2348
V. Colotta et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14 (2004) 2345–2349
Table 3. Functional antagonism at NMDA and AMPA sites of some
selected quinazoline-2,4-diones
while it increases that towards the AMPA receptor, thus
leading to a nonselective Gly/NMDA versus AMPA
antagonist (compound 4). The lower Gly/NMDA
affinity of 4, with respect to 1, confirms the negative
effect of a 6-substituent bulkier than a chlorine atom
for anchoring to the Gly/NMDA receptor. The 10-fold
increased AMPA affinity of 4, compared to that of 1, is
consistent with the hypothesis of a hydrogen bonding
interaction at the level of the 6-substituent. Neverthe-
less, the profitable effect of the 6-nitro group probably
also arises from its electron-withdrawing properties that
increases the NH acidity, thus reinforcing the hydrogen-
bonding interaction with the receptor proton donor
site.4;11 Reduction of the 6-nitro group of 4 gave the
6-amino derivative 5, which compared to the former,
displays a reduced affinity for both the Gly/NMDA and
AMPA receptor. As regards the binding data of 1–6, at
the high affinity KA receptor, resemble those at the
AMPA receptor, even if their values are from 5- to 30-
fold lower. In particular, compound 6, the most active at
the AMPA receptor, also shows the highest KA affinity,
among the herein reported ligands.
Compound
IC50 (lM)a
NMDA
AMPA
2
42
36
5
4
33
29
4
2
4
6
84 10
4.7 0.9
(*)b
4.6 0.5
52 11
0.20 0.02
DCKA
NBQX
a Concentration necessary for 50% inhibition (IC50) of depolarization
induced by 5 lM S-AMPA or NMDA in mouse cortical wedge
preparation. IC50 values were means SEM of three separate deter-
minations.
b At 10 lM concentration the inhibition was not significant.
NMDA responses in a reversible manner. The electro-
physiological potencies of compounds 4 and 6 closely
correlate with their binding affinities at the Gly/NMDA
and AMPA receptors. In fact, 4 shows similar potencies
in the Gly/NMDA and AMPA functional assays while
the inhibitory action of 6 on depolarization induced by
AMPA was higher than that on NMDA-evoked
response. On the contrary, the functional antagonist
activity of compound 2 versus NMDA receptor is not in
agreement with the [3H]glycine binding result since 2
shows about 50-fold higher affinity on the Gly/NMDA
site than on AMPA receptor, while, it appears equipo-
tent in inhibiting NMDA- and AMPA-evoked
responses.
In order to assess the functional antagonism at the
NMDA receptor–ion channel complex, we tested
derivatives 1–6 for their ability to inhibit the binding
of the channel blocking agent [3H]-(þ)-MK-801((þ)-
5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-benzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-
imine)10;19;20 in rat cortical membranes incubated with
10 lM glutamate and 0.1 lM glycine. The results ob-
tained are listed in Table 2. In general, the IC50 values of
these derivatives closely correlate with their Ki values on
[3H]glycine binding, the only exception being compound
1, which, in this assay, results about 6-fold less active
than derivatives 2 and 3, which both show binding
activity similar to 1.
In conclusion, the herein reported preliminary study has
identified the 3-hydroxy-quinazoline-2,4-dione as a new
scaffold to obtain selective Gly/NMDA and AMPA
receptor antagonists. In fact, introduction of suitable
substituents on the benzofused moiety have led to either
Gly/NMDA or AMPA selective antagonists. Moreover,
this work has confirmed some different structural
requirements of the Gly/NMDA and AMPA receptors.
Taking into account these findings, further modifica-
tions of these derivatives, to improve both affinity and
selectivity, are in progress.
The selected 3-hydroxy-quinazoline-2,4-dione deriva-
tives 2, 4, 6, together with NBQX (2,3-dihydroxy-6-
nitro-7-sulphamoylbenzo[f]quinoxaline) and DCKA
(5,7-dichlorokynurenic acid), as reference compounds,
were evaluated for functional antagonist activity by
assessing their ability to inhibit depolarization induced
by 5 lM AMPA or NMDA in mouse cortical wedge
preparations21 (Table 3). The electrophysiological assays
were performed following the procedures described in
Ref. 12. All the tested compounds inhibited AMPA and
References and notes
€
1 . Baruner-Osborne, H.; Egebjerg, J.; Nielsen, E. Ø.; Mad-
sen, U.; Krogsgaard-Larsen, P. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43,
2609.
2. Dingledine, R.; Borges, K.; Bowie, D.; Traynelis, S. F.
Pharmacol. Rev. 1999, 51, 7.
3. Johnson, J. W.; Ascher, P. Nature 1987, 325, 529.
4. Bigge, C. F.; Nikam, S. S. Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents 1997,
7, 1099.
5. Jansen, M.; Dannhardt, G. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 38,
661.
6. LoGrasso, P.; McKelvy, J. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003,
7, 452.
7. Colotta, V.; Catarzi, D.; Varano, F.; Cecchi, L.; Filacchi-
oni, G.; Galli, A.; Costagli, C. Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med.
Chem. 1997, 330, 129.
Table 2. Inhibition of stimulated [3H]-(þ)-MK-801binding
Compound
IC50 (lM)a or I%b
1
2
3
4
5
6
4.8 0.7
0.75 0.08
0.43 0.1
1.7 0.01
89
29%
9
a Concentration giving 50% inhibition of stimulated [3H]-(þ)-MK-801
binding. All assays were carried out in the presence of 10 lM gluta-
mate and 0.1 lM glycine. IC50 values were means SEM of three or
four separate determinations in triplicate.
b Percentage of inhibition (I%) of specific binding at 100 lM concen-
tration.
8. Catarzi, D.; Colotta, V.; Varano, F.; Cecchi, L.; Filacchi-
oni, G.; Galli, A.; Costagli, C. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 2478.