1
Table 1. Differences in H NMR Chemical Shift Value for
Table 2. 1H NMR Chemical Shift Data for
Methyl-3R,7R,16R-triacetoxy-5â-cholane-24-oate in CDCl3
Steroid 5 and ∆16-Steroid 7 (in CDCl3)
18-CH3
19-CH3
21-CH3
5
7
0.68
0.76
0.99
1.02
0.92
1.01
∆δ
-0.08
-0.03
-0.09
(3R,7R,16R, 24-tetrol), as observed earlier by Iida et al.6
Spectral data of 8 matched with the data published in ref 6,
confirming the site-specific introduction of the hydroxyl
group at the 16R-position. Our next aim was to oxidize the
primary alcohol (24-OH) in the presence of three secondary
alcohols. In the earlier work by Iida et al., the tetrol was
oxidized to the triketo carboxylic acid,6 but the selective
reduction of the oxo groups of the triketo methyl ester did
not lead to satisfactory selectivity in favor of R-OH groups
(yield 16%). Therefore, we felt the need for an efficient
method of oxidation of 8 to the final product. Initially, the
24-OH was selectively protected (trityl), followed by the
protection of the secondary alcohols (acetate) and subsequent
deprotection/oxidation of the CH2OTr under acidic condition
(Jones reagent).10 The final product (10) was then obtained
by cleaving the acetate groups (not shown).
derived from synthetic
avicholic acida
derived from naturally
occurring avicholic acidb
18-CH3
19-CH3
21-CH3
OAc’s
CO2Me
3â-H
0.702
0.928
0.960 (d, 6.6 Hz)
1.992, 2.037, 2.043
3.650
4.591
4.817
4.938 (br t, 6.6 Hz)
0.702
0.928
0.960 (d, 6.5 Hz)
1.997, 2.035, 2.049
3.649
4.591
4.813
4.939 (br t, 6.5 Hz)
7â-H
16â-H
a This work. b Reference 5.
vibronic bands (I3/I1) in the fluorescence spectrum of pyrene
is indicative of the polarity experienced by the probe
solubilized in the micellar aggregates.13 Using this technique,
we have measured the CMC values of dihydroxy (cheno-
deoxycholate, and 7-deoxycholate) and trihydroxy (avicholate
and cholate) bile salts. The CMCs of avicholate and cholate
at pH 9 were found to be ca. 15 mM (Figure 3), whereas
Unsatisfactory overall yield and long reaction times (2 days
for 24-O-tritylation) compelled us to go for an alternative
oxidation methodology. Einhorn et al.11 had successfully
performed the oxidation of a primary diol to the correspond-
ing lactone using TEMPO-mediated N-chlorosuccinimide
oxidation in a biphasic mixture using a phase transfer catalyst
+
such as BnNEt3 Cl-. By employing the same methodology
(with slight variation in the condition; see Scheme 1 and
Supporting Information) a one-step oxidation of 8 to avi-
cholic lactone (9) has been accomplished. Spectral data for
9 matched with the data reported for 3R,7R-dihydroxy-5â-
cholane O-24,16R-lactone.6 Cleavage of the lactone (5%
KOH/MeOH), acidification (cold 1 M HCl), and quick
extraction yielded 10. Longer exposer of 10 to an acidic
aqueous medium always led to partial lactonization. This
facile lactonization of 16R-hydroxy bile acid was also
reported for pythocholic (3R,12R,16R-trihydroxy) acid.12 It
was suggested that the 16-hydroxyl group is in a geo-
metrically favorable position to form an ꢀ-lactone. After the
avicholic acid was obtained, the triacetoxy methyl ester
derivative was prepared to compare with the data published
for the same compound from avicholic acid Hagey et al.
isolated from the avian bile (Table 2).
Figure 3. The ratio of vibronic bands (III/I) of pyrene fluorescence
as a function of bile salt concentration at pH 9 (TRIS buffer) at 25
°C: (O) chenodeoxycholate, (9) 7-deoxycholate, (]) cholate, (b)
avicholate.
Since there was no report on the aggregation behavior of
avicholate in aqueous medium, we decided to study the
micellization of avicholate in aqueous solution. Pyrene was
used as a fluorescent probe to measure the CMC (critical
micellar concentration) of avicholate. The ratio of the two
chenodeoxycholate (3R,7R-dihydroxy) and 7-deoxycholate
(3R,12R-dihydroxy) had CMCs below 5 mM.14 The intro-
duction of the third hydroxyl group increased the aqueous
(10) Matsuoka, K.; Kurosawa, H.; Esumi, Y.; Terunuma, D.; Kuzuhara,
H. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 329, 765.
(11) Einhorn, J.; Einhorn, C.; Ratajczak, F. Pierre, J. L. J. Org. Chem.
1996, 61, 7452.
(12) (a) Haslewood, G. A. D.; Wootton, V. Biochem. J. 1950, 47, 584.
(b) Haslewood, G. A. D.; Wootton, V. Biochem. J. 1951, 49, 67.
(13) Kalyansundaram. K.; Thomas, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99,
2039.
(14) (a) Coello, A.; Meijide, F.; Nu´n˜ez, E. R.; Tato, J. V. J. Pharm. Sci.
1996, 85, 9. (b) Gouin, S.; Zhu, X. X. Langmuir 1998, 14, 4025.
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 1, 2004
33