D. Crich et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 14 (2003) 2861–2864
2863
P.; Sibi, M., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001; Vol. 2,
pp. 188–206.
2. (a) Newcomb, M.; Horner, J. H.; Whitted, P. O.; Crich,
D.; Huang, X.; Yao, Q.; Zipse, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 10685–10694; (b) Crich, D.; Huang, X.; New-
comb, M. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 523–529; (c) New-
comb, M.; Miranda, N.; Huang, X.; Crich, D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6128–6129; (d) Bales, B. C.;
Horner, J. H.; Huang, X.; Newcomb, M.; Crich, D.;
Greenberg, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3623–
3629; (e) Crich, D.; Huang, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 9239–9245.
3. (a) Crich, D.; Ranganathan, K.; Huang, X. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 1917–1919; (b) Crich, D.; Neelamkavil, S. Org.
Lett. 2002, 4, 2573–2575.
Scheme 6. Retarded cyclization and decomposition in the
manno-series.
4. For reviews on the oxidative approach to alkene radical
cations, see: (a) Hintz, S.; Heidbreder, A.; Mattay, J. In
Topics in Current Chemistry; Mattay, J., Ed.; Springer:
Berlin, 1996; Vol. 177, pp. 77–124; (b) Bauld, N. L.;
Bellville, D. J.; Harirchian, B.; Lorenz, K. T.; Pabon, R.
A.; Reynolds, D. W.; Wirth, D. D.; Chiou, H.-S.; Marsh,
B. K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 371–378; (c) Schmittel,
M.; Burghart, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36,
2550–2589.
tion due to the failure of one or more of the propaga-
tion steps. A complex reaction mixture was obtained
from which only minor amounts (<10%) of 17 could be
isolated. Instead, a number of unidentified products
were formed, all in minor amounts strongly suggesting
that decomposition of one or more intermediates had
taken place.
5. (a) Crich, D.; Ranganathan, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 12422–12423; (b) Crich, D.; Gastaldi, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1998, 39, 9377–9380.
We suggest that the difference in reactivity between
precursors 4 and 5 is due to the different placement of
the phosphate counter ion in the respective contact ion
pairs 8 and 9. In effect, in 8 (Scheme 5) the phosphate
is located on the opposite face of the radical cation to
that from which the alkene must approach resulting in
a clean cyclization, smooth propagation and a high
yield of product. In the case of 9, on the other hand, if
the cyclization is to lead to a cis-fused product the
alkene of essence has to approach the same face of the
radical cation as is shielded by the counter ion. This
obvious steric impedance to such a trajectory retards
cyclization and permits competing decomposition of the
alkene radical cation, one possibility for which is shown
in Scheme 6.
6. Horner, J. H.; Taxil, E.; Newcomb, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 5402–5410.
7. In the particular example illustrated the slow step, with a
lower limit of >2×108 s−1, was the fragmentation.6
8. Yu, B.; Xie, J.; Deng, S.; Hui, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 12196–12197.
1
9. 4: mp=95–97°C; [h]D20=−26.7 (c, 3.0, CHCl3); H NMR
(CDCl3), l: 3.45–3.54 (m, 1H), 3.62 (t, J=9.8 Hz, 1H),
3.70–3.85 (m, 2H), 4.12–4.20 (m, 1H), 4.28–4.41 (m, 2H),
4.49–4.60 (m, 1H), 4.98 (d, J=9.8 Hz, 1H), 5.00–5.18 (m,
2H), 5.53 (s, 1H), 5.71–5.85 (m, 1H), 7.15–7.60 (m, 20 H);
13C NMR (CDCl3), l: 68.6, 71.7, 73.7, 78.8 (d), 80.0,
81.1, 81.9 (d), 101.1, 117.5, 120.1 120.2, 120.3, 120.4,
125.1, 125.8, 126.6, 128.2, 128.4, 128.9, 129.0, 129.0,
129.5, 129.6, 134.4, 135.5, 136.9, 150.7 (q); 31P NMR
(CDCl3), l: −12.8. Anal. calcd for C34H33O8PSe: C,
60.09; H, 4.89; Found: C, 60.56; H, 5.56.
These observations closely parallel the results of our
study on intramolecular nucleophilic attack by amines
on alkene radical cations derived by a related fragmen-
tation approach wherein attack on the opposite face of
the radical cation to the one shielded by the departing
phosphate is strongly favored.5a
10. Acetobromomannose was prepared according to the liter-
ature method: Talley, E. A.; Reynolds, D. D.; Evans, W.
L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1943, 65, 575–582.
11. 5: mp=154–155°C; [h]2D4=−29.6 (c, 1.0, CHCl3); 1H
NMR (CDCl3), l: 3.36–3.46 (m, 1H), 3.65–3.69 (m, 1H),
3.75–3.84 (m, 2H), 4.11–4.18 (m, 1H), 4.24–4.33 (m, 2H),
5.09 (d, J=3.9 Hz, 1H), 5.15 (d, J=10.8 Hz, 1H),
5.32–5.39 (m, 2H), 5.43 (s, 1H), 5.81–5.93 (m, 1H),
7.16–7.59 (m, 20H); 13C NMR (CDCl3), l: 68.8, 71.9,
73.3, 77.0, 77.7, 80.3 (d), 83.4 (d), 102.0, 118.0, 120.5,
120.98, 121.02, 121.11, 121.14, 125.5, 125.7, 126.4, 128.6,
129.4, 129.6, 129.7, 129.9, 130.1, 134.3, 134.8, 137.7,
151.3 (q); 31P NMR (CDCl3), l: −11.6. Anal. calcd for
C34H33O8PSe: C, 60.09; H, 4.89; Found: C, 60.28; H,
5.01.
Acknowledgements
We thank the NSF (CHE 9986200) for support of this
work and our colleagues Bhushan Surve and Professor
D. A. Wink for the X-ray structure determination.
References
1
12. 17: mp=73–75°C; [h]2D0=+0.6 (c, 1.1, CHCl3); H NMR
1. For reviews, see: (a) Beckwith, A. L. J.; Crich, D.;
Duggan, P. J.; Yao, Q. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 3273–3312;
(b) Crich, D. In Radicals in Organic Synthesis; Renaud,
(CDCl3), l: 1.10 (d, J=6.5 Hz, 3H), 2.81–2.95 (m, 1H),
3.37 (t, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.74–3.91 (m, 3H), 4.12 (t, J=8.0
Hz, 1H), 4.40–4.46 (m, 1H), 4.51–4.56 (m, 1H), 5.61 (s,