Table 1 Photophysical properties and electrochemical data of complexes 1–5
labs/nm, CH2Cl2 at
Entry
Formula
RT (e/M21cm21
)
lem/nma
538 (541)f
557 (537)
563 (561)
574 (602)
539 (545)
530e
to/msa
Fem
0.13
kr/103 s21b
2.02
Epa/Vc
+1.75
+1.68
+1.64
+1.60
+1.74
—
Epc/Vc
1
2
3
4
5
[Os(CO)3(tfa)(dbm)]
[Os(CO)3Cl(dbm)]
[Os(CO)3Br(dbm)]
[Os(CO)3I(dbm)]
280 (21900)
367 (20000)
285 (19100)
372 (16200)
278 (19200)
375 (15600)
278 (23800)
380 (13500)
64 (3.0)f
46 (9.1)
29 (4.2)
0.72, 38 (2.7)
53 (3.4)
5 3 104
21.53
21.60
21.58
21.59
21.55
21.20
0.13
0.08
0.007
0.13
2.76
2.82
0.18
[Os(CO)3(SCN)(dbm)] 277 (26300)
372 (15300)
[(dbm)Na]
2.49
352 (22100)d
< 1023
< 0.05
a Solvent: CH2Cl2 and excitation wavelength: 380 nm. b kr = Fem/t. c In CH3CN with 0.1 M nBu4NPF6 (TBAH) supporting electrolyte and Ag/AgCl
reference electrode at RT; scan rate 100 mV s21, while Epa and Epc refer to the irreversible anodic and cathodic peak potentials, respectively. d Data recorded
in CH3CN. e The emission data were taken in a 77 K methanol glass. f Data in parentheses () were obtained in the solid state. Note that a faster decay
component ( < 0.2 ms) was observed for 1–5 in the solid state possibly due to the defective sites. Its integrated intensity is < 10% and is thus neglected.
manifesting the unusually strong spin–orbit coupling induced
by Os.
A unique, strong phosphorescence was also observed for 1–5
in the solid state, and the corresponding emission and lifetime
data are listed in Table 1. In comparison to that measured in the
solution phase the lifetime in solid state is relatively short,
possibly due to the crystal packing effect.
In summary, a new series of the Os(II) complexes with the
dbm chelate were synthesized. The results represent a rare class
of complexes possessing lowest excited states localized pre-
dominantly on the dbm ligand, resulting in unusually strong,
long-lived phosphorescence in room-temperature fluid solution
as well as in solid crystal. This class of Os(II) complexes with
profound photophysical and electrochemical data provided may
be advantageously exploited in a variety of photochemical
studies such as OLED or photovoltaic devices. Furthermore, the
Fig. 2 Absorption and emission spectra of complexes 1, 2 and 4 in CH2Cl2
current successes in assembling the Re-containing supramole-
solution.
cules may warrant a similar applicability of the dibenzoylme-
thanate Os(II) complexes. Work on the relevant subjects is in
progress and will be published in a forthcoming full paper.
1
because the corresponding MLCT signal of the related Os(II
)
polypyridyl complexes also occurs in the same region,8 the
possibility of a small contribution from the MLCT transition
cannot be ruled out.
Notes and references
Complexes 1–5 exhibit bright emission in deaerated CH2Cl2.
The hypsochromic shift of the emission peak maximum is in the
order of tfa ≈ SCN > Cl > Br > I, consistent with the trend
of electron withdrawing strength destabilizing the HOMO of
dbm and hence increasing the energy gap. The emission lifetime
is unusually long ( > 20 ms),9 while the quantum efficiencies,
except for 4, were measured to be as high as 0.08–0.13. In
addition, the emission was drastically quenched by O2 with a
1 (a) D. J. Stufkens, Comments Inorg. Chem., 1992, 13, 359; (b) A. P. Zipp,
L. Sacksteder, J. Streich, A. Cook, J. N. Demas and B. A. DeGraff, Inorg.
Chem., 1993, 32, 5629; (c) L. Sacksteder, M. Lee, J. N. Demas and B. A.
DeGraff, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 8230; (d) B. D. Rossenaar, D. J.
Stufkens and A. Vlcek, Jr., Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 2902; (e) V. W.-W.
Yam, V. C.-Y. Lau and L.-X. Wu, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1998,
1461; (f) A. Vogler and H. Kunkely, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2000, 200–202,
991; (g) D. R. Striplin and G. A. Crosby, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2001, 211,
163.
2 (a) S. Leininger, B. Olenyuk and P. J. Stang, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 853;
(b) S.-S. Sun and A. J. Lees, Organometallics, 2002, 21, 39; (c) S. M.
Woessner, J. B. Helms, J. F. Houlis and B. P. Sullivan, Inorg. Chem.,
1999, 38, 4380; (d) V. W.-W. Yam, Chem. Commun., 2001, 789.
3 A. J. Deeming, N. P. Randle, P. A. Bates and M. B. Hursthouse, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans., 1988, 2753.
4 J.-H. Gong, D.-K. Hwang, C.-W. Tsay, Y. Chi, S.-M. Peng and G.-H.
Lee, Organometallics, 1994, 13, 1720.
5 S. Rosenberg, A. W. Herlinger, W. S. Mahoney and G. L. Geoffroy,
Inorg. Synth., 1989, 25, 187.
6 H.-L. Yu, Y. Chi, C.-S. Liu, S.-M. Peng and G.-H. Lee, Chem. Vap.
Deposition, 2001, 7, 245.
7 A. J. Deeming, M. N. Meah, N. P. Randle and K. I. Hardcastle, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans, 1989, 2211.
rate ~ 1.52 3 109 M21 21
for 2 in CH2Cl2. These observations
s
lead us to assign the emission to be phosphorescent in nature.
Further support is given by the power-dependent relaxation
dynamics. On increasing the excitation intensity the decay
becomes non-single exponential, indicating the prevalence of
triplet–triplet annihilation upon high triplet-state population.
Note that a shorter lifetime was also observed for the iodide
complex 4 (see Table 1), and is tentatively proposed to originate
from photodissociation due to the weak Os–I bond, as indicated
by the change of absorption spectral features as well as the
decrease of 574 nm phosphorescence upon a long period of
photolysis.
A comparative experiment was also performed for the dbm
anion (dbm)Na in basified (NaOH) methanol, and a phospho-
rescence maximized at ~ 530 nm was resolved in a 77 K
methanol glass, of which the spectral feature resembles that
observed in complexes 1–5. This result concludes that the room-
temperature phosphorescence in 1–5 originates predominantly
from the 3p–p* manifold of ligated dbm. The main difference in
phosphorescence properties lies in the much faster radiative
decay rate in the Os complexes (see Table 1 for comparison),
8 (a) J. V. Caspar, T. D. Westmoreland, G. H. Allen, P. G. Bradley, T. J.
Meyer and W. H. Woodruff, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 3492; (b) D.
R. Striplin and G. A. Crosby, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1994, 221, 426; (c) M.
E. Garcia Posse, N. E. Katz, L. M. Baraldo, D. D. Polonuer, C. G.
Colombano and J. A. Olabe, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34, 1830; (d) J. Y. K.
Cheng, K.-K. Cheung and C.-M. Che, Chem. Commun., 1997, 623.
9 Other examples are [MoCl12]
22, [Au(dppm)2]2+ and [Pt(dppe)(5,6-
Me2phen)]2+, see: K. T. Wan and C. M. Che, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1990, 140.
CHEM. COMMUN., 2003, 3046–3047
3047