Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2015, 91 1221
(Perkin-Elmer Waltham, MA) was used to process data. Circular regions
of interest (ROI) were defined around the tumor and fluorescent intensity
was recorded as the average radiant efficiency ((p sꢀ1 cmꢀ2 srꢀ1)/
(lW cmꢀ2)).
Postacquisition image processing. Maestro and Nuance Camera
unmixed images were processed using ImageJ 1.44p (NIH) software.
Grayscale images were enhanced using Lookup Tables setting Royal and
brightness was adjusted using Image Adjust setting of Brightness/Con-
trast. All images shown were set to different scales.
Statistical analysis. All data were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism 5
software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). To test for differences
between two groups with normal distribution, a two-tailed Student’s t-test
(unpaired) was used, error bars represent ꢁ standard deviation of mean,
the confidence intervals set at 95%.
Chemistry. All reactions were carried under an inert atmosphere using
heat gun dried glassware. The reaction mixture(s) was stirred using a
magnetic stirrer. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was done on pre-
coated silica gel sheets (layer thickness: 0.25 mm) or aluminum oxide
sheets. Column chromatography was performed either over silica gel 60
(70–230 mesh) or neutral alumina grade III. In some cases preparative
TLC was used for the purification of compounds. Solvents were dried
following the standard methodology. 1H NMR spectra were recorded at
room temperature in CDCl3 solution using a Varian VNMRS-400 spec-
trometer. All chemicals shifts are reported in parts per million (d). 1H
NMR (400 MHz) spectra were referenced to residual CHCl3 (7.26 ppm)
or TMS (0.00 ppm). Mass spectrometry analyses were performed at the
Mass Spectrometry Facility, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
UV-visible spectra were recorded on FT UV-visible spectrophotometer
using dichloromethane/THF as solvent.
General procedure for the synthesis of NIR cyanine dyes. Commer-
cially available CD 9 (IR820) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich, St.
Louis, MO, while the CDs 10, 15 and 16 were prepared according to the
published procedure (20–22). In general, the overall synthesis of cyanine
dyes involves three main steps (2.9.1–2.9.3) and was carried out using
modified reported procedure (23).
starting chloro cyanine disappears. The reaction mixture was then
cooled to room temperature. The reaction product obtained after
removing the water (under vacuum) was suspended in ether, and the
product was filtered and was further purified by silica gel column
chromatography (10% MeOH-DCM) to afford the desired CD 21.
Synthesis of the cyanine dye 11. The synthetic steps 1 and 2 as dis-
cussed above were followed by reacting compound 5 (obtained from
cyclohexanone 3) with benzoindolium salt 8, and the title compound was
isolated in 46% yield after following the standard procedure. UV-vis kmax
(in MeOH): 820 nm; 1HNMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): d 8.60 (d, 2H,
J = 14 Hz), 8.26 (d, 2H, J = 10 Hz), 7.99 (m, 4H), 7.62–7.69 (m, 5H),
7.49 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.32 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.10 (m, 1H), 6.43 (d,
2H, J = 14 Hz), 4.35 (t, 4H, J = 7.6 Hz), 3.22 (dd, 1H, J = 4, 12 Hz),
2.82–3.00 (m, 8H), 1.87–2.15 (m, 22H),. EIMS (m/z): 991 (M+ +2Na).
HRMS: Calcd. For C53H56ClN3O7S: 945.3248. Found: 945.3276.
