3048
P. Liu et al. / Polyhedron 25 (2006) 3045–3052
Table 3
4 moles of CH3NH2, C2H5NH2 and n-C3H7NH2, 3 moles
of i-C3H7NH2, n-C4H9NH2, i-C4H9NH2 and t-C4H9NH2,
and form stable coordination compounds.
Crystallographic data for [Cd(n-C3H7NH2)4(H2O)2](p-H2NC6H4SO3)2
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
C24H52CdN6O8S2
729.24
293(2)
0.71073
triclinic
It is noted that the reaction process of [Cu(1,5-
nds)(H2O)4]n (I) with amine was accompanied by a color
change, depending on the different amine molecules that
the reactant was exposed to. With CH3NH2 and i-C3H7-
NH2, the color changed from light blue to purple; with
C2H5NH2, n-C3H7NH2, n-C4H9NH2 and i-C4H9NH2, the
light blue deepened; with t-C4H9NH2, the color became
brown.
[Cd(l2-N,O-p-NH2C6H4SO3)2(H2O)2] is a layered coor-
dination compound with a 2D structure [3]. It can react
with amine vapors and produce mono-amine coordinated
complexes. [Cd(p-NH2C6H4SO3)2] (III) was obtained by
dehydrating [Cd(l2-N,O-p-NH2C6H4SO3)2(H2O)2] and is
also a crystalline material. [Cd(p-NH2C6H4SO3)2] (III)
can uptake 3 moles of CH3NH2, 4 moles of C2H5NH2, n-
C3H7NH2 and n-C4H9NH2, and 1 mole of i-C3H7NH2. It
is interesting to note that III has a much stronger amine-
intercalation property for amines with a longer chain than
that of [Cd(l2-N,O-p-NH2C6H4SO3)2(H2O)2]. [Cd(p-NH2-
C6H4SO3)2] (III) can uptake 4 moles of n-C4H9NH2, while
its hydrated form can only uptake 1 mole of n-C4H9NH2.
This observation can be explained by the result that dehy-
dration creates vacant reaction sites in Cd(II) that are more
accessible for amines with longer carbon chains.
˚
Wavelength (A)
Crystal system
Space group
Unit cell dimensions
ꢀ
P1
˚
a (A)
8.093(3)
9.907(3)
11.212(4)
76.573(5)
78.813(5)
83.288(5)
855.4(5)
1
1.416
0.810
382
0.48 · 0.45 · 0.42
2.12–27.00
˚
b (A)
˚
c (A)
a (ꢁ)
b (ꢁ)
c (ꢁ)
3
˚
Volume (A )
Z
Dcalc (Mg/m3)
Absorption coefficient (mmÀ1
F(000)
)
Crystal size (mm)
h Range for data collection (ꢁ)
Limiting indices
À10 6 h 6 10,
À12 6 k 6 12,
À14 6 l 6 13
7288/3665 [0.0163]
97.8
Reflections collected/unique [Rint
Completeness to h = 27.00 (%)
Absorption correction
Maximum and minimum transmission
Refinement method
]
empirical
0.7272 and 0.6971
full-matrix least-squares on F2
3665/3/192
1.079
Data/restraints/parameters
Goodness-of-fit on F2
Final R indices [I > 2r(I)]
R indices (all data)
Largest different peak and hole (e A
R1 = 0.0222, wR2 = 0.0591
R1 = 0.0240, wR2 = 0.0605
0.259 and À0.352
All complexes release amine molecules at temperatures
higher than 50 ꢁC, after the boiling points of the free amine
molecules, indicating the coordinative nature of the amine
ligands to the metal centers. Considering the compatible
coordination strength of H2O and –SO3, whether the water
molecules or the sulfonate groups occupy the spare coordi-
nation sites of the metal centers is not clear.
À3
˚
)
Absorption corrections were applied by SADABS [8]. The
structure was solved by direct methods and refined using
full-matrix least-squares/difference Fourier techniques by
SHELXTL [9]. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with
anisotropic displacement parameters. After that, all hydro-
gen atoms of the ligands were placed in idealized positions
and refined as riding atoms with the relative isotropic
parameters. Crystal data are listed in Table 3.
There are strong peaks around 3150–3350 cmÀ1 in the
IR spectra of all the amine complexes, corresponding to
the stretching bands of the coordinated N–H groups. There
are alkyl C–H stretching bands observed around 2900–
3000 cmÀ1 that are contributed by the alkyl amines, con-
firming the existence of the adducted amine molecules.
The broad bands around 3500 cmÀ1 are contributed by
the O–H stretching of the water molecules.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Syntheses and characterization
All the amine-coordinated complexes obtained via the
solid–vapor reactions are crystalline materials, similar to
that observed in the Cd(II) analogs [2,3]. The C2H5NH2
and n-C3H7NH2 products of [Cd(p-NH2C6H4SO3)2] (III)
grow into single crystals in situ in the solid–vapor reac-
tion, which makes direct structure characterization
possible.
[Cu(1,5-nds)(H2O)4]n (I) and [Cu(H2O)6](1,5-nds) (II)
were obtained via the reaction between CuCl2 and 1,5-
naphthalenedisulfonate acid (1,5-nds) in aqueous media
at different temperatures [7]. In I, Cu(II) is coordinated
by the sulfonate group as well as by 4 water molecules,
while one –SO3 group coordinates as a g2 l2 ligand to
two different [Cu(H2O)4]+ ions in syn/anti fashion, result-
ing in a one-dimensional structure, as shown in Fig. 3. In
II, Cu(II) is coordinated by 6 water molecules and the sul-
fonate is the counter anion. They show different reactivity
toward amine vapors, with II being more reactive than I.
However, they produce the same final amine-coordinated
complexes. Both complexes can quantitatively take up to
3.2. Reaction selectivity and preference
[Cu(1,5-nds)(H2O)4] (I) and [Cu(H2O)6](1,5-nds) (II) do
not react with (C2H5)3N and PhNH2. [Cd(p-NH2C6H4-
SO3)2] (III) does not react with NH2CH2CH2NH2,
(C2H5)2NH and PhNH2.In order to reveal the reaction
preferences toward different amines, the absorption exper-