Anderson et al.
this study. Whereas the synthesis of ferrocenyl oxazoline
palladacycle 9a (Scheme 2, R ) SiMe3) could be per-
formed on multigram scale to provide an air-stable solid,
the corresponding desilyl congener 24a (Scheme 3, R )
H) is markedly less stable, requiring storage in an
oxygen-free atmosphere to prevent decomposition. Simi-
larly, FOP complex 37 (Scheme 5) that also lacks a
substituent at C3 of the palladated cyclopentadienyl ring
displays similar instability. A substituent at C3 of this
ring obviously increases the stability of FOP catalysts.
Suzuki cross-coupling of ferrocenyl iodide 25 (Scheme
4) and aryl boronic acids proved to be a general method
to incorporate aryl substituents at C3 of the palladated
cyclopentadienyl ring. Electron-rich aryl boronic acids,
even those having an ortho substituent, coupled with
iodide 25 in high yields. More sterically hindered 2,6-
disubstituted aryl boronic acids coupled in lower yield.
Electron-deficient aryl boronic acids were also poor
coupling partners for the cross-coupling reaction as
reduction of the ferrocenyl iodide 25 and homo-coupling
of the aryl boronic acid were competitive with cross-
coupling.30
Several trends are apparent from this study of the
rearrangement of allylic N-arylbenzimidates 5 with FOP
series catalysts. First, activation of the halide-bridged
dimer FOP complexes by reaction with a silver salt is
required to generate kinetically competent catalysts for
the rearrangement of allylic N-arylbenzimidates.31 With
all the catalysts examined, somewhat higher enantio-
selectivity was observed in the rearrangement of the Z
stereoisomers of 5 than that realized in rearrangements
of the corresponding E alkene isomers. In general, Z
allylic N-arylbenzimidates rearranged to allylic amides
more slowly than the corresponding E stereoisomers. The
catalysts generated from silyl-containing complexes 9a
(Scheme 3, SiMe3) and 23 (Scheme 3, SiEt3) performed
similarly, producing benzamide 6b in >90% ee. The FOP
catalysts containing electron-rich or electron-poor aryl
groups, rather than silyl, at the C3 position of the
cyclopalladated cyclopentadienyl ring provided quite
similar results. In general, no trend in catalyst efficacy,
either in terms of rate or enantioselectivity, is apparent
as the substituents on the aryl ring are varied. The lower
enantioselectivity observed with the catalyst formed from
the unsubstituted complex 24 (Scheme 3) likely results
from decomposition of this catalyst to generate a less
selective catalyst as evidenced by the formation of a black
precipitate and mirror on the reaction vessel during the
course of the rearrangement. Rearrangements facilitated
by the catalyst generated from 40 (Scheme 5) having the
Rp configuration and the opposite relative configuration
of the oxazoline fragment yielded the opposite enantiomer
of benzamide 6b (with similar ee) to that formed with
catalysts generated from the S,Sp and S,Rp pseudo-
enantiomeric complexes 9a and 24 (Scheme 2), respec-
tively. The catalyst generated from 37 (Scheme 5) having
the S,Sp configuration gave exceptionally poor enanti-
oselectivity in the rearrangement of (E)-5b and dimin-
ished enantioselectivity in rearranging the Z stereoiso-
mer isomer compared to pseudo-diastereomeric catalysts
(9a-(S,Sp), 23-(S,Sp), and 40-(S,Rp). Despite the problems
of stability of the catalyst generated from 24 (the S,Rp
diastereomer of 37), this complex also gave much higher
enantioselectivity in the rearrangement of (E)-5b than
the catalyst generated from 37. This decrease in enan-
tioselectivity with the catalyst generated from 37 is
consistent with our hypothesis that substituents must
reside both above and below the square plane of the
palladium(II) catalyst to induce high levels of enantio-
selectivity.8
Development of More Useful Imidates for the
Synthesis of Chiral Nonracemic Allylic Amines
from Allylic Alcohols. Replacing the aryl substituent
of N-arylbenzimidates 5a (Scheme 8) with common,
electron-withdrawing nitrogen protecting groups pro-
duced imidates that either did not participate in the FOP-
catalyzed asymmetric allylic imidate rearrangement,
such as the BUS-protected benzimidate 50 (Scheme 10),
or did so with low enantioselectivity, such as the Cbz-
protected imidate 46 (Scheme 9). N-Arylbenzimidates
5b-d (Scheme 8) underwent facile rearrangement to
provide the corresponding N-arylbenzamides 6b-d in
good ee (Table 5); however, removal of the N-aryl sub-
stituent from the product allylic amides was largely
unsuccessful.29,32
N-(4-Methoxyphenyl)trifluoroacetimidates, however,
were found to be promising substrates for the catalytic
asymmetric allylic imidate rearrangement with cationic
FOP catalysts. These trifluoroacetimidates underwent
asymmetric rearrangement with enantioselectivities some-
what less than those realized in rearrangements of
comparable N-arylbenzimidates. However, the allylic
amide products formed from the former allylic imidates
have readily removed N-trifluoroacetyl substituents.
Rearrangement of E allylic N-(4-methoxyphenyl)trifluo-
roacetimidates 52 (Schemes 11 and 12) took place in good
yields and enantioselectivities, whereas the correspond-
ing Z allylic trifluoroacetimidates rearranged only slowly,
providing the rearranged allylic amides in low yield even
after prolonged reaction times. Critical to obtaining good
yields in the rearrangement of E allylic trifluoroacetimi-
dates is the inclusion of an acid scavenger (20 mol % of
1,8-bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene) in the reaction mix-
ture. Without such an additive, decomposition of the
trifluoroacetimidate was observed. Presumably, the amine
sequesters adventitious acid, thus suppressing the de-
composition pathway; trace amounts of protic acid may
be formed from the reaction of residual AgOCOCF3 with
a small amount of water under the reaction conditions.33
The rearrangement of the cinnamyl alcohol derived allylic
trifluoroacetimidate 52e (Table 6) was also problematic,
proceeding in only low yield and enantioselectivity. The
inefficient rearrangement of this imidate results from a
competitive ionization-recombination pathway, signaled
(30) This type of side reaction is common in cross-coupling reactions.
A variety of mechanisms have been forwarded to explain results of
this type; see: Nguyen, P.; Yuan, Z.; Agocs, L.; Lesley, G.; Marder, T.
B. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1994, 220, 289-296 and references therein.
(31) This activation likely involves both salt metathesis, exchanging
the iodide of the palladacycle for trifluoroacetate, in addition to
oxidation of the ferrocene to a ferrocenium ion by the Ag(I). For studies
with precatalyst 9a, see ref 6.
(32) Oligimerization of the radical cation intermediate during oxida-
tive dearylation has been observed in similar sterically crowded anilide
systems and may account of the poor mass recovery from these
experiments.29
(33) Anderson, C. E. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California,
Irvine, 2003.
656 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 2, 2005