Tan, K. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14757.
€
(6) (a) Grunanger, C. U.; Breit, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
€
967–970. (b) Grunanger, C. U.; Breit, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
7346.
(7) Spencer, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1977, 124, 85.
(8) (a) Studer, A.; Schleth, F. Synlett 2005, 20, 3033. (b) Nakahara,
K.; Fujioka, H. Symmetry 2010, 2, 437 and references therein.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 4, 2011
613