Page 5 of 8
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
ARTICLE
studied in a 10 mm quartz cell with stirring or in a 1 mm and 0.1
mm quartz cells without stirring. The radiatiDoOnIi:n1t0e.1n0s3iVt9iie/eCws9AwPrtPeic0rlee0O04n2.l86inC6e
Physical measurements
1H-NMR spectra were recorded in CD3CN and CD3COCD3 on a Bruker 10–6 Einstein s–1 L–1 for λ = 365 nm and 9.38 10–7 Einstein s–1 L–1 for λ
400, 500 or 600 MHz, and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 101 or = 313 nm. For calculation of the spectra of the Z-isomers of dyes 1
151 MHz at ambient temperature using 5 mm tubes. Chemical shifts and 2 by Fischer's method the solutions were irradiated at λ = 313,
were determined with accuracy of 0.01 and 0.1 ppm for H and 13C 365 and 405 nm until the photostationary states were attained.29
1
spectra, respectively, and are given relative to the residual signal of
the solvent that was used as internal reference. Spin−spin coupling
constants for the proton spectra were determined with accuracy of
0.1 Hz. The 1H NMR signal assignments were performed using COSY
and NOESY 2D NMR techniques. The 13C NMR signal assignments
were performed by means of HSQC and HMBC 2D NMR techniques.
The reaction course and purity of the final products was
followed by TLC on silica gel (DC-Fertigfolien ALUGRAM Xtra SIL60
G/UV254, MACHEREY-NAGEL). TLC was performed on silica gel on
DC-Fertigfolien, eluent: EtOAc, Hexane. Column chromatography
was conducted over silica gel (Kieselgel, particle size 40-60 µm, 60
Å, Acros Organics) on a flash chromatograph Biotage Isolera Prime
and HPLC UltiMate 3000.
To determine the quantum yields of the forward and backward
reactions of E—Z photoisomerization of dyes 1 and 2 the kinetics of
changes in the absorption of 4.010-5 M solutions of dyes upon
irradiation with 365 nm light were analyzed. For this purpose, the
program Sa3.3 (Simulation–adjustment) allowing the numerical
simulation of the concentration of the various species versus time
and the optimization of the parameter values until a good fit is
obtained was used36,37
.
The absorption spectra of the
corresponding Z-isomers were preliminarily obtained using the
Fisher's method. The quantum yield of the forward
photocycloaddition reaction of dye 1 was determined by analyzing
the kinetics of spectral changes upon irradiation of 1.010-3
M
Preparation and handling of the solutions were carried out
under red light. Photochemical reactions were carried out with a
high-pressure Hg vapor lamp (120 W) and an immersed Hg
photoreactor (125 W) with a borosilicate glass filter.
Elemental analyses were carried out in the Microanalysis
Laboratory of the A.N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement
Compounds.
solution of dye 1 with 365 nm light. The quantum yield of the
backward photocycloaddition reaction was determined by analyzing
the kinetics of spectral changes upon irradiation of 1.010-5
M
solution of cyclobutane 1b with 313 nm light. In both cases, during
the fitting procedure using the program Sa3.3, the quantum yields
of the forward and backward reaction of E—Z photoisomerization
of dye 1 were fixed as known.
Melting points were measured on Melt-temp melting point
electrothermal apparatus and were uncorrected.
Synthesis of compounds
Synthesis of (E)-2-(3,4-dimethoxystyryl)quinoxaline (1) has beens
described in14.
Steady-state optical measurements
Synthesis
of
2,2'-((1R,2R,3S,4S)-2,4-bis(3,4-
The absorption spectra were obtained on a fiber-optic AvaSpec-
2048-USB2, Avantes BV spectrophotometer or Varian-Cary 300
spectrophotometer. Fluorescence spectra were measured on a
FluoroLog-3-221 spectrofluorometer. Spectral measurements were
carried out in air-saturated acetonitrile solutions (acetonitrile of
spectrophotometric grade, water content 0.005%, Aldrich) at 20 ± 1
C°; the concentrations of the studied compounds were about from
4.010-6 M to 110-3 M. All measured fluorescence spectra were
corrected for the nonuniformity of detector spectral sensitivity.
