Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
Cryo-TEM analyses also provided insight as to the special
role played by (10%, v/v) DMF as cosolvent, which facilitates
these MH reactions in water. Other potential solvents (DMSO,
MeOH, etc.) that could, in principle, function similarly (e.g., if
only for substrate dissolution purposes) were totally ineffective
(Figure 4). The images reveal that the size of the typically
Table 1. ICP-MS Analyses of Dry Powder, Remaining
Material, and Supernatant
Dry powder
(10 mg)
Leftover
(1.2 mg)
Supernatant
(1.7 mL)
Mg (mg)
Fe (mg)
Pd (mg)
0.983
0.627
0.039
0.089
0.587
0.033
0.894
0.051
0.0018
High resolution XPS measurements further disclosed the
oxidation states and variation of content of different elements
in the nanomaterial before and after exposure to water (see
SI). The P 2p spectrum reveals that the proportion of P(V) is
much higher than that of P(III) on the surface of the dry
powder spheres. And the Pd 3d spectrum indicated that the
oxidation state of Pd in the nanomaterial is Pd(II), rather than
Pd(0).
Figure 4. (A) Cryo-TEM analyses of NP catalyst among nanomicelles
of TPGS-750-M. (B) Cryo-TEM of NP catalyst in the same micellar
media, but after adding DMF as cosolvent.
Control experiments, the results from which are shown in
Table 2, correlated NP catalyst changes and resulting activity
with changes in reaction conditions used for MH couplings.
First, and as expected, neither nanomicelles nor nanorods were
formed (i.e., the NPs remained as spheres) when an organic
solvent such as THF (entry 2) or DMF (entry 3) was used as
the reaction medium, leading to only 9% and 41% yields,
respectively. Reaction in pure, degassed water, in which the
nanorod structure could form but in the absence of
nanomicelles (entry 4), led to a 68% yield of cinnamate
coupling product. The reaction containing both nanomicelles
and nanorod catalyst in surfactant/water, but in the absence of
the majority of ligand (t-Bu3P) upon removal of the aqueous
medium and replacement with fresh TPGS-750-M/water
(entry 5), gave only a 78% yield. However, replenishing this
newly introduced aqueous reaction mixture by addition of
fresh ligand (entry 6) resulted in the expected yield increase.
Utilizing the initially removed aqueous supernatant (entry 7)
as reaction medium and adding fresh reaction partners (along
with base and NaCl), likewise, gave a yield quite similar to
levels observed previously (entries 1 and 6) which contained
the same amount of t-Bu3P in the pot. These last two entries
provide strong evidence that all reaction components, although
most notably, the required levels of phosphine, which under
the reaction conditions are distributed between the surface of
the NPs and, mainly, best accommodated within the
nanomicelles in the water, must be present for a highly
successful reaction outcome.
spherical nanomicelle derived from TPGS-750-M (40−60 nm;
see A)13b is expanded upon addition of DMF to 100 nm (as
seen in B). Moreover, the nanorod NPs present in water alone
are distinctly separated from the nanomicelles; there is no
interaction between them (as in A). However, upon addition
of DMF, and in addition to nanomicelle swelling,14 the crucial
“nano-to-nano” effect15 is now operating, leading to substrate
(within the micelles) delivery to the NP catalyst with the
resulting reactivity enhancement manifested by much higher
levels of conversion and associated isolated yields being
obtained under mild conditions.
Application to Mizoroki−Heck (MH) Couplings. With
considerable insight as to the nature of the active NP catalyst
involved (i.e., its optimized preparation, its interactions with
nanomicelles present in the aqueous medium, and the role of
added DMF), the scope of this ppm level Pd catalysis (1000−
2500 ppm or 0.10−0.25 mol %) for MH couplings was
evaluated (Table 3). Several aryl and heteroaryl iodides,
together with various alkenyl partners, were examined. Most
reactions took place quite smoothly and afforded excellent
yields of coupled products. Numerous functional groups are
tolerated, including methoxy- (1, 3, 6), ester (1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8),
ketone (2), chloride- (5), nitrile- (7, 9), trifluoromethyl- (10,
11, 12, 14), thio- (10), nitro- (11, 14), a Boc-protected amine
(12), fluoride- (17, 24), isolated olefins (19), aldehyde (20,
Table 2. Control Experiments
Nanorod Aquecus Excess
Entry
Conditions
structure micelles
ligand Yield
1
2
3
4
5
2 wt % TPGS-750-M/H2O as reaction medium
THF as reaction medium
DMF as reaction medium
Degassed H2O as reaction medium
Fe/ppm Pd NPs stirred in degassed H2O for 1 h; remove H2O; add starting materials, K3PO4, and NaCI; add
fresh 2 wt % TPGS-750-M/H2O as reaction medium (no phosphine)
Fe/ppm Pd NPs stirred In degassed H2O for 1 h; remove H2O; add t-Bu3P, starting materials, K3PO4, and NaCI;
add fresh 2 wt % TPGS-750-M/H2O as reaction medium
Fe/ppm Pd NPs stirred in 2 wt % TPGS-750-M/H2O for 1 h; remove aq. surfactant solution; add fresh starting
materials, K3PO4, and NaCl; add back the previously removed aq. surfactant solution as the reaction medium
99%
9%
41%
68%
78%
95%
92%
no
no
no
no
no
no
6
7
3377
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 3373−3382