Synthesis of cyanine dye 12. The cyclohexanone 3 was converted to
the corresponding intermediate 7, by following the general procedure
(step 1). It was dissolved in N, N-dimethyl formamide and reacted with
benzoindolinium salt 8 to afford the title compound in 42% yield. UV-
vis kmax (in MeOH): 820 nm, 1HNMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): d 8.55 (d,
2H, J = 14 Hz), 8.26 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.02 (d, 2H, J = 10.8 Hz),
7.98 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.79 (d, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz), 7.63 (dt, 2H,
J = 8.4, 1.2 Hz), 7.48 (dt, 2H, J = 7.6, 0.8 Hz), 6.41 (d, 2H,
J = 14 Hz), 4.37 (t, 4H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.15–3.18 (m, 2H), 2.90 (t, 4H,
J = 7.6 Hz), 2.67–2.76 (m, 3H), 2.08–2.12 (m, 4H), 2.03 (s, 12H), 1.96–
2.00 (m, 4H),. EIMS (m/z): 915 (M+ +2Na); HRMS: Calcd. For
C47H50N2O8S2Cl: 869.2697. Found: 869.2659.
Synthesis of cyanine dye 14. It was prepared by reacting 9 with thio-
phenol 13 following the general procedure discussed above (step 3) in
78% yield. UV-vis kmax (in MeOH): 831 nm (2 = 157 000 cmꢀ1);
1HNMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): d 8.90 (d, 2H, J = 14 Hz), 8.14 (d, 2H,
J = 10 Hz), 7.95 (t, 4H, J = 10 Hz), 7.56–7.64 (m, 5H), 7.44 (t, 2H,
J = 7.2 Hz), 7.33 (m, 3H), 7.10 (m, 1H), 6.36 (d, 2H, J = 14 Hz), 4.29
(t, 4H, J = 7.6 Hz), 2.84–2.94 (m, 8H), 1.97–2.15 (m, 10H), 1.79 (s,
12H). EIMS (m/z): 946 (M+ +2Na); HRMS: Calcd. For C52H56N2O6S3:
901.3379. Found: 900.3362.
Step-1: A solution of N, N-Dimethyl formamide (1 mmole) in
dichloromethane (10 mL) was stirred at 0°C and was added phospho-
rus oxychloride (1 mmole) drop wise over a period of 15 min. After
stirring for an additional hour at 0°C, cyclohexanone (1–3) derivative
(2 mmole) was added to the reaction vessel. The entire mixture was
heated under reflux for 1 h, then cooled and treated with a mixture of
aniline and ethanol (1:1). For 7, N,N-Dimethyl formamide was used
instead of the combination of aniline and ethanol. Stirring was contin-
ued for an additional 30 min, and then the resulting solution was
poured onto a mixture of crushed ice and concentrated hydrochloric
acid. The crude mixture was kept at 4°C for overnight; the resulting
crystalline product was filtered. The precipitate was washed with cold
water and ether, and finally dried under a reduced pressure; yielded
the corresponding cyclohexene analogs 4–7 in >60% yield.
Step-2: Indolium salt 8 (2 mmol), Vilsmeier–Haack reagent (1 mmol)
and anhydrous sodium acetate (4 mmol) were dissolved in absolute etha-
nol (25 mL) and the entire mixture was stirred at room temperature for
12 h under a nitrogen atmosphere. The intermediate 7 showed limited
solubility in ethanol, and therefore, N, N-dimethylformamide was used as
a solvent. The residue obtained after removing the solvent on a rotary
evaporator, was treated with ether (drop by drop). The product so
obtained was filtered, and the crude dye was further purified by Silica Gel
column chromatography, eluting with dichloromethane/methanol
(90:10) to afford the pure cyanine dye(s) 9–12 in modest yield (40–55%).
Step-3: A solution of cyanine dye (1 mmol) and thiophenol deriva-
tive (10 mmol) in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (20 mL) under
a nitrogen atmosphere was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The
solvent was removed on a rotary evaporator and the crude obtained
was triturated with diethyl ether to precipitate the thiol substituted
cyanine dye, which was further purified by silica gel chromatography,
eluting with dichloromethane/methanol (90:10) to obtain the pure dye
(s) 14–19 in the range 60–80% yield.
