Brief Articles
J ournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2004, Vol. 47, No. 14 3695
Ta ble 2. Antibacterial Activity of Selected Pyrazole
Ta ble 3. Inhibitory Effects of Selected Pyrazole Derivatives
Derivatives against Susceptible and Resistant Strains
against DNA Gyrase and Topoisomerase IV
MIC (µg/mL)
IC50 (µg/mL)
organisma
1
12 16
SPFX
NB
1
12
16
SPFX
NB
0.25
28
0.25
3.5
>400
S. aureus FDA 209Pb
S. aureus KMP9 (MRSA)c
S. aureus RN4220b
64
64
64
64
64
4
4
8
8
8
8
8
8
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
0.125 0.25
128
0.125 0.125
0.125
0.125 0.5
4
0.25
32
S. aureus DNA gyrasea
S. aureus DNA Topo IVb
E. coli DNA gyrasea
128 32
128 32
>128 32
128 32
14
14
14
14
14
0.25
6.9
>400
0.25
S. aureus N175d
4
E. coli DNA Topo IVb
human DNA Topo IIc
8.0
S. pneumoniae ATCC49619b
200 50 >400
S. pneumoniae KT2524 (PRSP)c 64
0.5
2
2
a
b
DNA gyrase supercoiling activity. Topoisomerase IV decat-
enation activity. c Topoisomerase II relaxation activity.
E. faecalis ATCC29212b
64
64
E. faecalis KU1777 (VRE)e
a
(SPFX: sparfloxacin, CAM: clarithromycin, ABPC: ampicillin,
antibacterial activity against sensitive and resistant
Gram-positive bacteria with across-the-board MIC val-
ues of 1-2 µg/mL. Thus, it is suggested that the pyrazole
derivatives have potent antibacterial activity against
susceptible and quinolone- and coumarin-resistant Gram-
positive bacteria.
VCM: vancomycin). Susceptible strain. c SPFX-, CAM-, and
b
d
ABPC-resistant strain. S. aureus N175 (GyrB, R144I) was
derived from RN4220 with selection of novobiocin. e SPFX- and
VCM-resistant strain.
gen (1) or a methyl (11), ended in less potent antibac-
terial activity.
Next, the inhibitory activity of the selected compounds
1, 12, and 16 against DNA gyrase and topoisomerase
IV was examined. As shown in Table 3, 12 and 16
having potent antibacterial activity strongly inhibited
DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV isolated from S.
aureus and E. coli. The SAR for this inhibition was
almost parallel to that for the antibacterial activity
mentioned above. In addition, MIC values for both
compounds correlated well with IC50 values especially
in Gram-positive microoraganisms (Tables 2 and 3),
indicating that inhibition of topoisomerases by pyrazole
derivatives causes bacterial cell growth inhibition.
Moreover, 16 did not inhibit human topoisomerase II
even at 400 µg/mL. This result indicates that 16, like
sparfloxacin and novobiocin, selectively inhibits bacte-
rial topoisomerase.
In summary, we have described the synthesis and
structure-activity relationships of new pyrazole ana-
logues. The 5-[(E)-2-(5-chloroindol-3-yl)vinyl]pyrazole
16, one of the most active compounds, showed potent
antibacterial activity against not only susceptible strains
but also multidrug-resistant strains. In addition, 16
showed a more potent antibacterial activity against
clinically isolated quinolone- and coumarin-resistant
Gram-positive bacteria than sparfloxacin and novobio-
cin, respectively. We are pursuing further modifications
of this novel pyrazole scaffold that can potently inhibit
DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV.
As for the 5- and 3-vinyl derivatives (15, 16, 18), the
MIC values of the 5-[(E)-2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)vinyl]-
pyrazole 15 against the four strains of bacteria studied
were almost similar to those of 13 or 14. However, the
5-[(E)-2-(5-chloroindol-3-yl)vinyl]pyrazole 16, having a
3-chlorophenyl moiety, showed more potent antibacte-
rial activity than 15. Although 18 had 8-fold more potent
antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli K901
than the parent compound 1, its antibacterial activity
against E. coli NIHJ J C-2 was similar to that of 1. From
the MIC values of 8 and 13, and those of 10 and 15
against E. coli NIHJ J C-2 and E. coli K901, it seems
that the 1-(3-chlorophenyl)pyrazoles 13 and 15 were
pumped out of the bacteria by a bacterial outer mem-
brane pump. However, because 16 showed the most
potent antibacterial activity against the four strains of
bacteria, it is believed that this compound was not
affected by the bacterial outer membrane pump and that
it penetrated well through the bacterial membrane. The
5-[(E)-2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)vinyl]pyrazole 15 showed
slightly more potent antibacterial activity than the
3-[(E)-2-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)vinyl]pyrazole 18. Although
most of the synthesized pyrazole derivatives revealed
potent antibacterial activity against not only S. aureus
FDA 209P but also S. aureus KMP9, 16 exhibited the
most potent antibacterial activity among all the com-
pounds synthesized in this study.
To examine whether the pyrazole derivatives are
effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bac-
teria, MIC values of the selected pyrazole derivatives
1, 12, and 16 were determined against quinolone-
resistant clinical isolates and coumarin-resistant labo-
ratory isolates of Gram-positive organisms and were
compared with those of sparfloxacin and novobiocin.9
As shown in Table 2, MIC values of sparfloxacin against
MSSA, PSSP, and VSE were 0.125, 0.125, and 0.25 µg/
mL, respectively, and those against MRSA, PRSP, and
VRE were 128, 4, and 32 µg/mL, respectively. On the
other hand, 1, 12, and 16 revealed the same antibacte-
rial activity against sensitive and multidrug resistant
Gram-positive bacteria. MIC values of novobiocin against
S. aureus RN4220 and S. aureus N175 derived from
RN4220 were 0.125 and 4 µg/mL, respectively. On the
other hand, 1, 12, and 16 showed the same antibacterial
activity against sensitive and coumarin-resistant S.
aureus. Compound 16 demonstrated the most potent
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l P r oced u r es for Syn th esis of th e 3- a n d 5-(4-
P ip er id yl)p yr a zole Der iva tives. Meth od s A a n d B. (a) To
an EtOH (30 mL) solution of 1,3-diketones 3 (10 mmol) was
added hydrazine hydrate (20 mmol) or monosubstituted hy-
drazine (20 mmol), and the reaction mixture was refluxed for
12 h. To this reaction mixture was added 10% citric acid (30
mL), and the resulting solution was taken up in AcOEt (100
mL), washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine, dried
over MgSO4, and filtered. The residue was purified by column
chromatography (silica gel, CHCl3-MeOH) to give 1-unsub-
stituted 3-[4-(1-tert-butyloxycarbonyl)piperidyl]pyrazoles 4 or
a mixture of 1-substituted 3-[4-(1-tert-butyloxycarbonyl)pip-
eridyl]pyrazoles 5 and 1-substituted 5-[4-(1-tert-butyloxycar-
bonyl)piperidyl]pyrazoles 6.
(b) A solution of 4 or a mixture of 5 and 6 (10 mmol) in CH2-
Cl2 (30 mL) containing CF3COOH (0.5 mL) was stirred for 4 h
at room temperature. The reaction mixture was evaporated,
and the resulting residue was separated using CHP-20P
(reverse phase) column chromatography and/or recrystalliza-