6, 11-14). The successful use of o-chlorotoluene, in
particular, is noteworthy, since it is both electron-rich and
sterically encumbered. Aryl halides possessing an electron-
withdrawing group at the para position gave the respective
arylated products in good yields (entries 7-10). By com-
parison, o-nitro-substituted aryl halides (Cl, Br, I) were poor
arylating agents, and only o-chloronitrobenzene gave any of
the arylation product (entry 15). Some of the above arylations
were also carried out successfully in toluene at 80 °C instead
of refluxing benzene.
palladium enolate intermediates do not equilibrate to the
regioisomeric, less-hindered enolates. Norbornanone-derived
enol ether 6 reacted slowly with p-iodoanisole to produce
the expected arylation product (7) in 58% yield together with
recovered p-iodoanisole (entry 2). Also slow to react was
the acyclic enol ether 8.8 This reaction was carried out in
refluxing benzene, using p-bromoanisole as the arylating
agent, and examination of the reaction mixture by 1H NMR
after 9 h showed the presence of primarily unreacted 8. In
refluxing toluene, however, this arylation proceeded well and
afforded 9 in 70% yield (entry 3). When this reaction was
carried out with p-iodoanisole, it proceeded in low yield and
produced unindentified byproducts. A competition experi-
ment (eq 4) showed that the aryl iodide is consumed faster
To explore the generality of the arylation protocol,
additional TMS enol ethers were prepared and subjected to
standard arylation protocol (Table 2).16 Entry 1 highlights
Table 2. Intermolecular Pd-Catalyzed Arylation of Different
TMS Enol Ether Substratesa
than the bromide, consistent with the expected relative rates
of oxidative addition of Pd0 to aryl halides. These observa-
tions indicate that oxidative addition of Pd0 onto the aryl
halide is not the rate determining step in the reaction and
suggest that the Pd-intermediate formed from the aryl iodide
is less competent, due to either poor reactivity or stability,
than that from the aryl bromide at proceeding to the product.
(15) For early reports on Pd-catalyzed alkenylation of enolates, see: (a)
Piers, E.; Marais, P. C. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3454-3455. (b) Piers, E.;
Renaud, J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 11-13. See also: (c) Yu, J. M.; Wang,
T.; Liu, X. X.; Deschamps, J.; Flippen-Anderson, J.; Liao, X. B.; Cook, J.
M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7565-7581 and references cited therein. (d)
Sole, D.; Urbaneja, X.; Bonjoch, J. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1646-
1650 and references cited therein. (e) Chieffi, A.; Kamikawa, K.; Ahman,
J.; Fox, J. M.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1897-1900.
(16) (a) Heathcock, C. H. Mod. Synth. Methods 1992, 6, 1-102. (b)
Kobayashi, S.; Manabe, K.; Ishitani, H.; Matsuo, J. I. In Science of Synthesis;
Bellus, D., et al., Eds.; Georg Thieme: Stuttgart, Germany, 2002; Vol. 9,
pp 317-369.
(17) (a) Nishiyama, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Koie, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 617-620. (b) Nishiyama, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Koie, Y. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 2367-2370. (c) Littke, A. F.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1998, 37, 3387-3388. (d) Shaughnessy, K. H.; Kim, P.; Hartwig, J. F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2123-2132. See also ref 13g.
(18) This combination was selected as it was expected to be a challenging
arylation, since not only is the phenylation cyclohexanone reported to be
low yielding (ref 8), but the oxidative addition to the electron-rich
p-iodoanisole was expected to be slow.
(19) An extensive screening of reaction conditions was carried out. Pd
sources examined: PdCl2(Ph3P)2, PdCl2(o-Tol3P)2, PdCl2, Pd2(dba)3, Pd(OAc)2,
or PtCl2(PhCN)2. Phosphine ligands: BINAP, Tol-BINAP, t- Bu3P,
(t-BuCH2)3P, 2-(di-tert-butylphosphino)biphenyl, cHex3P, Ph3P, (o-Tol)3As,
Ph3As, and (i-PrO)3P. Fluoride sources: Bu3SnF, LiF, NaF, CsF, CuF2,
ZnF2, ZrF4, KF, ZnCl2, SnCl4, or Me4NF. Solvents: benzene, toluene, DMF,
or THF. Additives: LiCl, NaOAc and t-BuOK.
a Reactions were conducted with 1 equiv of the aryl halide (0.25 M), 2
equiv of TMS-enol ether, 2.5 mol % of Pd2(dba)3, 6 mol % of t-Bu3P, 2
equiv of Bu3SnF, PhH, reflux.
an important feature of the silyl enol ether arylation
method: arylations take place regiospecifically. Thus, aryl-
ation of enol ether 4, prepared easily and regiospecifically
by methylcuprate addition to 2-cyclohexenone,22 with p-
iodoanisole gave arylated product 5 as a single regio- and
stereoisomer in 72% yield.23 Evidently, the putative tin and
(13) For the Pd-catalyzed intermolecular arylation of carbonyl com-
pounds, see: (a) Palucki, M.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 11108-11109. (b) Hamann, B. C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 12382-12383. (c) Kawatsura, M; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 1473-1478. (d) Fox, J. M.; Huang, X.; Chieffi, A.;
Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1360-1370. (e) Ehrentraut,
A.; Zapf, A.; Beller, M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2002, 344, 209-217. (f) Marion,
N.; Ecarnot, E. C.; Navarro, O.; Amoroso, D.; Bell, A.; Nolan, S. P. J.
Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3816-3821 and references cited therein. (g)
Review: Culkin, D. A.; Hartwig, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 234-
245.
(14) Intramolecular R-arylation of enolates: (a) Muratake, H.; Natsume,
M.; Nakai, H. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 11783-11803 and references cited
therein. (b) Shaughnessy, K. H.; Hamann, B. C.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Org.
Chem. 1998, 63, 6546-6553. (c) Sole, D.; Vallverdu, L.; Solans, X.; Font-
Bardia, M.; Bonjoch, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1587-1594. (d)
Honda, T.; Sakamaki, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6823-6825. (e)
Reference 5d.
(20) General procedure for Pd-catalyzed arylation: A mixture containing
TMS enol ether (1 mmol), aryl halide (0.5 mmol), 2.5 mol % of Pd2(dba)3
(11.4 mg), and Bu3SnF (309 mg, 1 mmol) under a nitrogen atmosphere
t
was treated with a solution of Bu3P (7.5 µL) in benzene (2 mL) at room
temperature. The resulting mixture was heated to reflux. After cooling to
room temperature, the reaction mixture was diluted with ether (20 mL)
(when the precipitate of tin residue was formed, it was removed by
decantation with ether), washed with 1 N aqueous NaOH twice (5 mL each)
followed by brine (2 × 5 mL), dried (MgSO4), and concentrated. The residue
was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 25, 2006
5727