Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.7 (2004)
815
result, in the case using Ms-Cl (1.30 equiv.) in pyridine (0.73
equiv.) as a solvent at 0 ꢁC for 15 min, firstly, only the secondary
alcohol was selectively protected with the Ms group to give the
corresponding mesyloxy derivative, Boc-HyVal-Thr(Ms)-OMe,
in 90% yield. Secondly, the O-Ms group was ꢀ-eliminated with
DBU in CHCl3 to give the expected Boc-HyVal-ꢀAbu-OMe
(ꢀAbu = 2-amino-2-butenoic acid residue) in 90% yield. Ac-
cordingly, similarly to the above case, the selective ꢀ-elimina-
tion of 21 with Ms-Cl in pyridine and then with DBU was tried
successfully to give only the desired 2211 in 88% yield.
S
R
N
N
S
N
N
S
S
N
N
O
N
N
RO
EtO
EtO
i)
iv)
S
S
O
O
8
OTPS
OTPS
quant
80%
HN
N
HN
N
O
O
BocHN
BocHN
S
S
OH
15:R=COOH
16:R=CONH2 (88%)
17:R=CSNH (85%)
OH
10:R=Pac (80%)
18:R=H (97%)
ii)
iii)
It is believed that the success of the selective ꢀ-elimination
of 21 can be best appreciated for the first total synthesis of 1.
v)
2
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: i) 2.67 M Jones reagent/
acetone, ii) a) ClCOOEt, Et3N/THF, b) 28% aq. NH3/THF,
iii) Lawesson’s reagent/DME, iv) a) 14, KHCO3/DME, b)
TFAA, pyridine/DME, c) 28% aq. NH3, v) 1 M LiOH/THF.
This work was supported in part by Grant-in Aid for Scien-
tific Reaserch No. 14550829 from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and by ‘‘High-Tech
Research Project’’ from the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology.
with Lawesson’s reagent gave the corresponding thiocarboxa-
mide 17. Consequently, the required thiazolation of 17 with 14
by the Hantzsch method gave 1010 in 80% yield. The Pac ester
was hydrolyzed with 1 M LiOH to give 6-bisthiazole-4-carbox-
ylic acid derivative 18, as shown in Scheme 3.
References and Notes
1
J. Shoji, T. Kato, Y. Yoshimura, and K. Tori, J. Antibiot., 34,
1126 (1981).
2
a) P. Brooks, A. T. Fuller, and J. Walker, J. Chem. Soc., 1959,
689. b) J. Walker, A. Olesker, L. Valente, R. Rabanal, and G.
Lukacs, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1977, 706. c) B. W.
Bycroft and M. S. Gowland, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
1978, 256.
Furthermore, fragment condensation of 18 with (2S,3R)-2-
amino-3-(O-TBS)hydroxy-N-[(S)-2-acetoxypropyl]butanamide
(19)9 by the BOP method was performed to give the precursor of
Fragment A–C–D segment 20. Selective deprotection of the TBS
group of the Thr residue with 70% AcOH, followed by ꢀ-elim-
ination of the deprotected intermediate 21 using Ms-Cl and Et3N
and then DBU in CHCl3 gave the protected Fragment A–C–D
derivative 22, similarly to the case of 12. At that time, however,
besides 22 (56%), undesirable compound 23 (18%), the tertiary
alcohol of 21 also dehydrated, was formed. Accordingly, to ex-
amine what procedure produces the selective ꢀ-elimination of
only the secondary alcohol of 21, the substrate Boc-HyVal-
Thr-OMe was independently prepared and then subjected to
the ꢀ-elimination under various experimental conditions. As a
3
a) Y. Yonezawa, K. Shimizu, K. Yoon, and C. Shin, Synthesis,
2000, 634. b) Y. Yonezawa, H. Saito, S. Suzuki, and C. Shin,
Heterocycles, 57, 903 (2002).
4
5
C. Shin, K. Okumura, M. Shigekuni, and Y. Nakamura, Chem.
Lett., 1998, 139.
