Scheme 1
Scheme 2
solution or solid state, can control a mode of reaction. Such
a control, a choice of specific reaction out of some possible
reactions from the same starting material, is attractive not
only from synthetic viewpoints but also from a mechanistic
understanding. However, successful examples of this kind
of control are very limited. Photochemical reaction of 2,4-
cyclohexadienones is an example in which the mode of
reaction can be controlled by the irradiation wavelength or
the solvent polarity of the reaction media.9 Herein we report
the novel reaction mode control in photochemical reaction
of 2-pyridone derivatives.
To carry out [4 + 4] photodimerization effectively in the
solid state, we designed phenyl ether derivatives 1a-d. These
derivatives were prepared by Williamson ether synthesis from
3-chloromethyl-2-pyridone10 and 4-alkoxyphenols. The phen-
yl rings are expected to assist crystal packing through an
intermolecular aromatic interaction such as face-to-face or
edge-to-face stacking.11 In addition to this, the 2-pyridone
moiety also contributes to an efficient stacking for [4 + 4]
dimerization via bimolecular dipole-dipole interaction.4b
Prior to the solid-state reaction of 1, their photoreaction in
solution was examined.
Irradiation was conducted externally with a 450W high-
pressure mercury lamp through a Pyrex filter. A benzene
solution of 1a-d at 0.3 or 0.03 M was irradiated at 0 °C for
8 h under an argon atmosphere. After evaporation of solvent,
the reaction mixture was chromatographed on silica gel with
ethyl acetate-hexane (2:1) as an eluent. A photo-[1,3]
migration of pyridone methylene group, relatively well-
known for benzyl phenyl ethers,12 gave 2a-d in an isolated
yield of 30∼40% (Scheme 1). No concentration dependency
was observed for product ratios in this photolysis.
In contrast to the photolysis in solution, an alteration of
the mode of photochemical reaction occurred in solid-state
photolysis. Irradiation of 1a, 1c, and 1d in the solid state at
0 °C for 20 h resulted in a quantitative formation of the [4
+ 4] cycloadducts 3a, 3c, and 3d, respectively (Scheme 2).
The syn-anti configuration of photodimers could be deter-
mined from a coupling pattern of bridgehead protons in their
1H NMR spectra. Syn isomers should show a ddd coupling
pattern for their bridgehead protons, whereas dd should be
the characteristic coupling pattern for those of anti isomers.
The bridgehead protons of photodimers 3a, 3c, and 3d
showed a dd (J ) 7.0 and 1.2∼1.5 Hz) coupling pattern that
confirmed their stereochemistry to be anti. More specifically,
the stereochemistry of four possible [4 + 4] photodimers
(trans-anti, trans-syn, cis-anti, and cis-syn)4a derived from
2-pyridones can be defined from their Nuclear Overhauser
Effects (NOEs).13 Photodimers 3 were confirmed to have a
trans-anti configuration on the basis of NOEs observed
between N-methyl protons and the olefinic proton distant
from the bridgehead proton and between the bridgehead
proton and one of the geminal protons of phenoxymethyl
group (Scheme 2). Since the photodimers were thermally
unstable, their mass spectra (FAB) did not show the
corresponding molecular peaks. Instead, the m/z correspond-
ing to 1 was observed. The quantitative retro [4 + 4]
cycloaddition presumably took place. Therefore, the struc-
tures of photodimers were confirmed by carrying out their
reduction by hydrogenation in ethyl acetate. The reduced
photodimers 4a, 4c, and 4d showed the exact mass spectra
for them. The formation of cycloadducts implies that there
is a close overlapping between the two pyridone rings in
their crystal structures. However, irradiation of 1b in the solid
state gave 2b in 9% yield. In this case, no preference to
photodimerization was observed even in the solid state.
To elucidate solid-state photochemical behavior, we
examined the single-crystal X-ray structures of 1a14 and 1b15
(Figure 1). In the crystal structure of 1a, an efficient face-
(8) (a) Kohmoto, S.; Miyaji, Y.; Tsuruoka, M.; Kishikawa, K.; Yama-
moto, M.; Yamada, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 2082. (b)
Ihmels, H.; Schneider, M.; Waidelich, M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3247. (c)
Zimmerman, H. E.; Sereda, G. A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 283.
(9) Uppili, S.; Ramamurthy, V. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 87.
(10) Sieburth, S. McN.; McGee, K. F., Jr.; Zhang, F.; Chen, Y. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 1972.
(11) (a) Tsuzuki, S.; Honda, K.; Uchimaru, T.; Miyaji, M.; Tanabe, K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 104. (b) Sinnokrot, M. O.; Valeev, E. F.;
Sherrill, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10887.
(13) Sieburth, S. McN.; Hiel, G.; Lin, C.-H.; Kuan, D. P.J. Org. Chem.
1994, 59, 80.
(14) Crystal data for 1a: C13H13NO2, Mw ) 215.25, colorless prism,
orthorhombic Pbca, a ) 10.759(2), b ) 8.835(2), c ) 23.277(5) Å V )
2212.6(8) Å3, Z ) 8, Dcalc ) 1.292 g/cm3, λ(Mo KR) ) 0.71069 Å, µ )
0.088 mm-1, R ) 0.049, Rw ) 0.075, T ) 100 K.
(15) Crystal data for 1b: C17H21NO3, Mw ) 287.36, colorless prism,
monoclinic P21/n, a ) 13.007(1), b ) 11.100(1), c ) 13.003(1) Å, â)
56.808(5)°, V ) 1571.0(3) Å3, Z ) 4, Dcalc ) 1.215 g/cm3, λ(CuKR) )
1.54178 Å, µ ) 0.670 mm-1, R ) 0.060, Rw ) 0.072, T ) 298 K.
(12) Kelly, D. P.; Pinhey, J. T.; Rigby, R. D. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966,
5953.
684
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 5, 2004