Angewandte
Chemie
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200903923
Hydroxylation
Synthesis of Phenol, Aromatic Ether, and Benzofuran Derivatives by
Copper-Catalyzed Hydroxylation of Aryl Halides**
Dongbing Zhao, Ningjie Wu, Shuai Zhang, Peihua Xi, Xiaoyu Su, Jingbo Lan, and
Jingsong You*
Phenols are not only important building blocks for construct-
ing pharmaceuticals, polymers, and natural compounds, but
also serve as versatile synthetic intermediates in preparing
oxygenated heterocycles.[1] The classical non-oxidative prep-
arative routes of these compounds include transformation of
diazoarenes in the presence of a copper complex as well as
nucleophilic substitution of activated aryl halides and ben-
zyne. However, these methods generally suffer from limita-
tions with regard to substrate generality, the availability of
starting materials, and sometimes the harsh reaction condi-
tions.[2] A milder method of the preparation of non-ortho-
model substrate in the presence of copper(I) iodide (Table 1).
As KOH was used as the nucleophile, initial reaction screen-
ing led to disappointing results in the absence of a ligand
(Table 1, entry 1). We subsequently screened a variety of
ligands, solvents, and bases. 1,10-Phenanthroline proved to be
an excellent ligand (Table 1, entries 2–6), and the mixed
DMSO/H2O (1:1) solvent system was clearly the best choice
(Table 1, entries 6–10). When the base was altered to
potassium carbonate, cesium carbonate, or potassium phos-
phinate, only poor yields were obtained (Table 1, entries 11–
13). In addition, other sources of the copper salt were inferior
to CuI (compare Table 1, entry 6 to entries 14–17). Although
not yet investigated in detail, the hydroxylation of
p-iodotoluene could occur in 38% yield even with a
substantially low CuI loading of 0.1 mol% (Table 1, entry 20).
With the optimized conditions now determined, a variety
of substituted aryl halides were examined and the results are
summarized in Table 2. Gratifyingly, various phenol deriva-
tives were obtained with both non-activated and activated
À
substituted phenols has been achieved in two steps: C H
activation/borylation and oxidation in the presence of iridium
phosphine complexes.[3]
In contrast to well-established palladium- or copper-
catalyzed formation of aryl ethers,[4,5] the direct hydroxylation
of aryl halides has proved to be challenge in coupling
chemistry. Recently, several palladium-catalyzed processes
have allowed the cross-coupling of aryl halides with hydrox-
ide salts to proceed under relatively mild reaction condi-
tions.[6,7] Although the economic attractiveness of copper has
led to remarkable progress in the development of copper-
catalyzed coupling reactions,[8] the copper-mediated hydrox-
ylation of aryl halides with hydroxide salts (e.g., KOH and
NaOH) as nucleophiles to directly form phenols under mild
conditions is less developed.[9] Drawing from recent experi-
ences in the field of copper-catalyzed cross-coupling reac-
tions,[10] we herein disclose that aryl halides can directly
couple with potassium hydroxide under mild reaction con-
ditions, namely in the presence of CuI and 1,10-phenanthro-
line (phen)—which is inexpensive and commercially avail-
able. The process constitutes a practical, general, and efficient
method for the synthesis of phenols.
Table 1: Optimization of the hydroxylation of p-iodotoluene.[a]
Entry Ligand
Solvent (1:1)
Base
[Cu]
Yield [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
–
DMSO/H2O
DMSO/H2O
DMSO/H2O
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
CuI
45
76
66
86
89
Hacac
l-Pro
TMEDA DMSO/H2O
DMEDA DMSO/H2O
phen
phen
phen
phen
phen
phen
phen
phen
phen
phen
phen
phen
phen
phen
phen
DMSO/H2O
DMSO
H2O
DMF/H2O
1,4-dioxane/H2O KOH
DMSO/H2O
DMSO/H2O
DMSO/H2O
DMSO/H2O
DMSO/H2O
DMSO/H2O
DMSO/H2O
DMSO/H2O
DMSO/H2O
DMSO/H2O
96
<10
n.r.
n.r.
35
16
25
20
48
52
92
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18[c]
19[d]
20[e]
It was determined during a preliminary survey of the
reaction conditions that we should use p-iodotoluene as the
K2CO3
Cs2CO3 CuI
K3PO4
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
KOH
CuI
CuSO4
Cu(OAc)2
CuCl
Cu(acac)2
CuI
[*] D. Zhao, N. Wu, S. Zhang, P. Xi, Dr. X. Su, Prof. Dr. J. Lan,
Prof. Dr. J. You
Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Technology of Ministry of
Education, College of Chemistry and State Key Laboratory of
Biotherapy, West China Medical School, Sichuan University
29 Wangjiang Road, Chengdu 610064 (China)
Fax: (+86)28-8541-2203
87
84
85
38
CuI
CuI
E-mail: jsyou@scu.edu.cn
[a] Reactions were carried out using CuI (10 mol%), base (3.0 equiv),
ligand (20 mol%), and p-iodotoluene (1 mmol) in a 1.25m solution at
1008C for 24 h. [b] Yield of isolated product. [c] Reaction was carried out
for 15 h. [d] CuI (5 mol%). [e] CuI (0.1 mol%). DMEDA=N,N’-dime-
thylethanediamine, DMF=N,N-dimethylformamide, DMSO=dimethyl
sulfoxide, Hacac=acetylacetone, l-Pro=l-proline, n.r. =no reaction,
TMEDA=N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethanediamine.
[**] This work was supported by grants from the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (grant nos 20772086, 20872101, and
20702035). We also thank the Center of Testing and Analysis,
Sichuan University for NMR measurements.
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8729 –8732
ꢀ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
8729