illustrates further the highly sensitive nature of this type of
alkylation and work continues to improve this process, since
one drawback is the requirement for extended reaction times
(7–10 days) for the conversion of 6 to 8.
Notes and references
‡ We explored the alkylation of pyridone 7 with bromide 6 using
Design Expert program (www.statease.com). This generated an eight
factorial set of 20 experiments including 4 centre points which were
carried out using a carousel reactor assembly, and analysis to determine
the extent of conversion and product distribution was carried out by 1H
NMR.
The second key step, the intramolecular lactam α-arylation
of 8, was achieved using Hartwig’s original conditions
(KHMDS, ( )-BINAP)13 and the arylated adduct 11 was
isolated in 44% yield. This transformation has yet to be
fully optimised but we have examined briefly other general
conditions for α-arylation,14 such as those reported by
Buchwald,14a but these were less effective in our case. One
possible issue here relates to the conformational require-
ments associated with this cyclisation step. Intermediate 8
must adopt the axial conformation shown in Scheme 1 in order
for cyclisation to take place. The fate of the equatorial
conformer of 8 under these conditions is unknown, but
may involve intermolecular reactions leading to oligomer
formation. To date, the only characterisable product from this
reaction is the tricycle 8.
The final steps to complete the synthesis of racemic cytisine
are shown in Scheme 1 and involved selective lactam reduction
of 11, which was achieved after some experimentation with
BH3ؒTHF, followed by N-debenzylation to provide ( )-1 in
21% overall yield from 8.§ This final deprotection step was
employed by O’Neill,6a although we have used somewhat
different conditions to those described earlier.
One aspect of this chemistry merits further comment. The
asymmetric synthesis of cytisine has only very recently been
achieved.8 Earlier, Coe6b used the asymmetric variant of the
Heck reaction that underpins his very direct and elegant
approach to cytisine, but this only proceeded in 22% ee. We have
investigated various methods for the catalytic asymmetric
reduction of the unsaturated ester 4 (as well as the corre-
sponding carboxylic acid), but to date we have also only
achieved modest enantiomeric excesses of the order of ≤24%
ee.¶ An efficient asymmetric entry to cytisine via an inter-
mediate such as 5 remains a goal of this programme.
In summary, we have described a novel strategy for
the synthesis of cytisine 1, which has been achieved in a total
of 8 steps from commercially available starting materials.
The route is also highly convergent but it should be stressed
that this sequence has not yet been optimised in terms
of the key transformations involved. Nevertheless, we
anticipate that the strategy outlined above, and exemplified
for cytisine, will be applicable to a range of other related
targets.
§ Synthetic material was compared directly (TLC, IR, 1H and 13C
NMR) to a commercially available sample of (Ϫ)-cytsine.
¶ Reduction of 4 was carried out in 24% ee (based on chiral HPLC)
using H2 (4 atm), Ru[(R,R)-Me-Duphos]CodؒBF4, in MeOH at 45 ЊC.
1 (a) A. Partheil, Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim, Ger.), 1894, 232, 161;
(b) H. Ing, J. Chem. Soc., 1932, 2778.
2 N. J. Leonard, in The Alkaloids, ed. R. H. F. Manske and
H. L. Holmes, Academic Press, New York, 1953, vol. 3, Chapter 19,
p. 119; K. A. Aslanov, Y. K. Kushmuradov and A. S. Sadykov,
The Alkaloids, ed. A. Brossi, Academic Press, New York, 1997,
vol. 31, Chapter 5, p. 117; H. C. S. Wood and R. Wrigglesworth,
Rodd’s Chemistry of Carbon Compounds, 2nd Edn., ed. S. Coffey,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978; Vol. IV, Part H, Chapter 38, p. 285.
3 T. Schütz, Synlett, 2003, 901.
4 (a) L. A. Pabreza, S. Dhawan and K. J. Kellar, Mol. Pharmacol.,
1991, 39, 9; (b) S. F. Heinemann and R. L. Papke, Mol. Pharmacol.,
1994, 45, 142; (c) D. J. Anderson and S. P. Arneric, Eur. J.
Pharmacol., 1994, 253, 261.
5 (a) E. E. van Tamelen and J. S. Baran, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1955, 77,
4944; (b) E. E. van Tamelen and J. S. Baran, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1958, 80, 4659; (c) F. Bohlmann, A. Englisch, N. Ottawa, H. Sander
and W. Weise, Chem. Ber., 1956, 89, 792; (d ) T. R. Govindachari,
S. Rajadurai, M. Subramanian and B. S. Thyagarajan, J. Chem. Soc.,
1957, 3839.
6 (a) B. T. O’Neill, D. Yohannes, M. W. Bundesmann
and E. P. Arnold, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 4201; (b) J. W. Coe, Org. Lett.,
2000, 2, 4205. A formal total synthesis based on ref. 6a has also
been reported: P. Nshimyumukiza, D. Cahard, J. Rouden,
M.-C. Lasne and J.-C. Plaquevent, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 7787.
7 J. W. Coe and P. R. P. Brooks, U.S. Patent 6,605,610, 2003.
8 B. Danieli, G. Lesma, D. Passarella, A. Sacchetti, A. Silvani and
A. Virdis, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 493.
9 G. R. Cook, L. G. Beholz and J. R. Stille, J. Org. Chem., 1994, 59,
3575.
10 G. R. Newkome, J. Broussard, S. K. Staires and J. D. Sauer,
Synthesis, 1974, 707.
11 H. Liu, S. B. Ko, H. Josien and D. P. Curran, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1995, 36, 8917. A variety of different conditions are presented in this
paper, and a number of these were examined in our study. Alkyl
halides tend to show lower N-selectivities under conditions suited to
more reactive allyl and propargyl halides.
12 M. R. Owen, C. Luscombe, L.-W. Lai, S. Godbert, D. L. Crookes
and D. Emiabata-Smith, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2001, 5, 308.
13 K. H. Shaughnessy, B. C. Hamann and J. F. Hartwig, J. Org.
Chem., 1998, 63, 6546. See also T. Hama, X. Liu, D. A. Culkin and
J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 11176; D. A. Culkin
and J. F. Hartwig, Acc. Chem. Res., 2003, 36, 234.
14 (a) Buchwald has described the arylation of a vinylogous amide:
T. Hamada, A. Chieffi, J. Ahman and S. L. Buchwald, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2002, 124, 1261; (b) We also evaluated an alternative
zinc-based variant that was recently reported, but without success.
See, J. Cossy, A. de Filippis and D. G. Pardo, Org. Lett., 2003, 5,
3037; (c) δ-Lactams have been produced by intramolecular
α-arylation of amide enolates, see T. Honda, H. Namiki and
F. Satoh, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 631.
Acknowledgements
We thank EPSRC (CMSG) and the EU (Marie Curie
Fellowship to CB), and we acknowledge the use of the
Chemical Database Service and the EPSRC Mass Spectrometry
Swansea Service Centre. We also thank GSK, and Drs Martin
Owen, Gillian Turner and Daniel Tray (all GSK) for their
support with the experimental design study.
O r g . B i o m o l . C h e m . , 2 0 0 4 , 2, 1 8 2 5 – 1 8 2 6
1826