protecting group occludes reduction of the re face of the
olefin that would produce the required trans-azepanone;
accordingly, deprotection of the 2,4-dimethoxybenzyl group
with trifluoroacetic acid afforded the alternative hydrogena-
tion substrate 9. Screening of a range of metal catalysts and
solvents revealed that hydrogenation using Pd/C in toluene,
with in situ Boc reprotection, afforded the desired product
10 in a 2: 1 trans/cis ratio (51% isolated trans). Treatment
of the lactam 10 with 1 equivalent of sodium hydride
followed by addition of 2,2,2-trifluoroethyltrichloromethane
sulfonate at low temperature (-30 °C) afforded 11. Depro-
tection to the targeted primary amine 2 followed by urea
formation with piperidine 126 gave telcagepant (1) in high
yield.
The preceding route could be implemented to deliver
limited quantities of 1 for preliminary characterization,
but it suffered from several drawbacks. The key metathesis
reaction was inefficient, requiring large amounts of the
Ru catalyst (30 mol %) which would render scale-up
prohibitive; additionally, the hydrogenation proceeded
with only modest levels of diastereoselectivity to produce
a cis/trans mixture. As a consequence, we sought to
develop a more efficient, scaleable, and diastereoselective
route.
Figure 1. Telcagepant.
(Figure 2), of telcagepant is the remote C6 stereocenter.
To address this problem, a route was envisioned in which
olefin 3 would serve as a substrate to investigate diaste-
reoselective reductions; implicit in this strategy is the
potential utilization of the C3 amino group to establish
the remote C6 stereocenter. A ring-closing metathesis
carbon-carbon bond forming reaction of the R-styrene 4
would assemble the 7-member lactam ring, with a D-
amino acid starting material serving to establish the
required 3R-amino stereochemistry.
A second-generation route was proposed which would
employ an unprecedented diastereoselective Hayashi-Miyaura
Rh-catalyzed arylboronic acid addition7 to nitroalkene 5 to
install the key C6 stereocenter (Figure 2, 5 to 2). The
efficiency of this transformation was difficult to predict due
to the conspicuous lack of examples employing R-unsubsti-
tuted nitroalkenes; additionally, as the use of these Rh-
catalyzed additions has been limited to achiral substrates, it
was uncertain if the stereochemical outcome would be under
catalyst control or be subject to substrate control due to the
preexisting C3 stereocenter residing in 5.
The commercially available D-glutamic acid derivative
13 was elaborated, using a modification of the literature
conditions,8 to the orthogonally protected diester 14 in
81% yield over two steps (Scheme 2). DIBAL-H effected
a selective half-reduction of the γ-ester to afford aldehyde
15, which was used without purification in a Henry
reaction with nitromethane (toluene, catalytic tetrameth-
ylguanidine). Subsequent addition of methanesulfonyl
chloride and triethylamine to the intermediate nitro alcohol
effected elimination to give the nitro olefin 16 in good
overall yield.
Figure 2. Two routes to azepanone 2.
A Suzuki cross-coupling reaction of vinyl bromide 6
(Scheme 1), prepared in two steps from L-allylglycine,2 with
2,3-difluorophenylboronic acid proceeded in good yield to
afford the metathesis reaction precursor 7. Cyclization of this
challenging substrate was accomplished using 30 mol % of
the Grubbs second-generation ruthenium catalyst4 under
moderately dilute conditions to deliver the azepenone 8 in
58% yield.5 The metathesis product 8 served as the substrate
to study diastereoselective olefin reduction conditions. Reac-
tion of olefins such as 8 with an array of hydrogenation
catalysts and solvents afforded the saturated caprolactams
with trans/cis ratios ranging from 1:5 to 1:10. Molecular
modeling studies indicated that the methylene of the DMB
With an established synthesis of the alkene 16 in place,
experimentstowardtheexecutionofthekeyHayashi-Miyaura
Rh-catalyzed arylboronic acid addition could be under-
(6) Burgey, C. S.; Stump, C. A.; Nguyen, D. N.; Deng, Z. J.; Quigley,
A. G.; Norton, B. R.; Bell, I. M.; Mosser, S. D.; Salvatore, C. A.; Rutledge,
R. Z.; Kane, S. A.; Koblan, K; Vacca, J. P.; Graham, S. L.; Williams, T. M.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 5052–5056.
(7) (a) Hayashi, T.; Yamasaki, K. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2829–2844.
Hayashi, T.; Senda, T.; Ogasawara, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 10716–
10717.
(4) Trnka, T. M.; Grubbs, R. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 18–29.
(5) Both the Grubbs first-generation and the Grubbs-Hoveyda catalysts
were ineffective for this transformation. The major byproducts detected in
this reaction were dimerization of the substrate and an adduct incorporating
the styrene from the Grubbs precatalyst.
(8) Padron, J. M.; Kokotos, G.; Martin, T.; Markidis, T.; Gibbons, W. A.;
Martin, V. S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 3381–3394.
(9) Senda, T.; Ogasawara, M.; Hayashi, T. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
6852–6856.
3236
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 15, 2008