Synthesis of cyanine dye 17. Compounds 10 with 13 (4-aminophenylth-
iol) were reacted by following the methodology as discussed above (step 3)
and the title compound was obtained in 73% yield; UV-vis kmax (in
MeOH): 829 nm, 1HNMR (400 MHz, CD3OD):
d 9.00 (d, 2H,
J = 14 Hz), 8.22 (d, 2H, J = 14 Hz), 7.91–8.02 (m, 4H), 7.58–7.63 (m,
4H), 7.44 (t, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.10 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 6.62 7.10 (d, 2H,
J = 8.4 Hz), 6.38 (d, 2H, J = 14 Hz), 4.34 (t, 4H, J = 7.6 Hz), 4.22 (q,
2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 2.82–2.94 (m, 2H), 1.95–2.08 (m, 10H), 1.85 & 1.82 (s,
12H), 1.24 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz). EIMS (m/z): 1032 (M+ +2Na); HRMS:
Calcd. For C55H61N3O8S3: 987.3621. Found: 987.3570.
Synthesis of cyanine dye 18. Synthesized by following the procedure
discussed above (step 3) by reacting dye 11 with 13 (4-aminophenylthiol)
in 77% yield; UV-vis kmax (in MeOH): 825 nm, 1HNMR (400 MHz,
CD3OD): d 9.02 (d, 2H, J = 14 Hz), 8.18 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.02 (d,
2H, J = 10.8 Hz), 7.97 (t, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.67 (d, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz),
7.60–7.63 (m, 4H), 7.48 (dt, 2H, J = 7.6, 0.8 Hz), 7.32 (t, 2H,
J = 7.6 Hz), 7.14 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 6.68 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 6.39 (d,
2H, J = 14 Hz), 4.29 (t, 4H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.15–3.21 (m, 2H), 2.80–2.96
(m, 3H), 2.85 (t, 4H, J = 7.6 Hz), 1.92–2.12 (m, 4H), 1.98 (s, 6H), 1.83
(s, 6H).. EIMS (m/z): 1079 (M+ +2Na); HRMS: Calcd. For
C59H62N4O7S3: 1034.3781. Found: 1034.3770.
Synthesis of cyanine dye 19. The desired dye was obtained by reacting
12 with 13 (4-aminophenylthiol) in 80% yield (for a general procedure,
see step 3). UV-vis kmax (in MeOH): 825 nm, 1HNMR (400 MHz,
CD3OD): d 8.43 (d, 2H, J = 14 Hz), 8.15 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.92 (d,
2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.88 (d, 2H, J = 10.8 Hz), 7.59 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz),
7.53 (dt, 2H, J = 8.4, 1.2 Hz), 7.37 (dt, 2H, J = 7.6, 0.8 Hz), 6.91 (d,
2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 6.55 (d, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz), 6.31 (d, 2H, J = 14 Hz), 4.26
(t, 4H, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.13–3.17 (m, 2H), 2.82 (t, 4H, J = 7.6 Hz), 2.55–
2.63 (m, 3H), 1.86–2.02 (m, 8H), 1.92 (s, 12H).. EIMS (m/z): 915 (M+
+2Na); HRMS: Calcd. For C53H58N3O8S3: 960.3381. Found: 960.3410.
Synthesis of cyanine dye 21. Following the methodology presented
above (step 4), the CD 10 and 4-aminoboronic acid 20 were reacted and
the title CD was obtained in 48% yield; UV-vis kmax (in MeOH):
787 nm, 1HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): 8.07 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.94 (t,
4H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.53–7.61 (m, 6H), 7.40–7.44 (m, 2H), 6.98–7.01 (m,
4H), 6.23 (d, 2H, J = 12 Hz), 4.21–4.27 (t, 6H), 3.02–3.05 (m, 4H),
Step 4: (Used only for the preparation of CD 21): To a dry flask, the
dye 10 (1.0 mmol), 4-carboxyphenylboric acid (20) (1.8 mmol) and
degassed water (10 mL) was added. The reaction mixture was heated
under reflux in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 (0.065 mmol) for 12 h.
The reaction progress was monitored by visible/near-infrared spec-
troscopy for aliquots diluted with methanol until absorption of the