11800 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 122, No. 48, 2000
Fu¨rstner et al.
readily convert them into the parent prostaglandins (e.g. 1 f
4) which are then used to control smooth muscle contractions
of the cerata extruding the defense secretion. Finally, fatty acid
esters of 3 likely serve as chemical release factors for ovulation
and therefore exert important functions in the reproduction of
these animals.2
Scheme 1
PG-1,15-lactones have also caught the attention of medicinal
chemists.4 The widespread use of prostaglandin esters as
prodrugs suggests that these intramolecular versions may serve
similar purposes. Since their polarities and shapes are consider-
ably different from those of the uncyclized hydroxy acids, they
may go unrecognized by normal PG processing enzymes;
depending on the different esterase activity in various tissues,
however, one may envisage a localized release of the parent
prostaglandin and thereby trigger a sustained onset of its specific
biological function.5
Intrigued by these diverse and promising physiological and
pharmacological properties, we have engaged in a program
aimed at the total synthesis of this class of natural products.6
Described below is a comprehensive summary of our results in
this field which led to the total synthesis of prostaglandin
E2-1,15-lactone (1), 15-epi-prostaglandin E2-1,15-lactone (22),
and the parent prostaglandin E2 (4) itself, as well as to a formal
total synthesis of prostaglandin A2-1,15-lactone (2). Although
1 can also be prepared from PGE2 4 by macrolactonization
reactions,7 we believe that the use of alkyne metathesis as a
fundamentally different and novel concept for the construction
of such target molecules offers significant advantages, including
a high overall efficiency, an excellent “economy of steps”,8 and
an inherent flexibility in structural terms. The latter aspect is
illustrated by the synthesis of several previously unknown PG
analogues differing from the natural product in the R side chain
which is particularly difficult to alter and manipulate by more
conventional approaches.
(E)- and (Z)-isomers, with the former dominating in most of
the recorded cases.9,10 This tendency to form product mixtures
constitutes an obvious drawback in target-oriented synthesis.
To circumwent this inherent problem, we have proposed an
indirect but stereoselectiVe approach to macrocyclic (Z)-alkenes
which consists of a ring-closing metathesis of diyne substrates
followed by Lindlar reduction of the resulting cycloalkyne
products (Scheme 1).11-14 Three different catalyst systems have
been used so far for this purpose, including (1) the tungsten
alkylidyne complex (t-BuO)3WtCCMe3 developed by Schrock,15
(2) a structurally unknown catalyst formed in situ from
Mo(CO)6 and p-chlorophenol (or related phenol additives),16
and (3) Mo[N(t-Bu)(Ar)]3 5 or 6 activated in situ by means of
CH2Cl2.13,17
Results and Discussion
Although all previous applications of these tools are very
promising,11-14,18 alkyne metathesis in general is still in its
infancy as compared with alkene metathesis and the envisaged
extension of this methodology to a total synthesis of 1 and
related targets therefore raises several new questions: Thus, it
Strategy. Ring closing metathesis of dienes (RCM) has
recently gained considerable importance as a tool for organic
synthesis.9,10 Among the few shortcomings that infringe upon
the superb overall application profile of RCM, the lack of control
over the configuration of the newly formed double bond is most
noteworthy if the reaction is applied to the macrocyclic series.
The products formed are usually obtained as mixtures of the
(11) Fu¨rstner, A.; Seidel, G. Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 1758; Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1998, 37, 1734.
(12) Fu¨rstner, A.; Guth, O.; Rumbo, A.; Seidel, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 11108.
(13) Fu¨rstner, A.; Mathes, C.; Lehmann, C. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 9453.
(14) (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Rumbo, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 2608. (b)
Fu¨rstner, A.; Seidel, G. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 606, 75. (c) Fu¨rstner,
A.; Dierkes, T. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2463.
(15) (a) Schrock, R. R.; Clark, D. N.; Sancho, J.; Wengrovius, J. H.;
Rocklage, S. M.; Pedersen, S. F. Organometallics 1982, 1, 1645. (b)
Freudenberger, J. H.; Schrock, R. R.; Churchill, M. R.; Rheingold, A. L.;
Ziller, J. W. Organometallics 1984, 3, 1563. (c) Listemann, M. L.; Schrock,
R. R. Organometallics 1985, 4, 74. (d) Schrock, R. R. Polyhedron 1995,
14, 3177.
(4) (a) Bundy, G. L.; Peterson, D. C.; Cornette, J. C.; Miller, W. L.;
Spilman, C. H.; Wilks, J. W. J. Med. Chem. 1983, 26, 1089. (b) Bundy, G.
L.; Morton, D. R.; Peterson, D. C.; Nishizawa, E. E.; Miller, W. L. J. Med.
Chem. 1983, 26, 790. (c) Spilman, C. H.; Beuving, D. C.; Forbes, A. D.;
Kimball, F. A. Prostaglandins 1977, 14, 477. (d) For related 1,20-lactones
see: Andersen, N. H.; Imamoto, S.; Subramanian, N. Prostaglandins 1981,
22, 831.
(5) 1 decreases gastric secretion in dogs by 90% when administered
intravenously at a dose of 100 µg/kg. Its antifertility activity is essentially
equal to that of parent PGE2 4 released by rapid enzyme catalyzed
hydrolysis. Therefore it has been concluded (ref 4) that PGE-lactones
themselves essentially lack intrinsic activity.
(6) For a preliminary communication see: Fu¨rstner, A.; Grela, K. Angew.
Chem. 2000, 112, 1292; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 1234.
(7) (a) Corey, E. J.; Nicolaou, K. C.; Melvin, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1975, 97, 653. (b) Narasaka, K.; Maruyama, K.; Mukaiyama, T. Chem.
Lett. 1978, 885. (c) See also ref 4.
(8) For a discussion of these and related strategic goals see: Fu¨rstner,
A. Synlett 1999, 1523.
(16) For early examples of scrambling or dimerization of simple alkynes
by structurally undefined catalyst systems see: (a) Mortreux, A.; Blanchard,
M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1974, 786. (b) Villemin, D.; Cadiot, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 5139. (c) Kaneta, N.; Hirai, T.; Mori, M. Chem.
Lett. 1995, 627. (d) Kaneta, N.; Hikichi, K.; Asaka, S.-I.; Uemura, M.;
Mori, M. Chem. Lett. 1995, 1055. (e) Pschirer, N. G.; Bunz, U. H. F.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2481.
(9) For the most recent review see: Fu¨rstner, A. Angew. Chem. 2000,
112, 3140; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 3012.
(10) (a) Grubbs, R. H.; Chang, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4413. (b)
Fu¨rstner, A. Top. Catal. 1997, 4, 285. (c) Schuster, M.; Blechert, S. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2036. (d) Fu¨rstner, A. Top. Organomet.
Chem. 1998, 1, 37. (e) Ivin, K. J.; Mol, J. C. Olefin Metathesis and
Methathesis Polymerization, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1997.
(17) (a) See the following for an excellent review on the preparation of
5 and its reactions with small inorganic molecules: Cummins, C. C. Chem.
Commun. 1998, 1777. (b) Laplaza, C. E.; Odom, A. L.; Davis, W. M.;
Cummins, C. C.; Protasiewicz, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 4999
and literature cited therein.
(18) For a short review on alkyne metathesis see: Bunz, U. H. F.;
Kloppenburg, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999, 38, 478.