Tarwade et al.
SCHEME 1. Curtius Rearrangements of Cycloprop-1-enoyl
azide 1 and Cyclopropanoyl azide 3
isocyanate, and both singlet and triplet pivaloylnitrene were
excluded as intermediates in both thermal and photoinduced
Curtius rearrangement of pivaloyl azide.4c-e Resonance interac-
tions in phenyl substituents are known to influence the aryl
migration rate. It has also been established that electron-releasing
groups in the meta position of benzoyl azides increase the rate
of rearrangement while all para substituents decrease the rate.1d,5
In theoretical studies,6 Hadad, Platz, and co-workers studied
the Curtius rearrangements of acetyl azide at several levels of
theory (B3LYP/6-31+G**, CCSD(T), and CBS-QB3).7 Acyl
azides can exist as both syn and anti conformations with respect
to the C-N bond. We refer to these conformations as synC-N
and antiC-N, respectively. DFT and CBS-QB3 calculations
suggest that the conformer of MeC(O)N3 with the synC-N
relationship between the carbonyl and azide group is 4.5-4.8
kcal/mol more stable than the antiC-N conformer.7 This is an
important distinction because rearrangements of synC-N acyl
azides have been calculated to proceed by a concerted mech-
anism while the higher energy antiC-N conformers tend to follow
the stepwise pathways that produce acylnitrene intermediates.7,8
It was concluded that the synC-N conformer of acetyl azide
rearranges by a concerted mechanism to methylisocyanate with
a barrier of ∼27 kcal/mol, whereas the calculated barrier for
the formation of acetylnitrene, with the attendant loss of N2,
was calculated to be higher (32 kcal/mol), leading to the
suggestion that a free nitrene is not produced in the pyrolysis
of acetyl azide. However, it was recognized that the relative
barriers for concerted versus stepwise Curtius rearrangement
could be sensitive to the substituent on the carbonyl group. It
was shown that for methoxycarbonyl azide the stepwise process
to generate the free nitrene was favored over concerted
rearrangement, an observation that is consistent with ac-
companying experimental studies of alkoxycarbonyl azides that
do produce trapable nitrenes upon thermolysis.7 Although an
experimental study on acetyl azide is not available for direct
comparison, the calculated barrier for the concerted rearrange-
ment of acetyl azide is in reasonable agreement with the
experimentally determined barriers for thermal Curtius rear-
rangements of other acyl azides.1d,3c,5
A subsequent DFT study on the Curtius rearrangement was
conducted by Zabalov and Tiger at the PBE/TZ2P level of
theory.8 The barriers to concerted rearrangement of several
synC-N and antiC-N acyl azide conformers, versus the loss of
N2 and formation of the corresponding nitrene, were reported
for formyl azide (28.0 vs 34.6 kcal/mol), acetyl azide (32.9 vs
32.9 kcal/mol), and benzoyl azide (34.5 vs 32.3 kcal/mol),
respectively.8 Because of the additional barrier associated with
the subsequent rearrangement of the acylnitrenes to the isocy-
anates (20.9, 18.9, and 13.6 kcal/mol, respectively) in a two-
step process, these authors concluded that overall concerted
pathways would be predominant. Thus, calculated relative
activation barriers suggest that rearrangement of acyl azides by
the one-step concerted mechanism is preferable to the two-step
process involving formation of acylnitrene.8
However, in a more recent computational study at the
Moller-Plesset ((MP2)(full)/6-31G*) level of theory, it was
proposed that the thermal rearrangements of acetyl azide and
benzoyl azide are stepwise processes that proceed via acylnitrene
intermediates.9 The activation energies for the formation of
acetylnitrene was calculated to be 39.2 kcal/mol, and the
transition state for the conversion of the nitrene into methyl-
isocyanate was 55.6 kcal/mol relative to the acyl azide ground
state. Similarly, unusually large activation energies were
calculated for the formation of benzoylnitrene (47.8 kcal/mol)
and phenylisocyanate (64.6 kcal/mol) relative to the benzoyl
azide ground state. By contrast, a single transition state was
located for the rearrangement of formyl azide to isocyanate with
an activation energy of 37.5 kcal/mol.
In light of these conflicting conclusions regarding the thermal
Curtius rearrangement, we considered that a combined theoreti-
cal and experimental study might provide additional insight into
the mechanism. In the course of our studies on the synthesis
and application of cyclopropene R-amino acids,10 we noticed
that acyl azides of cyclopropene biscarboxylic acids undergo
Curtius rearrangement with unusual facility. Thus, cycloprop-
1-enoyl azide 1 undergoes rearrangement to isocyanate 2 to
>90% conversion within 24 h at room temperature, whereas
elevated temperatures have been reported for similar rearrange-
ments of acyl azides derived from malonic acid (Scheme 1).11
As a control, we synthesized the cyclopropane analogue 3 and
noted that a significantly higher reaction temperature was
required for conversion into isocyanate 4 within a similar time
(4) (a) Wentrup, C.; Bornemann, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 4521. (b)
Lwowski, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1967, 6, 897. (c) Linke, S.; Tisue,
G. T.; Lwowski, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 6308. (d) Lwowski, W.; Tisue,
G. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 4022. (e) Tisue, G. T.; Linke, S.; Lwowski,
W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 6303. (f) Hauser, C. R.; Kantor, S. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 4284. (g) Horner, L.; Bauer, G.; Do¨rges, J. Chem. Ber.
1965, 98, 2631. (h) Huisgen, R.; Anselme, J.-P. Chem. Ber. 1965, 98, 2998. (i)
See pp 171-172 in Abramovitch, R. A.; Davis, B. A. Chem. ReV 1964, 64,
149.
(5) (a) The photochemical Curtius rearrangement may take place via concerted
rearrangement of the acyl azide or via a stepwise mechanism that involves an
acylnitrene. For experimental work on the photo-Curtius rearrangement, see refs
1e, 4e, and 4a and references therein. (b) Yukawa, Y.; Tsuno, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1957, 79, 5530.
(6) For computations on the Curtius rearrangements of acylnitrenes, see refs
4a, 6, and (a) Sigman, M. E.; Autrey, T.; Schuster, G. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1988, 110, 4297. (b) Yokoyama, K.; Takane, S.-Y.; Fueno, T. Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn. 1991, 64, 2230. (c) Mebel, A. M.; Luna, A.; Lin, M. C.; Morokuma, K.
J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 6439. (d) Shapley, W.; Backskay, G. B. J. Phys.
Chem. A 1999, 103, 6624. (e) Gristan, N. P.; Pritchina, E. A. MendeleeV Commun.
2001, 94. (f) Faustov, V. I.; Baskir, E. G.; Biryukov, A. A. Russ. Chem. Bull.
2003, 52, 2328.
(9) Abu-Eittah, R. H.; Mohamed, A. A.; Al-Omar, A. M. Int. J. Quantum
Chem. 2006, 106, 863.
(10) Zhang, F.; Fox, J. M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2965.
(11) (a) Yamada, S.; Ninomiya, K.; Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 26,
2343. (b) Wheeler, T. N.; Ray, J. A. Synth. Commun. 1988, 18, 141. (c) Izquierdo,
M. L.; Arenal, I.; Bernabe, M.; Alvarez, F. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 215. (d)
Baldwin, J. E.; Adlington, R. M.; Rawlings, B. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26,
481.
(7) Liu, J.; Mandel, S.; Hadad, C. M.; Platz, M. S. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
8583.
(8) Zabalov, M. V.; Tiger, R. P. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2005, 54, 2270.
8190 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 73, No. 21, 2008