efficiently undergo homocoupling with liberation of a ketone
molecule through C(sp)-C(sp3) bond cleavage to regio- and
stereoselectively produce 1,4-diaryl-2-hydroxymethyl-(E)-
enynes 2 (Scheme 1, a).5e Notably, the products readily
Table 1. Rhodium-Catalyzed Reaction of tert-Propargyl
Alcohols with Bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylenea
Scheme 1
entry
X
R
ligand time (h)
4, % yieldb
2, % yieldb
1
OH Ph dppb
OH Ph dppb
2
4
4
4
9
8
4
8
2
4
4
64e
16
trace
16
trace
3
8
20
6
trace
31
trace
2c
99 (98)e
cyclize in the presence of a base to form dihydrofuran
derivatives, some of which exhibit strong fluorescence in
the solid state. During the examination of cross-coupling
using 1, we have observed that the propargyl alcohols
selectively react with bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene (3) via
activation of one of the C(sp)-Si bonds to afford the
corresponding 1-aryl-4-trimethylsilyl-(E)-enynes 4 (Scheme
1, b). The silyl function has also been subjected to further
structural elaboration to lead to a donor-acceptor (D-A)
π-conjugated system on the dihydrofuran scaffold.
When a mixture of 1,1,3-triphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol (1ap)
(0.5 mmol) was treated with 3 (3 mmol) in the presence of
[(cod)Rh(OH)]2/dppb (4 mol %) in refluxing toluene for 2
h, 2-[(E)-benzylidene]-4-trimethylsilyl-1,1-diphenyl-3-butyn-
1-ol (4ap) was produced along with the homocoupling
product 2ap in 64% and 16% yields (calculated as 2[product]/
[1a], see below), respectively (entry 1 in Table 1). Addition
of 1ap in a slow manner through a cannula to keep the
concentration of 1ap low could successfully suppress the
formation of 2ap to allow the almost exclusive formation
of 4ap (entry 2). Analysis of the reaction mixture by GC-
MS confirmed the formation of 1-phenyl-2-(trimethylsilyl)-
acetylene and benzophenone in quantitative yields (0.5 equiv)
as the byproducts, which may provide important mechanistic
information. Decreasing the amount of 3 to 1.0 mmol still
gave 76% of 4ap (entry 3). The reaction was found to be
sensitive to the variation of ligand. The use of dppp or dppe
in place of dppb reduced the yield of 4ap and induced the
formation of its (Z)-isomer in a small, but considerable
amount (entries 4 and 5). The reaction without any phosphine
ligand was sluggish (entries 7 and 8). The use of [(cod)-
3c,f OH Ph dppb
76e
4c
5c
6c
7c
8c
9c
OH Ph dppp
OH Ph dppe
OH Ph PPh3
OH Ph
76 (71) (96:4)g
64 (57) (89:11)g
d
43 (37)e
32
Cl
Cl
Ph
Ph dppb
6
60
10
11c
OH Me dppb
OH Me dppb
62e
89 (88)e
a Reaction conditions: [Rh]:[ligand]:[1]:[3] ) 0.02:0.02:0.5:3.0 (in
mmol), in refluxing toluene (4 mL) under N2. b GC yield based on the half
amount of 1 used. Value in parentheses indicates isolated yield. c Toluene
solution of 1 (2 mL, 0.25 mM) was added over 2 h. d PPh3 (0.04 mmol)
was used. e Exclusively (E)-isomer. f [3] ) 1.0 mmol. g E/Z ratio.
RhCl]2 in place of the hydroxyl complex together with dppb
was less effective (entry 9). The reaction of 2-methyl-4-
phenyl-3-butyn-2-ol (1am) proceeded similarly (entries 10
and 11).
The cross-coupling reactions of various 3-(4-substituted
phenyl)-1,1-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ols 1bp-1fp with the di-
silylacetylene 3 in the double scale of entry 2 in Table 1
gave the corresponding products 4bp-4fp with good isolated
yields irrespective of the nature of the 4-substituents (Scheme
2).
Scheme 2
(4) (a) Satoh, T.; Miura, M. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 14, 1. (b)
Murakami, M.; Ito, Y. Top. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 3, 97. (c) Rybtchinski,
B.; Milstein, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 870. (d) Mitsudo, T.;
Kondo, T. Synlett 2001, 309. (e) Perthuisot, C.; Edelbach, B. L.; Zubris,
D. L.; Simhai, N.; Iverson, C. N.; Mu¨ller, C.; Satoh, T.; Jones, W. D. J.
Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2002, 189, 157. (f) Jun, C.-H.; Moon, C. W.; Lee,
D.-Y. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 2423. (g) Catellani, M. Synlett 2003, 298. (h)
Nishimura, T.; Araki, H.; Maeda, Y.; Uemura, S. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2997.
(i) Nishimura, T.; Uemura, S. Synlett 2004, 201. (j) Murakami, M.; Makino,
M.; Ashida, S.; Matsuda, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2006, 79, 1315.
(5) (a) Terao, Y.; Wakui, H.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10407. (b) Terao, Y.; Wakui, H.; Nomoto, N.; Satoh,
T.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5236. (c) Terao, Y.;
Nomoto, N.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
6942. (d) Wakui, H.; Kawasaki, S.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8658. (e) Funayama, A.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15354.
A plausible mechanism for the formation of the enyne 4
is illustrated in Scheme 3, in which neutral ligands are
omitted. The first step involves the reaction of 1 with
hydroxyrhodium(I) species to form rhodium alcoholate A
and the successive â-carbon elimination with liberation of
benzophenone or acetone gives arylalkynylrhodium B. Then,
the alkynyl exchange between B and 3 takes place to from
2232
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 11, 2007