G. Vanhoyland et al. / Thermochimica Acta 354 (2000) 145±151
151
ate phase such as La2(CO3)3 could be identi®ed. This
6. Conclusions
was de®nitely not possible with HT-DRIFT and HT-
XRD due to the discontinuous measuring regime.
However, the existence of the La2(CO3)3 as an inter-
mediate phase is also suggested by the coupled TG-
FTIR experiment, since in the whole experiment only
once CO is evolved. This means that all the oxalate
groups have to decompose to carbonate groups in one
single step. In the coupled TG-FTIR experiment (con-
tinuous heating rate) CO2 is detected at the same time
due to the decomposition of the carbonate to an
oxycarbonate, since both decomposition reactions
are not enough resolved in time.
From the HT-DRIFT experiments, it's evident that
in fact two different oxycarbonates must exist. First of
all La2O2(CO3), which was also identi®ed from HT-
XRD, in the temperature range 530±6008C. However,
from the curve integration, it follows that in the region
470±5008C, the La2O(CO3)2 is uniquely present. In
between, it's probably a mixture which exists.
These remarks in mind, we can summarise the
whole decomposition mechanism:
The decomposition mechanism of La2(C2O4)3Á10-
H2O is rather complicated by the fact that some
decomposition reactions overlap with each other, so
not all the intermediate products can be identi®ed from
the conventional TGA curve. Hi-Res TGA, however,
has a much better resolving power. Moreover, the
intermediate products can be identi®ed in other ways:
indirectly from the evolved gas analysis (TG-FTIR) or
directly by other techniques as HT-DRIFT and HT-
XRD. As has been showed in this case, combining all
the information obtained from the different techniques
is an ef®cient way in solving the puzzle.
Acknowledgements
G. Vanhoyland is research assistant of the Fund for
Scienti®c Research, Flanders (Belgium) (F.W.O).
M.K. Van Bael is postdoctoral fellow of the
Fund for Scienti®c Research, Flanders (Belgium)
(F.W.O.).
La2ꢀC2O4 Á 10H2O ! La2ꢀC2O4
3
3 Á 3H2O 7H2O
(1a)
References
La2ꢀC2O43 Á 3H2O ! La2ꢀC2O4 3H2O
Â
[1] A. Gorski, A.D. Krasnicka, J. Therm. Anal. 32 (1987) 1229±
3
1241.
[2] W. Ma-Shine, F. Tsang-Tse, Mater. Chem. Phys. 37 (1994)
278±283.
(1b)
La2ꢀC2O4 ! La2ꢀCO3 3CO
(2a)
(2b)
(3)
3
3
[3] R.L.N. Sastry, S.R. Yoganarasimhan, P.N. Mehrotra, C.N.R.
Rao, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 28 (1966) 1165.
[4] J. Mullens, in: M. Brown, P. Gallagher (Ed.), Handbook of
Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, Vol. 1, Elsevier, Am-
sterdam, 1998 p. 509.
La2ꢀCO3 ! La2OꢀCO3 CO2
3
2
La2OꢀCO3 ! La2O2ꢀCO3 CO2
2
La2O2ꢀCO3 ! La2O3 CO2
(4)
[5] J. Mullens, A. Vos, R. Carleer, J. Yperman, L.C. Van Poucke,
Thermochim. Acta 207 (1992) 337.
However, since reactions 2a and 2b are highly
exothermic, due to local heat build-up also reaction
3 can occur at the same time. In fact, this is clearly a
mass effect and depending on the technique used. HT-
XRD samples for example are about 50 times larger
than those for HT-DRIFTand Hi-Res TGA. Moreover,
in the HT-DRIFT set-up the sample is embedded in an
inert material (KBr). This yields a more ef®cient heat
removal compared to HT-XRD. For this reason
La2O2(CO3) is partly formed when the oxalate decom-
poses in the HT-XRD experiment.
[6] A. Vos, R. Carleer, J. Mullens, J. Yperman, L.C. Van Poucke,
Eur. J. Solid State Inorg. Chem. 28 (1991) 657±662.
[7] P.E. Werner, L. Eriksson, M. Westdahl, J. Appl. Cryst. 18
(1985) 367±370, Treor97 is a further evolution of the well-
known Treor90 indexing program.
È
[8] A. Boultif, D. Louer, J. Appl. Cryst. 24 (1991) 987±993.
[9] N.B. Colthup, L.H. Daly, S.E. Wiberley, in: Introduction to
Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy, 3rd Edition, Academic
Press, New York, 1990, p. 318.
[10] N.B. Colthup, L.H. Daly, S.E. Wiberley, in: Introduction to
Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy, 3rd Edition, Academic
Press, New York, 1990, p. 310.