M.Biava et al./ Bioorg.Med.Chem.12 (2004) 1453–1458
1457
All these considerations led to the suggestions that 1) an
aromatic system with a reduced overall size (with
respect to the naphthyl group) but more extended in
length (i.e., a biphenyl moiety), or (2) a phenyl ring
bearing a lipophilic group (such as a methyl, ethyl, or
isopropyl subtituent) at the para position could have
profitable interactions with the pharmacophoric model
(with a consequent enhancement in activity), especially
with its HY lipophilic portion.
6.1.2. Mannich bases 2–1. To a stirred solution of the
appropriate pyrrole 19 (5.6 mmol) in 20 mL of acetoni-
trile, a mixture of N-methylpiperazine or thiomorpho-
line (5.6 mmol), formaldehyde (5.6 mmol) (40% in
water) and 5 mL of acetic acid was added dropwise.
After the addition was complete the mixture was stirred
at room temperature for 3 h. The mixture was then
treated with a solution of sodium hydroxide (20%, w/v)
(100 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (200 mL).
The organic extracts were combined, washed with water
(200 mL) and dried. After removal of solvent, the resi-
due was purified by column chromatography. The elu-
ates were combined after TLC control and the solvent
was removed to give the pure product.
The thiomorpholino sulphur atom of each pyrrole deri-
vative corresponded to the hydrogen bond acceptor
feature of the pharmacophoric model.
Finally, the methyl group at the position 2 of the pyr-
role nucleus seemed to be not important for interacting
directly with the pharmacophoric elements. On the con-
trary, it played a crucial role in determining the
conformational properties of each compound, in parti-
cular the orientation of the aromatic ring directly linked
to the pyrrole nitrogen with respect to the side chain
bearing the thiomorpholine system. On the basis of all
the above results, compounds with unsubstituted phenyl
rings, such as 14, were found unexpectedly to have an
interesting profile that the pharmacophoric model is at
the moment unable to justify.
Physicochemical data are reported in Table 5.
1
2: Yield: H NMR (CDCl3) d: 1.97 (s, 3H, pyrrole 2-
CH3), 2.56-2.69 (m, thiomorpholine 8H), 3.39 (s, 2H, 3-
CH2-thiomorph), 6.24 (s, 1H, pyrrole 4H), 6.83–7.29
(m, 9H, aromatic protons).
1
3: Yield: H NMR (CDCl3) d: 1.98(s, 3H, N-CH3), 2.29
(s, 3H, pyrrole 2-CH3), 2.45 (m, 8H, N-methylpiper-
azine 2 and 3-CH2), 3.42 (s, 2H, CH2-N), 6.30 (s, 1H,
pyrrole 4H), 7.1–7.34 (m, 10H, aromatic protons).
6.2. Microbiology
6. Experimental
6.2.1. Compounds. All compounds 2–15 and drug refer-
ences were dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 10
mg/mL and stored cold until used.
Melting points were uncorrected and taken on a
Fischer-Jones apparatus. Infrared spectra (Nujol mulls)
were run on a 297 Perkin–Elmer spectrophotometer.
NMR spectra were recorded for all the synthesized
compounds on a 200 Brucker spectrometer using deu-
terochloroform as solvent and TMS as internal stan-
dard. Microanalyses of compounds 2–15 were
performed by the Servizio di Microanalisi dell’ Area di
Ricerca di Roma del CNR (Dr.F.Tarli, Dr. Petrilli and
Mr. Dianetti). Carlo Erba aluminum oxide (activity II-
III, according to Brockmann) was used for chromato-
graphic purifications. Fluka Stratocrom aluminum
oxide plates with fluorescent indicator were used for
thin-layer chromatography (TLC) to check the purity of
the compounds.
6.2.2. Antimycobacterial activity. All compounds were
preliminarily assayed against two freshly isolated clinical
strains, M.fortuitum CA10 and M.tuberculosis B814
according to the dilution method in agar.12 Growth
media were Mueller–Hinton (Difco) containing 10% of
OADC (oleic acid, albumine and dextrose complex) for
M.fortuitum and Middlebrook 7H11 agar (Difco) with
10% of OADC (albumine dextrose complex) for M.
tuberculosis. Substances were tested at the single dose of
100 g/mL. The active compounds were then assayed for
inhibitory activity against a variety of mycobacterium
strains in Middlebrok 7H9 broth using the NCCLS
procedure. They are reported in Tables 1 and 2. The
mycobacterium species used were M.tuberculosis
103471 and among the atypical mycobacteria M.smeg-
matis 103599, M.gordonae 6427, M.marinum 6423 and
M.avium 103317 (from the Institute Pasteur collection).
6.1. Syntheses
6.1.1. Diketones 18. To a solution of the suitable ary-
laldehyde (0.09 mol), triethylamine (0.14 mol), methyl
vinyl ketone (0.07 mol) and 3-ethyl-5-(2-hydroxyethyl)-
4-methylthiazolium bromide (0.014 mol) were added.
The mixture was heated at 70 ꢀC for 24 h under nitrogen
atmosfere. At the end the mixture was treated with 2 N
HCl (10 mL) and after extraction with methylene chlo-
ride (200 mL), the organic layer was washed with aqu-
eous sodium bicarbonate (100 mL) and water (200 mL).
The organic fractions were dried over Na2SO4, filtered
and concentrate to give a crude product that was chro-
matographed (Al2O3; hexane/ethylacetate, 1/1).
In all cases, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs
in mg/mL) for each compound were determined. The
MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of drug
that yielded an absence of visual torbidity. Stock solu-
tions of substances were prepared by dissolving a
known weight of agent in DMSO. The stock solutions
were sterilized by passage throught a 0.2 mm Nylon
membrane filter. Serial 2-fold dilutions of the com-
pounds with water were prepared. The tubes were incu-
bated at 37 ꢀC for 3–21 days. A control tube without
any drug was included in each experiment. Isoniazid (INH),
Streptomycin and pyrrolnitrin were used as controls.
6.1.2. Pyrroles 19. The title compounds were prepared
according to the general procedure previously described.5