Published on Web 03/03/2007
Antibody-Catalyzed Oxidation of ∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol
Andrew P. Brogan,† Lisa M. Eubanks,† George F. Koob,‡ Tobin J. Dickerson,*,† and
Kim D. Janda*,†
Contribution from the Departments of Chemistry and Immunology, The Skaggs Institute for
Chemical Biology, Worm Institute for Research and Medicine, and the Committee on the
Neurobiology of AddictiVe Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey
Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037
Received January 2, 2007; E-mail: kdjanda@scripps.edu; tobin@scripps.edu
Abstract: Marijuana abuse continues to plague society and the lack of effective treatments warrants concern.
Catalytic antibodies capable of oxidatively degrading the major psychoactive component of marijuana, ∆9-
tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC), are presented. The antibodies generate reactive oxygen species from singlet
oxygen (1O2*), using riboflavin (vitamin B2) and visible light as the 1O2* source. Cannabitriol was identified
as the major degradation product of this reaction, demonstrating the ability of an antibody to catalyze a
complex chemical transformation with therapeutic implications for treating marijuana abuse.
Introduction
ated by catalytic antibodies, primarily using transition state
analogues or reactive immunization.9 Several cocaine esterase
∆9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC) is the active component
of marijuana and the most commonly abused illicit drug in the
U.S.1,2 Marijuana use often leads to abuse of other illicit drugs
as postulated by the “cannabis gateway hypothesis”3 and
supported by clinical evidence and numerous population
surveys.4-6 Furthermore, exposure to ∆9-THC increases opiate
self-administration in an animal model by specifically altering
the endogenous opioid system, providing a molecular basis for
the gateway hypothesis.7 Currently, there are no clinical
treatments for marijuana abuse. A promising approach to combat
drug abuse is immunopharmacotherapy, where active or passive
immunizations are administered to bind the target drug before
it can reach its cognate receptor. Using this strategy, approaches
to treat cocaine, nicotine, PCP, and methamphetamine abuse
have been reported.8 However, this method is limited by the
need for stoichiometric amounts of antibody to bind the target
drug; in contrast, a catalytic antibody capable of decomposing
the drug presents a more advantageous substoichiometric system.
A wide range of chemical transformations have been acceler-
antibodies have been generated by replacing the cocaine benzyl
ester with a phosphonate ester as a mimic of the hydrolysis
transition state.10-12 Unfortunately, no obvious route for an
antibody-catalyzed reaction is apparent when examining the
structure of ∆9-THC; although, the C9-C10 olefin is expected
to be susceptible to oxidation. Oxidation reactions have proven
difficult to program into the antibody combining site; however,
a new paradigm in antibody catalysis was recently reported by
Lerner and co-workers, where all antibodies were found to have
the intrinsic ability to destroy their corresponding antigen by
generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) from singlet oxygen
(1O2*).13-17 Examples of potential ROS generated by antibodies
include hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), ozone (O3), and superoxide
(O2-), enabling a range of different reactions. We recently
reported a potential therapeutic application of this phenomenon
by demonstrating the antibody-catalyzed oxidative degradation
of nicotine into putatively pharmacologically inactive products
using visible light and riboflavin (vitamin B2), a known
photosensitizer, as the singlet oxygen source.18 On the basis of
† Departments of Chemistry and Immunology, The Skaggs Institute for
Chemical Biology, and the Worm Institute for Research and Medicine.
‡ Committee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders.
(1) Substance Abuse and Mental Health SerVices Administration. Results from
the 2001 National Household SurVey on Drug Abuse. Summary of National
Findings; NHSDA Series H-17, DHHS Publication SMA 02-3758; Office
of Applied Studies, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:
Rockville, MD, 2002; Vol. I.
(9) Xu, Y.; Yamamoto, N.; Janda, K. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 5247-
5268.
(10) Landry, D. W.; Zhao, K.; Yang, G. X.; Glickman, M.; Georgiadis, T. M.
Science 1993, 259, 1899-1901.
(11) Yang, G.; Chun, J.; Arakawa-Uramoto, H.; Wang, X.; Gawinowicz, M.
A.; Zhao, K.; Landry, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 5881-5890.
(12) Matsushita, M.; Hoffman, T. Z.; Ashley, J. A.; Zhou, B.; Wirsching, P.;
Janda, K. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 87-90.
(2) Johnston, L. D.; O’Malley, P. M.; Bachman, J. G. Monitoring the Future
National SurVey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2002; National Institute on
Drug Abuse: Bethesda, MD, 2003.
(13) Wentworth, A. D.; Jones, L. H.; Wentworth, P., Jr.; Janda, K. D.; Lerner,
R. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 10930-10935.
(14) Wentworth, P., Jr.; Jones, L. H.; Wentworth, A. D.; Zhu, X.; Larsen, N.
A.; Wilson, I. A.; Xu, X.; Goddard, W. A., III; Janda, K. D.; Eschenmoser,
A.; Lerner, R. A. Science 2001, 293, 1806-1811.
(3) Kandel, D. Science 1975, 190, 912-914.
(4) Kandel, D. Stages and Pathways of Drug InVolVement: Examining the
Gateway Hypothesis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2002.
(5) Fergusson, D. M.; Boden, J. M.; Horwood, L. J. Addiction 2006, 101, 556-
569.
(15) Wentworth, P., Jr.; Nieva, J.; Takeuchi, C.; Galve, R.; Wentworth, A. D.;
Dilley, R. B.; DeLaria, G. A.; Saven, A.; Babior, B. M.; Janda, K. D.;
Eschenmoser, A.; Lerner, R. A. Science 2003, 302, 1053-1056.
(16) Wentworth, P., Jr.; Wentworth, A. D.; Zhu, X.; Wilson, I. A.; Janda, K.
D.; Eschenmoser, A.; Lerner, R. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003,
100, 1490-1493.
(6) Kandel, D. B. JAMA, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2003, 289, 482-483.
(7) Ellgren, M.; Spano, S. M.; Hurd, Y. L. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007,
32, 607-615.
(8) Meijler, M. M.; Matsushita, M.; Wirsching, P.; Janda, K. D. Curr. Drug
DiscoV. Technol. 2004, 1, 77-89.
(17) Zhu, X.; Wentworth, P., Jr.; Wentworth, A. D.; Eschenmoser, A.; Lerner,
R. A.; Wilson, I. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 2247-2252.
9
3698
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2007, 129, 3698-3702
10.1021/ja070022m CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society