C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
and the scaling reduced mass µ (eq 4, µ ) 1 amu). Imaginary
frequency values of -1086 and -1077 cm-1 in 1cq and 1dq result
in barrier widths of 0.968 and 0.983 Å, respectively.
2Vo
µ(2πc|νq|)2
s )
(4)
x
Finally, the calculated kZPE values obtained with eq 2 taking a
frequency factor, cνC-D ≈ 6.5 × 1013 s-1 [kZPE(D2H)calcd ) 1.8 ×
106 s-1 and kZPE(D3)calcd ) 1.2 × 106 s-1] are 2 orders of magnitude
larger than those determined experimentally (kZPE(D2H)exp ) 2.2
× 104 s-1 and kZPE (D3)exp ) 9.3 × 103 s-1). While a calculation
error of ca. 2.3 kcal/mol in the height of the barrier could explain
this discrepancy, an excellent agreement is obtained with known
pre-exponential factors9 of ∼5 × 1011 s-1 for the H-transfer reaction.
A small disagreement between experimental (2.4) and calculated
(1.5) tunneling isotope effects suggests that the one-dimensional
treatment of tunneling accounts only partially for the experimental
observations. However, a simple model based on the effect of
isotopes on ZPE and the shape of the barrier accounts for the
measured results and suggests that a difference of only 0.015 Å in
barrier width leads to 2-fold differences in tunneling rates at very
low temperatures. Studies with higher level calculations and direct
dynamics methods will be reported in due course.
Figure 2. Optimized reactant 31, transition structure TS, and enol 32
(parameters listed, d ) distance, D ) dihedral angle).
Table 1. Energetics for D-Abstraction in the Triplet State: ∆Eq is
the ZPE-Inclusive Barrier Height, ∆Eo is the Zero-Point Inclusive
Energy of Reaction, νq is the Imaginary Frequency of the
Transition State, and ZPE is the Scaled ZPE of the Reactant18
triplet
∆
Eq
∆
Eo
νq
(cm-
ZPE
1
ketone
(kcal/mol)
(kcal/mol)
)
(kcal/mol)
31a
31b
31c
31d
4.5
5.4
5.5
5.6
-4.0
-4.2
-4.1
-4.0
1477i
1088i
1086i
1077i
154.3
150.3
146.4
142.4
characteristic of reactions that occur from ZPE levels.1,15 Tunneling
rates of kZPE(D2H) ) 2.2 × 104 s-1 and kZPE(D3) ) 9.3 × 103 s-1
reveal a positive and relatively large secondary R-TIE of 2.4.
Density functional theory (DFT, B3LYP/6-31G*)16,17 was used
to obtain structure and energetic information along the triplet state
reaction coordinate. The optimized structures for the triplet state
H-transfer reaction are shown in Figure 2 and the ZPE-inclusive18
energetics in Table 1.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by NSF Grant
CHE0242270. L.M.C. thanks the NSF, Paul & Daisy Soros
Fellowship, and NSF IGERT: MCTP, Grant: DGE-0114443). We
thank Prof. D. Truhlar for valuable comments and advice.
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis of isotopically
labeled anthrones 1b-1d and Cartesian coordinates of the stationary
points. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
Calculations show that the reaction proceeds with minimal heavy
atom motion. The dihedral angle between the aromatic and CdO
groups (D[Ar-C-O]) change from 178.2 in 31 to 175.3 in the TS
and acquire a slight twist in 32 (D[Ar-C-O] ) 162.7). The
transferring H(D) atom is only 2.38 Å from the carbonyl oxygen
in 31, which is less than the sum of their van der Waals radii (2.72
Å).19 An O-H distance of 1.24 Å in the TS structure is close to
that in the triplet enol 32 (d[O-H] ) 0.97 Å). These results are in
good agreement with a recent literature report.20
References
(1) Zuev, P. S.; Sheridan, R. S.; Albu, T. V.; Truhlar, D. G.; Hrovat, D. A.;
Borden, W. T. Science 2003, 299, 867.
(2) Bell, R. P. The Tunnel Effect in Chemistry; Chapman & Hall: London,
1980.
