M. Shanmugasundaram et al. / Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 330 (2016) 156–162
157
the refractive indices of the standard and unknown solvents,
respectively. Fs and Ff are the fluorescence quantum yields of the
standard and unknown, respectively.
Photoluminescence quantum yield of the powder samples were
measured using a calibrated integrating sphere in a SPEX Fluorolog
Spectrofluorimeter. Samples were excited at the absorption
maximum using a Xe-arc lamp as the excitation source. The
absolute quantum yield was calculated on the basis of the de Mello
method [42]. Fluorescence lifetimes were measured on an IBH
picoseconds single photon counting system using a 635-nm IBH
NanoLED source and a Hamamatsu C4878-02 micro channel plate
(MCP) detector. The fluorescence decay profiles were de-convo-
luted using IBH data station software V2.1, fitted with a mono- or
biexponential decay and minimizing the x2 values of the fit
to 1 ꢁ0.1.
Chart 1. Structures of the phthalide derivatives 1–3 investigated in the present
study.
Of the various small molecules investigated, the phthalide
(isobenzofuran-1(3H)-one) chromophore has attracted consider-
able attention in recent years [28–32]. The 3-arylidene phthalide
derivatives, in particular, have been used extensively as inter-
mediates for the synthesis of a variety of drugs and photochromic
materials [28–33]. Some of the phthalides derivatives were also
found to be biologically active as pesticidal, herbicidal, insecticidal,
antispasmodic and cytotoxic agents [34–37]. These derivatives
exhibited enhanced stability and interesting biological applica-
tions compared to the stilbene analogues because of their
structural backbone fragment diarylethene connected to an
isobenzofuran unit [36–39]. Despite these derivatives are biocom-
patible, photostable and easy to synthesize, the material applica-
tions of such systems have not been explored owing to their
Fluorescence microscopic images were obtained using a Nikon
HFX 35A Optiphot-2 polarized light optical microscope, equipped
with a Linkam THMS 600. Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM)
analysis was performed using drop casted and air dried on flat
surface of cylindrical brass stubs and subjected to thin gold coating
using JOEL JFC-1200 fine coater, which further was inserted into
Zeiss EVO 18 Cryo SCM for taking the images. The Transmission
Electron Microscopic (TEM) analysis was performed on JEOL
100 kV high resolution TEM. The compounds were dissolved in
acetonitrile to prepare the stock solution. Then by increasing the
water percentages of acetonitrile solution up to 90%, we have drop
casted on the top of carbon-coated Cu grid. The grids were
mounted on reverse tweezers and the samples were dried by a
vacuum pump under reduced pressure for 1 h at 25 ꢂC. The
accelerating voltage of the TEM was 100 kV and the beam current
was 65 A. Samples were imaged using a Hamamatsu ORCA CCD
camera.
radiationless deactivations as
a result of the free rotation,
intersystem crossing to triplet states and Z-E isomerization [38–
40]. Herein, we report the synthesis of the three functionalized
phthalide systems 1–3 (Chart 1) and tuning of their luminescent
properties through adopting aggregation and Lewis acid complex-
ation approaches. In solution and monomeric state, these
derivatives exhibited negligible fluorescence quantum yields.
However, upon self assembly in water/acetonitrile mixtures,
complexation with Lewis acids such as BCl3, and in the solid state,
these systems showed significantly enhanced luminescence
quantum yields, due to the AIE phenomenon, molecular packing
and restricted intramolecular rotation. Uniquely, these small
molecular organic systems, showed exceptional thermal and
photostability, solution processability and efficient green electro-
luminescence at 524 nm, thereby indicating their use as optoelec-
tronic materials.
The organic light emitting device (OLED) was fabricated on
glass substrates pre-coated with a layer of indium tin oxide (ITO)
having a sheet resistance of 10
V per square. The ITO substrates
were ultrasonically cleaned with detergent, deionized water,
acetone and isopropanol, and then dried by blowing nitrogen. A
layer of PEDOT:PSS was spin-coated onto the pre-cleaned ITO
substrates, and then dried in a vacuum oven at room temperature
for 30 min to extract residual water. Then the samples were
prepared in a glove box under a nitrogen protected environment
(oxygen and water contents less than 1 ppm), and the emissive
layers (EMLs) were spin-coated on top of PEDOT:PSS from toluene
and then annealed at 120 ꢂC in a vacuum oven for 30 min to remove
the residual solvent. Subsequently, the samples were transferred to
a thermal evaporator chamber (pressure less than 5 ꢃ10ꢀ4 Pa)
connected to the glove box without exposure to the atmosphere.
50 nm Tris(8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminium (AlQ3) [1,43], 1 nm
LiF, and 150 nm Al were deposited sequentially by thermal
evaporation and then electroluminescence measurements were
performed.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Methods
The melting points were determined on a Mel-Temp II melting
point apparatus. The electronic absorption spectra were recorded
on
a Shimadzu UV-3101 or 2401 PC UV–vis-NIR scanning
spectrophotometer. The fluorescence spectra were recorded on a
SPEX-Fluorolog F112X spectrofluorimeter. 1H and 13C NMR were
recorded on a 500 MHz Bruker advanced DPX spectrometer. The
mass spectra were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Exactive ESI–
MS spectrophotometer. Reactions were carried out using MAS-II
microwave synthesizer. All the solvents were purified and distilled
before use. Quantum yields of fluorescence were determined by
the relative methods using optically dilute solutions. Quinine
sulphate in 0.1 M H2SO4, with a quantum yield of 0.54 [41], was
used as the standard and the quantum yields of fluorescence were
calculated using the Eq. (1).
2.2. Materials
The starting materials and reagents were purchased from Sigma
Aldrich and used without further purification. Spectroscopic grade
solvents were purchased from Merck and used as received for
photophysical studies. The phthalide derivatives were synthesized
through a modified procedure and characterized as described in
the Supporting Experimental Section [1, mp 110–111 ꢂC (mixture
mp 110–112 ꢂC) [31]; 2, mp 128–129 ꢂC (mixture mp 128–130 ꢂC)
[31]; 3, mp 113–114 ꢂC (mixture mp 114–115 ꢂC) [31]]. The
phthalide-BCl3 complexes were prepared by dissolving the
phthalide derivatives in CH2Cl2 and the absorbance of the solution
2
As Fu nu
Au Fs ns
Ff
¼
2 Fs
ð1Þ
wherein As and Au are the absorbance of the standard and
unknown, respectively; Fs and Fu are the areas of fluorescence
peaks of the standard and unknown, respectively; and ns and nu are
was kept in between 0.3–0.5. Then 50
mL of boron trichloride (BCl3)
solution (1.0 M in CH2Cl2) was added to the phthalide solution and