A R T I C L E S
Scheme 16
Reisman et al.
Scheme 19
extreme conditions (i.e., heating >150 °C), decomposition. For
example, heating ketone 11 in neat pyridine with 100 equiv of
hydroxylamine hydrochloride in a microwave reactor at 100 °C
for 12 h provided only recovered starting material! Attempts to
condense other amine sources documented to be successful with
sterically hindered substrates also failed to provide any detect-
able quantities of product.46 Interestingly, under all conditions
evaluated, there was no evidence of Cl-elimination, suggesting
that the C13-Cl is locked in a pseudo-equatorial position by
the conformationally rigid bicyclic skeleton.
Scheme 17
To determine whether iminium ion formation was occurring,
but disfavored under equilibrium conditions, 11 was subjected
to reductive amination conditions that had been successfully
employed with similar ketones in the synthesis of related
fischerindoles.47 Ketone 11 again failed to produce any amine
product 70 (R ) H). These results suggested that iminium ion
formation was strongly disfavored for ketone 11. Alternatively,
it is conceivable that iminium ion formation occurs, but the
intermediate is too hindered for hydride reduction; however,
the observation that ketone 11 undergoes facile NaBH4 reduction
to a single diastereomer of alcohol 71 suggests this is unlikely
(Scheme 19).
Scheme 18
isonitrile (see, 11 f 1, Scheme 16). Noting that the carbonyl
carbon of 11 and isonitrile-bearing carbon of 1 are in the same
oxidation state, formally the conversion of ketone 11 to vinyl
isonitrile 1 should require condensation with 1 equiv of
formamide (65) and the net loss of 2 equiv of water (Scheme
16). However, in a practical sense this straightforward approach
is limited by the poor nucleophilicity of formamide.
Given that dehydration of vinyl formamides is facile and can
be accomplished under mild conditions,41-43 a variety of routes
to convert ketones to vinyl formamides have been developed
for the purpose of synthesizing vinyl isonitriles. One such
method was developed by Barton et al., wherein a ketone (66)
is first converted to the corresponding oxime (70, Scheme 17),
a transformation which is generally high yielding and applicable
to a variety of substrates.42 Subsequent treatment of the oxime
67 with Ti(OAc)3 in the presence of acetic formic anhydride
(AFA) delivers the enamide (68). Recent advances have shown
that commercially available and inexpensive iron(0) can be used
as the reductant instead of Ti(OAc)3.44,45
Further probing of the general reactivity of ketone 11 revealed
that exposure to a variety of carbon-based nucleophiles (e.g.,
Grignard reagents, organolithiums) also results in the recovery
of starting material. Suspecting that competitive enolization was
responsible for the lack of reactivity, deuterium-trapping experi-
ments were conducted. Indeed, treatment of 11 with vinylmag-
nesium bromide followed by quenching with CD3OD provided
11-C10-D with near quantitative deuterium incorporation.
Recognizing that welwitindolinone A isonitrile (1) contains
10-11
∆
unsaturation, we sought to capitalize on the facile
enolization of ketone 11 by trapping with triflating reagents. In
the event, N-silylation of ketone 11 followed by treatment with
LHMDS cleanly generated the bridgehead lithium enolate (73),
which could be quenched with Comins’ reagent to give vinyl
triflate 74 (Scheme 20).48 With vinyl triflate 74 in hand,
investigations of metal-catalyzed amidation reactions were
undertaken.
In recent years, there have been numerous reports detailing
Pd-catalyzed coupling of vinyl triflates49 and vinyl tosylates50-52
with amides or carbamates to give enamide products. While
the Pd-catalyzed amidations were found to be quite general with
respect to the amide partner, until recently, they had been limited
Initial efforts to convert ketone 11 to 1 focused on application
of the aforementioned Barton sequence. Unfortunately, ketone
11 proved to be remarkably unreactive; all efforts to access
oxime 69 (Scheme 18, R ) OH) using a variety of conditions
simply resulted in the recovery of starting material or, under
(46) For a table of failed conditions for the conversion of 11 to 69 or 70, see
the Supporting Information.
(47) Baran, P. S.; Richter, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7450.
(48) Comins, D. L.; Dehghani, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6299.
(49) Wallace, D. J.; Klauber, D. J.; Chen, C. Y.; Volante, R. P. Org. Lett. 2003,
5, 4749.
(41) Baldwin, J. E.; Oneil, I. A. Synlett 1990, 10, 603.
(42) Barton, D. H. R.; Bowles, T.; Husinec, S.; Forbes, J. E.; Llobera, A.; Porter,
A. E. A.; Zard, S. Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 3343.
(43) Creedon, S. M.; Crowley, H. K.; McCarthy, D. G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 6, 1015.
(44) Burk, M. J.; Casy, G.; Johnson, N. B. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6084.
(45) Yoshida, M.; Watanabe, T.; Ishikawa, T. Heterocycles 2001, 54, 433.
(50) Klapars, A.; Campos, K. R.; Chen, C. Y.; Volante, R. P. Org. Lett. 2005,
7, 1185.
(51) Movassaghi, M.; Ondrus, A. E. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8638.
(52) Willis, M. C.; Brace, G. N.; Holmes, I. P. Synth. Stuttg. 2005, 19, 3229.
9
2094 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 6, 2008