(3) (a) Kohen, A.; Klinman, J. P. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 397. (b) Doll,
K. M.; Bender, B. R.; Finke, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10877.
(c) Alhambra, C.; Sanchez, M. L.; Corchado, J. C.; Gao, Y.; Truhlar, D.
G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 347, 512.
(4) Horsewill, A. J.; Jones, N. H.; Caciuffo, R. Science 2001, 291, 100.
(5) Garrett, B. C.; Truhlar, D. G.; Bowman, J. M.; Wagner, A. F.; Robie, D.;
Arepalli, S.; Presser, N.; Gordon, R. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
3515.
(6) Hiraoka, K.; Sato, T.; Takayama, T. Science 2001, 292, 869.
(7) Garcia-Garibay, M. A.; Gamarnik, A.; Bise, R.; Jenks, W. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 10264.
(8) (a) Al-Soufi, W.; Eychmuller, A.; Grellmann, K. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1991,
95, 2022-2026. (b) Smedarchina, Z.; Enchev, V.; Lavtchieva, L. J. Phys.
Chem. 1994, 98, 4218.
The ZPE-inclusive barrier height, ∆Eq, increases with deuterium
3
substitution due to differences in ZPE values in 1 and TS. The
results in Table 1 indicate that H/D abstraction is exothermic by
∼4 kcal/mol (∆Eo) and that barrier height differences for a primary
isotope effect (1a vs 1b) and a secondary R-isotope effect (e.g., 1c
vs 1d) are about an order of magnitude different (0.9 and 0.1 kcal/
mol, respectively). In search of qualitative insight into the temper-
ature-independent tunneling reaction, we calculated the rate of
tunneling from zero-point energy levels (kZPE) using the approach
described by Truhlar et al.15 Their model considers a parabolic
barrier with an imaginary frequency νq, and an adiabatic barrier
height, Vo, without the ZPE contribution of the C-D stretching
mode involved along the reaction coordinate. The tunneling rate is
given by eq 2, where PG(EZPE) is the quantum mechanical
permeability defined in eq 3.
(9) Wagner, P. J.; Park, B.-S. Org. Photochem. 1991, 11, 227-366.
(10) (a) Wagner, P. J.; Chen, C.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 239. (b)
Scaiano, J. C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1980, 73, 319.
(11) Grellmann, K.-H.; Weller, H.; Tauer, E. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1983, 95, 195-
199.
(12) (a) Johnson, B. A.; Kleinman, M. H.; Turro, N. J.; Garcia-Garibay, M.
A. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6944. (b) Johnson, B. A.; Hu, Y.; Houk, K.
N.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6941.
(13) Streitwieser, A., Jr.; Jagow, R. H.; Fahey, R. C.; Suzuki, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1958, 80, 2326.
(14) Cizmeciyan, D.; Yonutas, H.; Karlen, S. D.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Solid
State Nucl. Magn. Res. 2005, 28, 1-8. The UB3LYP/6-31G* ZPE-
inclusive barrier for the methyl rotation in 31 is 1.0 kcal/mol.
(15) Wanchoba, S. E.; Hu, W.-P.; Truhlar, D. G. Phys. ReV. B 1995, 51, 9985.
(16) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-5652. (b) Head-Gordon,
M.; Pople, J. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1988, 153, 503.
(17) Calculations were performed using the Gaussian 98 suite of programs.
(18) Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502.
(19) Ihmels, H.; Scheffer, J. R. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 885.
(20) Casadesus, R.; Moreno, M.; Lluch, J. M. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108,
4536.
kZPE ) cνC-DPG(EZPE
)
(2)
(3)
PG(EZPE) ) 1/(1 + exp {[2π/(hc |νq|)] (∆Eq)})
Secondary alpha isotopes cause variations in the height of the
barrier (∆Eq) from 5.5 kcal/mol for 1c to 5.6 kcal/mol in 1d.
Changes in the width of the barrier (2s) are estimated from the
assumed parabola, which can be described by the values of νq, Vo,
JA052487N
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 127, NO. 29, 2005 10179