Coumarin 481 in ethanol (φfl = 0.78) was used as a reference for the
fluorescence quantum yield measurements. The fluorescence
dimethoxyphenyl)cyclobutane-1,3-diyl)diquinoxaline (1b). Solution
of 1 in acetonitrile (10-3M) was irradiated with unfiltered light of
high pressure mercury lamp for 4 minutes. The product was
1
isolated by HPLC, eluent: H2O:CH3CN, 35:65, m.p. 79-81°C, H NMR
(MeCN-d3, 500.13 MHz, 25 °C) d: 3.53 (s, 6Н, OСН3), 3.62 (s, 6Н,
ОСН3), 4.99 (m, 2Н, H-a, H-d), 5.28 (m, 2Н, H-b, H-c), 6.65-6.67 (d,
2Н, Н-15, Н-15', 4J = 8.0), 6.81 (s, 2Н, H-12, Н-12'), 6.87-6.89 (d, 2Н,
Н-16, Н-16', 3J = 8.0), 7.74 (m, 2Н, Н-7, H-7'), 7.80 (m, 2Н, Н-7, H-7'),
7.97-7.99 (d, 2Н, Н-6, H-6', 3J = 8.0), 8.05-8.07 (d, 2Н, Н-9, H-9', 3J =
8.0), 8.62 (s, 2Н, H-3, Н-3'); 13С NMR (MeCN-d3, 500.13 MHz, 25 °C)
δ: 43.8 (2C, C-a, C-d), 46.9 (2C, C-b, C-c), 55.1 (4C, ОСН3), 111.1 (2C,
C-15, C-15'), 112.0 (2C, C-12, C-12'), 120.3 (2C, C-16, C-16'), 128.8
(2C, C-9, C-9'), 129.1 (2C, C-6, C-6'), 129.3 (2C, C-7, C-7'), 129.9 (2C,
C-8, C-8'), 132.4 (2C, C-2, C-2'), 140.8 (2C, C-10, C-10'), 141.8 (2C, C-
quantum yields were calculated by eqn (1),
1 ― 10 ― 퐴
)
∙ 푛2
푅
푆 ∙
(
∙
휑푓푙 = 휑푓푅푙
,
(1)
―퐴
2
(
)
푆푅
1 ― 10
∙ 푛푅
wherein φfl and φfl are the fluorescence quantum yields of the 5, C-5'), 146.7 (2C, C-3, C-3'), 147.6 (2C, C-13, C-13'), 148.6 (2C, C-
R
studied solution and the standard compound, respectively; A and AR 14, C-14'), 156.2 (2C, C-11, C-11'). Elemental analysis: calculated (%)
are the absorption of the studied solution and the standard for C36H32N4O4 (MW 568.44): C, 73.20; H, 5.63; N, 9.30; found C,
respectively; S and SR are the areas underneath the curves of the 73.95; H, 5.52; N, 9.58.
fluorescence spectra of the studied solution and the standard
Synthesis of (E)-2-styrylquinoxaline (2). A solution of 2.8 mmol
respectively; and n and nR are the refraction indices of the solvents of 2-methylquinoxaline, 2.10 mmol of benzaldehyde, 1.03 mmol of
for the substance under study and the standard compound. The piperidine, and 1.50 mmol of acetic acid in toluene was kept in an
quantum yields were calculated using corrected fluorescence inert atmosphere at 115°C for 48 h, and then the reaction mixture
spectra.
was evaporated in a vacuum. The residue was purified with column
The light intensity was measured by a Nova P/N 7Z01500 chromatography (SiO2, eluent hexane–ethyl acetate, 2:1). The
power meter equipped with 3A-FS P/N 7Z02628 thermal product was recrystallized from methanol to yield 0.10 g (20%),
power/energy measurement sensor . The photochemical m.p. 102-105°C, lit. 106-107.5oC.30 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 400.13
transformations were induced by irradiation of acetonitrile MHz, 25 °C): 7.39 (t, 1Н, Н-4`), 7.47 (t, 2H, H-3`, H-5`), 7.55-7.59 (d,
solutions of compounds 1 and 2 with a high pressure mercury lamp 1H, H-а, J=16.0), 7.78 (t, 1H, H-8), 7.78-7.80 (d, 2H, H-2`, H-6`,
(DRK-120, 120 W). Particular lines of the mercury lamp spectrum J=8.0), 7.84 (t, 1H, H-7), 8.03-8.05 (d, 1H, H-6, J=8.0), 8.04-8.08 (d,
with λ = 313, 365 and 405 nm were isolated by glass filters from the 1H, H-b, J=16.0), 8.05-8.07 (d, 1H, H-9, J=8.0), 9.19 (s, 1H, H-3); 13С
standard set of color optical glasses. The photoprocesses were NMR (acetone-d6, 400.13 MHz, 25 °C) δ: 125.4 (C-a), 127.4 (3C, C-
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 5
Please do not adjust margins