K. Okumura, A. Ito, D. Yoshioka, and C. Shin, Heterocycles,
48, 1319 (1998).
6
7
M. A. Ciufolini and Y.-C. Shen, Org. Lett., 1, 1843 (2000).
The compound 4 was derived from the corresponding carbox-
amide and Lawesson’s reagent by the usual method.
Y. Hamada, M. Shibata, T. Sugiura, S. Kata, and T. Shioiri,
J. Org. Chem., 52, 1252 (1987).
8
9
S
N
N
K. Okumura, T. Suzuki, Y. Nakamura, and C. Shin, Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn., 72, 2483 (1999).
S
S
N
N
OTBS
H
O
OAc
10 10: Colorless powder. mp 112–115 ꢁC. [ꢁ]D +18.4ꢁ (c 0.98,
CHCl3).
11 22: Pale yellow powder. mp 119–122 ꢁC. IR (KBr) 3400, 2930,
27
N
HN
N
H N
2
EtO
O
S
O
OTPS NH
OR
19
i)
O
iii)
18
HN
N
83%
O
27
2856, 1717, 1670, 1531, 1473, 1241 cmꢂ1. [ꢁ]D +17.1ꢁ
OAc
(c 0.28, CHCl3). 1H NMR (CDCl3) ꢂ ¼ 0:95 (d, 3H,
CH(OTPS)CH3, J ¼ 6:6 Hz), 1.02 (s, 9H, TPS’s t-Bu), 1.24,
1.33 (each s, 6H, C(OH)(CH3)2), 1.27 (d, 3H, CH(OAc)CH3,
J ¼ 6:6 Hz), 1.37 (t, 3H, Et’s CH3, J ¼ 7:2 Hz), 1.45 (s, 9H,
Boc’s t-Bu), 1.87 (d, 3H, ꢀAbu’s CH3, J ¼ 6:6 Hz), 2.02 (s,
3H, Ac’s CH3), 2.76 (br s, 1H, OH), 3.42–3.70 (m, 2H,
CH2CH(OAc)), 4.38 (q, 2H, Et’s CH2, J ¼ 7:2 Hz), 4.51 (br
d, 1H, CH(OTPS)CH3, J ¼ 6:6 Hz), 4.94 (br d, 1H,
BocNHCH, J ¼ 9:0 Hz), 5.03–5.06 (m, 1H, CH(OAc)CH3),
5.35 (br d, 1H, CHCH(OTPS)-CH3, J ¼ 9:0 Hz), 5.63 (br d,
1H, BocNH, J ¼ 9:0 Hz), 6.57 (q, 1H, NHCH2OAc, J ¼
6:6 Hz), 6.65 (q, 1H, ꢀAbu’s CH, J ¼ 6:6 Hz), 7.22–7.62
(m, 10H, TPS’s Ph ꢃ 2), 7.91, 8.01, 8.14, 8.22, 8.25 (each s,
5H, thiazole’s H ꢃ 5), 8.2l, 8.71 (each br s, 2H, CONH ꢃ
2), 8.36, 8.38 (each d, 2H, pyridine’s HH ꢃ 2, J ¼ 8:4 Hz).
Anal. Calcd for C62H70N10S5Si: C, 56.44; H, 5.35; N,
10.61%. Found: C, 55.99; H, 5.50; N, 10.20%.
20:R=TBS
21:R=H (60%)
BocHN
S
ii)
S
OH
S
N
N
N
N
S
S
S
N
N
S
N
N
O
O
N
HN
N
HN
O
EtO
EtO
S
O
OTPS NH
S
+
O
O
OTPS NH
O
HN
N
HN
N
O
OAc
OAc
BocHN
BocHN
S
S
OH
22 (56%)
22 (88%)
iv)
23 (18%)
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: i) 19, BOP, DIPEA/DMF,
ii) 70% AcOH/THF, iii) a) Ms-Cl/Et3N, b) DBU/CHCl3, iv) a)
Ms-Cl, pyridine, b) DBU/CHCl3.
Published on the web (Advance View) June 7, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.814