Angewandte
Research Articles
Chemie
Information, Table S1). The more nucleophilic PBu3 was
Because conditions A worked well for the preparation of
superior to PPh3 at accelerating the Michael reaction, while
nonpolar solvents were preferred over polar ones, delivering
the Michael adduct in 96% yield. Next, we examined the
Heck reaction using the optimized conditions for the Michael
addition (Supporting Information, Table S2). A screen of
various bases revealed that Et3N containing 1% water was
optimal (Supporting Information, Table S3).[21] Toluene and
MeCN were superior to dioxane as solvents, and PdII catalysts
outperformed Pd0 species. The presence of the phase-transfer
agent tetrabutylammonium chloride (TBAC) was essential.[22]
Thus, the use of non-anhydrous Et3N and catalytic Pd(OAc)2
in MeCN provided the furan 3m in 97% yield [Eq. (1)].
furans containing at least one electron-withdrawing group, we
attempted to make the Michael acceptor more electron-
deficient (Supporting Information, Scheme S5), but detected
no product and obtained copious amounts of polymerized
Michael acceptor.[17c] Intrigued by Fuꢀs report on the use of
air-stable trialkylphosphonium salts for various cross-cou-
plings of deactivated aryl chlorides and bromides,[24] we
adapted those conditions for our Michael–Heck reaction
[Eq. (2)].
Using P(t-Bu)3HBF4 along with Cy2NMe as the base, we
prepared trialkyl furans with fused cycloalkyl (3z) and linear
alkyl (3cc, 3dd, 3ee, 3hh) substituents in moderate to good
yields. Plakorsin D methyl ester,[7] a polyketide isolated from
the marine sponge P. simplex, was obtained in 64% yield.
Significantly, the medicinally relevant CF3 group was com-
patible, furnishing the furan 3aa in good yield.[25,26] While
these conditions failed for the synthesis of tetraalkyl furans,
a slight increase in the reaction temperature to 1108C (from
908C for conditions B) and the use of Pd2(dba)3 as a catalyst
enabled the preparation of tetraalkyl furans in good yields
[Eq. (3)].
With these optimized conditions in hand, we explored the
substrate scope of the Michael–Heck reaction (Table 1).
Under conditions A, we obtained the 2-substituted furan 3a
in 94% yield. These conditions were also compatible with
both C3-alkyl and -aryl groups, delivering the 2,3-disubsti-
tuted furans 3a–3k in good yields (53–90%). Elevated
temperatures were required in the cases of the bulky 3-
isopropyl- and 3-tert-butyl-substituted furans 3c and 3d
(conditions A1). Notably, potentially reactive allyl and prenyl
groups were inert to the Heck conditions, delivering 3e and
3 f, respectively, in good yields. While both electron-donating
and -withdrawing substituents on the C3-phenyl ring were
tolerated, the reaction was sensitive to steric effects, with meta
substituents (3j, 3k) giving substantially lower yields than
para (3h, 3i) ones. A similar trend occurred among the 2,4-
disubstituted furans, where C2-phenyl compounds containing
para electron-withdrawing (3o) and -donating (3p) groups
outperformed an ortho-substituted one (3n). While both C4-
alkyl (3l) and -aryl (3m) groups were compatible, the use of 3-
butyn-2-one (3l’, 3m’) and ethynyl phenyl ketone (3m’’) in
place of methyl propiolate required slow addition of the
alkyne (conditions A2) to prevent rapid polymerization of the
Michael acceptor under phosphine catalysis. The ease with
which the starting (Z)-3-halo-2-propen-1-ol could be func-
tionalized enabled facile access to both 2,3- and 2,4-function-
alized furans, which are difficult to obtain regioselectively
when using conventional methods.[23] The standard conditions
A were also applicable for the synthesis of 2,5-disubstituted
furans, where C5-alkyl (3q, 3r), -cycloalkyl (3s, 3t), and -aryl
(3v–3x) groups were all incorporated. No opening of the
cyclopropyl ring (3s) occurred, and both bulky cyclohexyl
(3t) and 1-naphthyl (3x) groups were compatible. Plakorsi-
n A,[8a] an F-acid derivative from the marine sponge P.
simplex, was obtained in 86% yield.
Whereas the presence of a C3-aryl unit led to a slightly
diminished yield (3ii), tetraalkyl furans with either fused
cycloalkyl (3kk) or linear alkyl (3jj, 3ll) groups were
prepared in good yields. In the cases of 3z and 3kk, we used
a vinyl bromide substrate, further highlighting the versatility
of this method. Finally, furans substituted with four different
alkyl groups (3mm, 3nn) could be prepared in good yields. To
the best of your knowledge, this methodology is the first ever
reported of result in the synthesis of furans bearing four
different alkyl substituents. Among the more than 90 reports
describing the syntheses of tetrasubstituted furans, only three
have been amenable to the preparation of tetraalkyl furans,[14]
and none of them to the synthesis of furans presenting four
different alkyl groups. The compatibility of silyl ether groups
is also significant, suggesting potential application of this
method towards total synthesis of complex furan natural
products.
We turned our attention to the preparation of tri- and
tetrasubstituted furans. While conditions A1 delivered the
aryl-containing trisubstituted furans 3y, 3bb, and 3gg in good
yields, they failed for di- or trialkyl-substituted substrates.
Having demonstrated the wide substrate scope of the
Michael–Heck reaction, we explored its applications in the
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 8874 –8881
ꢀ 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH
8875